Choo Ian Ming

Choo Ian Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in receivership and insurance. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in winding up and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Winding Up	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Receivership	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Drag-along Rights	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choo Ian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Choo Ian Ming has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cavenagh Law LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Victory International v Borrelli: Receiver's Duties & Legal Profession Act Assessment(Jan 2025) Marketlend v QBE Insurance: Trade Credit Insurance, Assignment, Consent, Estoppel, Admissibility of Evidence, Non-Disclosure, Risk(Jan 2025) Victory International Holdings v Borrelli: Receiver's Duty to Account & Legal Fees(Mar 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Choo Ian Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.3 parties avg	3.3	67%
Partial	23.3 parties avg	3.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2025	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Choo Ian Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2025	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Victory International v Borrelli: Receiver's Duties & Legal Profession Act Assessment 15 Jan 2025 Clifford Chance Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	15 Jan 2025	Clifford Chance Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal Partially LostAppeal partially lost to the extent that CCPL is ordered to deliver its bill for assessment by the court.
2	Marketlend v QBE Insurance: Trade Credit Insurance, Assignment, Consent, Estoppel, Admissibility of Evidence, Non-Disclosure, Risk 07 Jan 2025 Australian Executor Trustees Limited (Claimant)Lost	07 Jan 2025	Australian Executor Trustees Limited (Claimant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed due to unauthorized assignment of policy and failure to prove insured debt. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Victory International Holdings v Borrelli: Receiver's Duty to Account & Legal Fees 18 Mar 2024 Clifford Chance Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	18 Mar 2024	Clifford Chance Pte Ltd (Defendant): Originating Application unsuccessful against defendantThe court did not order Clifford Chance Pte Ltd to take any action.