Chooi Jing Yen

Chooi Jing Yen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 39 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder. Their track record shows a 8.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated expertise across 116 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	22 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	14 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	14 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	12 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	9 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provocation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Complicity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reckless Driving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cumulative Scald Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Case Management Stay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal motions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reverse Takeover	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Client confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remittance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fetishistic Disorder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remittance Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed Money Changer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Consent Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Non-Disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Similar fact evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chooi Jing Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chooi Jing Yen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 37 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	37 cases	95% of cases	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Guarantee, Performance Bond & Striking Out Defences(Jan 2024) PP v Soo Cheow Wee: Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders for Voluntarily Causing Hurt and Criminal Intimidation(Jul 2023) Singapore Medical Council v Wee Teong Boo: Disciplinary Tribunal Appeal for Inappropriate Prescription of Medication(Jul 2023)
Chooi Jing Yen LLC	2 cases	5% of cases	PP v Muhammed Izwan & Ahmad Suhaimi: Drug Trafficking Conviction Affirmed After Remittal(Jan 2025) PP v Soh Jing Zhe: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Similar Fact Evidence(Dec 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chooi Jing Yen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 5 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	322.8 parties avg	2.8	82%
Partial	42.3 parties avg	2.3	10%
Won	32.5 parties avg	2.5	8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	62.9 parties avg	2.9
2020	82.8 parties avg	2.8
2021	92.6 parties avg	2.6
2022	52.8 parties avg	2.8
2023	52.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chooi Jing Yen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	32(82%)	82%
Partial	4(10%)	10%
Won	3(8%)	8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	55,720,127.00	5,065,466.0911 cases	11
USD	126,603,806.66	63,301,903.332 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	6 411	Lost: 4 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2020	8 611	Lost: 6 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (12.5%) Won: 1 cases (12.5%)
2021	9 81	Lost: 8 cases (88.9%) Partial: 1 cases (11.1%)
2022	5 5	Lost: 5 cases (100.0%)
2023	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 39 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Muhammed Izwan & Ahmad Suhaimi: Drug Trafficking Conviction Affirmed After Remittal 22 Jan 2025 Muhammed Izwan bin Borhan (Defendant)Lost	22 Jan 2025	Muhammed Izwan bin Borhan (Defendant): Conviction Re-affirmedThe court found that the additional evidence did not raise a reasonable doubt and re-affirmed the original conviction.
2	PP v Soh Jing Zhe: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Similar Fact Evidence 30 Dec 2024 Pong Jia Rong Kenji (Defendant)Lost	30 Dec 2024	Pong Jia Rong Kenji (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of trafficking in a Class A controlled drug.
3	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Guarantee, Performance Bond & Striking Out Defences 30 Jan 2024 UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	30 Jan 2024	UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of AR Chong dismissed; judgment entered against the first defendant for US$63.3m with interest and costs.
4	PP v Soo Cheow Wee: Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders for Voluntarily Causing Hurt and Criminal Intimidation 30 Jul 2023 Soo Cheow Wee (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	30 Jul 2023	Soo Cheow Wee (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe accused person's appeal was allowed in part, and the aggregate sentence was reduced.
5	Singapore Medical Council v Wee Teong Boo: Disciplinary Tribunal Appeal for Inappropriate Prescription of Medication 02 Jul 2023 Wee Teong Boo (Respondent)Lost	02 Jul 2023	Wee Teong Boo (Respondent): Struck off the Register of Medical PractitionersDr. Wee was ordered to be struck off the Register of Medical Practitioners with immediate effect. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Public Prosecutor v Tan Chee Beng: Outrage of Modesty & Sexual Offences 12 Apr 2023 Tan Chee Beng (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	12 Apr 2023	Tan Chee Beng (Respondent, Appellant): Conviction upheld; Appeal dismissedTan Chee Beng's appeal against his conviction on the Third Charge and his sentence of five months’ imprisonment was dismissed. He was convicted on all four charges.
7	Amberwork Source v QA Systems: Breach of Contract & Illegality in Telecom Cable Sale 10 Apr 2023 Yeo Chow Wah (Defendant)Won	10 Apr 2023	Yeo Chow Wah (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant as the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Striking Out Defenses in Guarantee Claim 29 Jan 2023 UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Jan 2023	UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant): Defenses Struck OutDefendant's defenses were struck out, and judgment was entered against them for USD 63,303,806.66 (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies the amount in USD).
9	Public Prosecutor v Miya Manik: Complicity, Common Intention, and Murder Sentencing 10 Nov 2022 Miya Manik (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	10 Nov 2022	Miya Manik (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedManik's appeal against the sentence on the Substituted s 326 Charge was dismissed.
10	PP v Azlin & Ridzuan: Murder Sentencing Appeal for Child Scalding Case 17 Oct 2022 Ridzuan Bin Mega Abdul Rahman (Respondent)Lost	17 Oct 2022	Ridzuan Bin Mega Abdul Rahman (Respondent): Life ImprisonmentRidzuan's sentence was adjusted to life imprisonment. The sentence of caning was removed.
11	Wee Teong Boo v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Evidentiary Decision 18 Jul 2022 Wee Teong Boo (Applicant)Lost	18 Jul 2022	Wee Teong Boo (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to seek a quashing order against the Admissibility Decision was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	UD Trading Group v TA Private Capital: Leave to Appeal Stay of Proceedings 02 Feb 2022 UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	02 Feb 2022	UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to appeal dismissed; UDTG to pay costs of SGD 8,000 to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Ahmed Salim v Public Prosecutor: Diminished Responsibility & Premeditated Murder 18 Jan 2022 Ahmed Salim (Appellant)Lost	18 Jan 2022	Ahmed Salim (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
14	Wu Zhi Yong v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving & Reckless Driving Sentencing 18 Nov 2021 Wu Zhi Yong (Appellant)Lost	18 Nov 2021	Wu Zhi Yong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
15	Miya Manik v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motions, Adducing Fresh Evidence, Abuse of Process 21 Sep 2021 Miya Manik (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	21 Sep 2021	Miya Manik (Appellant, Respondent): Criminal Motion DismissedCriminal Motion No 6 of 2021 seeking to adduce fresh evidence was dismissed.
16	Tan Hon Leong Eddie v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of CNB & AG Decisions on Drug Offenses 22 Aug 2021 Tan Hon Leong Eddie (Applicant)Lost	22 Aug 2021	Tan Hon Leong Eddie (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to commence judicial review proceedings dismissed.
17	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Raffles Town Club Dispute over Company Act s216A and Appeal Leave 01 Jul 2021 Lin Jianwei (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Lin Jianwei (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedLin's appeals were dismissed, and he was ordered to pay Tung $40,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Fu Hao v Evancarl Ltd: Breach of Contract, Formation, Illegality & Public Policy 06 Jun 2021 Zheng Jiabin (Defendant)Lost	06 Jun 2021	Zheng Jiabin (Defendant): Claim AllowedZheng is jointly and severally liable for damages in the amount of $6,416,589 for Evancarl's breach of the 1st Procurement Agreement under the Deed, and $806,949 in damages for his breach of the 2nd Procurement Agreement, plus interest at 5.33% per annum from 19 March 2019 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Yap Lee Kok v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Sexual Penetration of Minor 06 Apr 2021 Yap Lee Kok (Appellant)Lost	06 Apr 2021	Yap Lee Kok (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppellant's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
20	Public Prosecutor v. Ahmed Salim: Murder, Provocation, and Diminished Responsibility in Golden Dragon Hotel Killing 21 Mar 2021 Ahmed Salim (Defense)Lost	21 Mar 2021	Ahmed Salim (Defense): Convicted of MurderAccused was found guilty of murder and sentenced to death.
21	Ang Jian Sheng Jonathan v Lyu Yan: Illegality and Public Policy in Cross-Border Remittance 22 Feb 2021 Ang Jian Sheng Jonathan (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	22 Feb 2021	Ang Jian Sheng Jonathan (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $38,500 to the respondent.
22	Sameer Rahman v Nomura Singapore Limited: Striking Out Pleadings in Wrongful Dismissal & Negligent Misinformation Claim 21 Feb 2021 Sameer Rahman (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	21 Feb 2021	Sameer Rahman (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the wrongful dismissal claim.
23	Sameer Rahman v. Nomura Singapore Ltd: Striking Out Pleadings in Wrongful Dismissal & Employment Law 23 Aug 2020 Sameer Rahman (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	23 Aug 2020	Sameer Rahman (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe plaintiff can continue with his claim for wrongful dismissal. The court struck out claims for loss of job opportunities, breach of trust, duty of care, and libel.
24	Public Prosecutor v Miya Manik: Murder Charge Reduced to Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapon 10 Aug 2020 Miya Manik (Defendant)Lost	10 Aug 2020	Miya Manik (Defendant): LostConvicted under section 326 read with section 34 of the Penal Code and sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
25	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Minority Shareholder Oppression and Taxation of Legal Fees 26 Jul 2020 Lin Jianwei (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Jul 2020	Lin Jianwei (Plaintiff): Application for taxation of fees dismissedOriginating Summons No 320 of 2020 dismissed; the court found that the plaintiff did not act in good faith and that no special circumstances warranted taxation.
26	Lyu Yan v Lim Tien Chiang: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, and Conspiracy in Cross-Border Remittance 19 Jul 2020 Ang Jian Sheng Jonathan (Defendant)Lost	19 Jul 2020	Ang Jian Sheng Jonathan (Defendant): Liable for Conspiracy, Negligence, and Unjust EnrichmentJointly and severally liable with Derek and Joseph for RMB20,970,000 for conspiracy, negligence, and unjust enrichment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	PP v Wong Chee Meng: Corruption, PCA, Public Servant, Town Council Contracts 15 Jul 2020 Chia Sin Lan (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	15 Jul 2020	Chia Sin Lan (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Dismissed, Sentence EnhancedChia's appeal was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced.
28	Public Prosecutor v Wee Teong Boo: Rape, Outrage of Modesty, Digital Penetration, Prosecution's Duty of Disclosure 09 Jun 2020 Wee Teong Boo (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant)Won	09 Jun 2020	Wee Teong Boo (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant): Convictions overturnedDr. Wee's convictions on the OM Charge and the Digital Penetration Offence were overturned.
29	Public Prosecutor v Boh Soon Ho: Murder, Provocation, and Diminished Responsibility 18 Mar 2020 Boh Soon Ho (Defendant)Lost	18 Mar 2020	Boh Soon Ho (Defendant): Imprisonment for LifeAccused was sentenced to imprisonment for life after being convicted of murder.
30	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court & Freedom of Expression 15 Mar 2020 Tan Liang Joo John (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	15 Mar 2020	Tan Liang Joo John (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Nov 2019 Zuraimy bin Musa (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	24 Nov 2019	Zuraimy bin Musa (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedZuraimy's appeal against his sentence on the amended charge was dismissed.
32	Public Prosecutor v Khoo Kwee Hock Leslie: Murder, Diminished Responsibility, Provocation, and Sudden Fight 16 Sep 2019 Khoo Kwee Hock Leslie (Defendant)Lost	16 Sep 2019	Khoo Kwee Hock Leslie (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.
33	Public Prosecutor v. Low Ji Qing: Sentencing Principles, Proportionality, and Mentally Disordered Offenders 25 Jul 2019 Low Ji Qing (Respondent)Won	25 Jul 2019	Low Ji Qing (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Respondent successfully defended the sentence imposed by the District Judge.
34	Public Prosecutor v Moad Fadzir: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Common Intention 14 Feb 2019 Zuraimy bin Musa (Defendant)Partial	14 Feb 2019	Zuraimy bin Musa (Defendant): Guilty on amended chargeZuraimy's charge was amended to abetment, and he was found guilty on the amended charge. Sentencing was adjourned.
35	PP v Muhammad Faizal: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Jan 2019 Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2019	Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff (Defendant): ConvictionThe Defendant was convicted of the charge.
36	Lyu Yan v Lim Tien Chiang: Injunction for Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Unjust Enrichment 21 Jan 2019 Lim Zhengde (Defendant)Lost	21 Jan 2019	Lim Zhengde (Defendant): Injunction grantedAn injunction was granted against the defendant.
37	AG v Wham Kwok Han Jolovan: Freedom of Speech & Contempt of Court 08 Oct 2018 Tan Liang Joo John (Respondent)Lost	08 Oct 2018	Tan Liang Joo John (Respondent): ConvictedConvicted for scandalising contempt under s 3(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016.
38	BMI v BMJ: Appeal Against Matrimonial Consent Order Dismissed Due to Lack of Fraudulent Non-Disclosure 08 Nov 2017 BMI (Applicant, Appellant, Petitioner)Lost	08 Nov 2017	BMI (Applicant, Appellant, Petitioner): Appeal dismissedThe wife's appeal to set aside the matrimonial consent order was dismissed.
39	BMI v BMJ: Setting Aside Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets Due to Alleged Fraudulent Non-Disclosure 21 May 2017 BMI (Petitioner)Lost	21 May 2017	BMI (Petitioner): Application DismissedWife's application to set aside the Consent Order was dismissed with costs of $15,000 awarded to the Husband (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).