Christopher Woo

Christopher Woo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in enforcement of foreign judgments and security for costs. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Christopher Woo has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
No Oral Modification Clause	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
State Immunity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Party Autonomy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Woo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Christopher Woo has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Lim Teng Siang v Hong Choon Hau: Oral Rescission & No Oral Modification Clause in Share Purchase Agreement(Apr 2021)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	33% of cases	Nike v Campomar: Res Judicata & Trade Mark Revocation for Non-Use of NIKE in Perfumery(Aug 2005)
Lawrence Quahe & Woo	1 cases	33% of cases	Ministry of Rural Development v Chan Leng Leng: Security for Costs & State Immunity(Apr 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Christopher Woo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Christopher Woo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Teng Siang v Hong Choon Hau: Oral Rescission & No Oral Modification Clause in Share Purchase Agreement 21 Apr 2021 Tan Kim Hee (Respondent, Defendant)Won	21 Apr 2021	Tan Kim Hee (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ministry of Rural Development v Chan Leng Leng: Security for Costs & State Immunity 18 Apr 2013 Interocean TSM Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	18 Apr 2013	Interocean TSM Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): WonThe defendant successfully defended against the appeal. No monetary amount was specified in the outcome. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Nike v Campomar: Res Judicata & Trade Mark Revocation for Non-Use of NIKE in Perfumery 04 Aug 2005 Nike Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Aug 2005	Nike Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the dismissal of its opposition based on res judicata was dismissed.