Chua Sui Tiong

Chua Sui Tiong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and trust law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chua Sui Tiong has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fiduciary duties and fraud and deceit.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chua Sui Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chua Sui Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chua Sui Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chua Sui Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chua Sui Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chua Sui Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance of breach of trust	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chua Sui Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Traceable proceeds	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chua Sui Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chua Sui Tiong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	1 cases	100% of cases	Malaysian International Trading Corp v Interamerica Asia: Breach of Trust, Conspiracy to Defraud, Dishonest Assistance(Aug 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chua Sui Tiong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 25.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	125.0 parties avg	25.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	125.0 parties avg	25.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chua Sui Tiong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Malaysian International Trading Corp v Interamerica Asia: Breach of Trust, Conspiracy to Defraud, Dishonest Assistance 29 Aug 2002 Malaysian International Trading Corp Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Aug 2002	Malaysian International Trading Corp Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff except in relation to the fourth, ninth, tenth, thirteenth and fourteenth defendants. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.