Malaysian International Trading Corp v Interamerica Asia: Breach of Trust, Conspiracy to Defraud, Dishonest Assistance

In Malaysian International Trading Corp Sdn Bhd v Interamerica Asia Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard a case regarding a massive fraud perpetrated against Malaysian International Trading Corporation Sdn Bhd (Mitco). Mitco claimed breach of trust, conspiracy to defraud, and dishonest assistance. The court found some defendants liable for conspiracy to defraud and dishonest assistance, awarding judgment for the plaintiff except in relation to the fourth, ninth, tenth, thirteenth and fourteenth defendants. IAG’s counterclaim against the plaintiff was dismissed.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiff except in relation to the fourth, ninth, tenth, thirteenth and fourteenth defendants. IAG’s counterclaim against the plaintiff dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Malaysian International Trading Corp suffered a massive fraud. The court found some defendants liable for conspiracy to defraud and dishonest assistance.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Malaysian International Trading Corp Sdn BhdPlaintiffCorporationJudgment for PlaintiffWon
Interamerica Asia Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment against DefendantLost
Interamerica International Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment against DefendantLost
Shunichi NonakaDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
Azalan Mior ZainadiDefendantIndividualJudgment for DefendantWon
Mohammed Amin NajibDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
Choo Siew LohkDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
Huangpu Industrial Holdings Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment for DefendantWon
Tiong Chiong HingDefendantIndividualJudgment for DefendantWon
Fu Rong HuaDefendantIndividualJudgment for DefendantWon
Wu Mun WaiDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
Huangpu Asia Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment for DefendantWon
Huangpu Holdings International Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment for DefendantWon
Inter-America’s Group LLCDefendantCorporationJudgment against DefendantLost
William Lindsay CannonDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
KD Energy Co LimitedOtherCorporation
Global Commodities (M) Sdn BhdOtherCorporation
Ecopal Trading Group LLCDefendantCorporationJudgment against DefendantLost
Ecopal IncDefendantCorporationJudgment against DefendantLost
Tsai Cheng WenDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
Excellead Sdn BhdOtherCorporation
EP Sdn BhdOtherCorporation
Flashy Properties LimitedDefendantCorporationJudgment against DefendantLost
Venture Trading Partners II LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment against DefendantLost
John DhillonDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Kew ChaiJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Mitco suffered a loss of US$75.1 million plus financing and other charges and losses.
  2. Mitco entered into 137 individual contracts of sale of palm olein.
  3. Two international fraudsters deployed the strategy of ‘buying high (from Mitco) and selling low’.
  4. Payments, if and when made, were only made to ensure that Mitco would enter into more contracts of sales.
  5. Nonaka and Cannon bribed an employee of Mitco, Mohammed Amin Najib.
  6. Najib received at least about US$1.2 million, most of which were deposited into his Kuala Lumpur bank accounts in cash.
  7. 84 LCs were opened or purportedly opened in respect of the contracts of sales between Mitco and IAG.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Malaysian International Trading Corp Sdn Bhd v Interamerica Asia Pte Ltd and Others, Suit 280/2000, [2002] SGHC 198

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Tiong Tack Kieng met Najib for the first time.
Tiong Tack Kieng travelled to Singapore and met Jeson, Lionel, Cindy and Mike Tiong.
Shipment loaded on m.v. Technochem.
Nonaka informed Tiong Tack Kieng by e-mail that Huangpu was taking over from Excellead.
Huangpu entered into an agreement with IAG to purchase 20,000 metric tons of palm olein from IAG each month.
Huangpu defaulted in their payments to IAG in relation to three shipments which were effected on m.v. Spring Grace, Yang Pu and Ussuryisk.
IAA incorporated in Singapore.
Dato Hamzah Bakar, the Chairman of Mitco learnt that there were invalid LCs in Mitco.
Board of Directors of Mitco convened.
Speeches delivered by the Law Lords in Twinsectra Limited v Yardley & others.
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Conspiracy to defraud
    • Outcome: The court found that Najib, Nonaka, Cannon and the IAG Parties had combined to defraud Mitco.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Dishonest assistance of breach of trust
    • Outcome: The court found that Lionel and Choo after they had joined Nonaka in IAA became aware of the fraud and were liable for dishonest assistance.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Liability for traceable proceeds
    • Outcome: The court declared that any of the parties found liable are holding any traceable proceeds of sale or equivalents thereof upon constructive trusts for Mitco.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary damages
  2. Tracing of assets

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of trust
  • Conspiracy to defraud
  • Dishonest assistance of breach of trust

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Commodities Trading

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Kuwait Oil Tanker Company SAK v Al BaderN/AYes[2000] 2 All ER (Comm) 271N/ACited regarding conspiracy to injure by unlawful means.
Agip v JacksonN/AYes[1990] 1 Ch 265N/ACited regarding dishonest behaviour that would make a person part of the fraud.
Royal Brunei Airlines v TanN/AYes[1995] 2 AC 378N/ACited regarding the test of dishonesty in accessory liability for breach of trust.
Twinsectra Limited v Yardley & othersN/AYes[2002] 2 WLR 802N/ACited regarding the test of dishonesty in accessory liability for breach of trust.
AG v ReidN/AYes[1994] 1 AC 324N/ACited regarding constructive trusts for bribes.
Sumitomo Bank Ltd v Kartika Ratna Thahire & OrsHigh Court of SingaporeYes[1993] 1 SLR 735SingaporeCited regarding constructive trusts for bribes.
Williams v BartonN/AYes[1927] 2 Ch 9N/ACited regarding constructive trusts for bribes.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Palm olein
  • Letters of credit
  • Constructive trust
  • Dishonest assistance
  • Traceable proceeds

15.2 Keywords

  • Fraud
  • Breach of Trust
  • Palm Olein
  • Singapore
  • Commercial Litigation

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Trust Law
  • Fraud
  • Commercial Law