Clarence Lee

Clarence Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and trademarks.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Clarence Lee has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and trademarks.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Entrapment	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Clarence Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Clarence Lee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	2 cases	100% of cases	Nike v Campomar: Res Judicata & Trade Mark Revocation for Non-Use of NIKE in Perfumery(Aug 2005) Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Controlled Drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Clarence Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Clarence Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nike v Campomar: Res Judicata & Trade Mark Revocation for Non-Use of NIKE in Perfumery 04 Aug 2005 Nike Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Aug 2005	Nike Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the dismissal of its opposition based on res judicata was dismissed.
2	Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Controlled Drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Sep 2004 Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey (Appellant)Lost	07 Sep 2004	Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for trafficking in a controlled drug was dismissed.