Clement Chen

Clement Chen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and torts. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Clement Chen has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and summary judgement.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admission of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Clement Chen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Singapore Rifle Association v Singapore Shooting Association: Negligence and Occupiers' Liability(Jul 2018) UTOC Engineering v ASK Singapore: Assessment of Damages for Defective Refractory Works(Oct 2017)
Attorney-General	1 cases	33% of cases	Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Clement Chen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Clement Chen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,024,732.85	2,512,366.432 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Rifle Association v Singapore Shooting Association: Negligence and Occupiers' Liability 22 Jul 2018 The Singapore Shooting Association (Respondent)Won	22 Jul 2018	The Singapore Shooting Association (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; SRA ordered to pay SSA the costs of this appeal fixed at $30,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	UTOC Engineering v ASK Singapore: Assessment of Damages for Defective Refractory Works 18 Oct 2017 ASK Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	18 Oct 2017	ASK Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Damages assessed against DefendantDamages assessed against the Defendant in the amount of $5,024,732.85 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice 16 Sep 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Lost	16 Sep 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application AllowedThe Attorney-General opposed the application, which was ultimately allowed.