Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice
In Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC, the High Court of Singapore heard an application by Mr. Beloff QC for ad hoc admission to represent nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd (NCA) in proceedings related to a scheme of arrangement for TT International Ltd. The application was opposed by the Monitoring Committee, the Company, the Law Society, and the Attorney-General. The court allowed the application, finding that the legal and factual issues were complex and that Mr. Beloff's expertise was needed. The underlying dispute concerned the validity of a second judgment by the Court of Appeal regarding NCA's fees and whether the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to make certain findings of fact.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Application Allowed
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Application for ad hoc admission of Mr. Beloff QC to represent nTan Corporate Advisory in proceedings related to a scheme of arrangement. Application allowed.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attorney-General | Respondent | Government Agency | Application Allowed | Lost | |
nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd | Other Party | Corporation | Neutral | Neutral | |
Law Society | Respondent | Association | Application Allowed | Lost | |
Beloff Michael Jacob QC | Applicant | Individual | Application Allowed | Won | |
TT International Ltd | Respondent | Corporation | Application Allowed | Lost | |
Monitoring Committee | Respondent | Association | Application Allowed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Judith Prakash | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Mr. Beloff QC applied for ad hoc admission to represent NCA in certain proceedings.
- NCA was the independent financial advisor of TT International Ltd.
- The application was opposed by the Monitoring Committee, the Company, the Law Society, and the Attorney-General.
- The underlying dispute concerned the validity of a second judgment by the Court of Appeal.
- The second judgment related to NCA's fees and whether the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to make certain findings of fact.
- NCA contended that the findings of fact and fee orders were made without jurisdiction and in breach of natural justice.
- NCA filed summonses seeking leave to intervene and set aside the second judgment.
5. Formal Citations
- Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC, Originating Summons No 1096 of 2012, [2013] SGHC 177
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
NCA appointed as independent financial advisor of TT International Ltd | |
Engagement letter signed between NCA and TT International Ltd | |
TT International Ltd applied for approval to summon a meeting of creditors | |
Engagement letter signed between NCA and TT International Ltd | |
Scheme Manager reported the Scheme passed by creditors | |
Court of Appeal allowed appeals against Scheme approval | |
Court of Appeal sanctioned the Scheme | |
Court of Appeal released full grounds of decision | |
Rajah & Tann LLP wrote to the Court of Appeal regarding VAF payment | |
Court of Appeal handed down a further written judgment | |
NCA filed Summons No 5682 of 2012 in CA 44 and Summons No 6520 of 2012 in CA 47 | |
Application filed for ad hoc admission of Mr. Beloff QC | |
Application of Mr Michael Jacob Beloff QC heard | |
Application allowed | |
Grounds of decision given |
7. Legal Issues
- Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel
- Outcome: The court allowed the application for ad hoc admission.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Special qualifications or experience
- Necessity for foreign counsel
- Availability of local counsel
- Related Cases:
- [2013] 1 SLR 872
- [2013] 3 SLR 66
- Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal
- Outcome: The court considered the issues raised by the Summonses involved questions of law and procedure which were fairly complex.
- Category: Jurisdictional
- Sub-Issues:
- Power to make determinations after primary function fulfilled
- Applicability of determinations to non-parties
- Related Cases:
- [2011] 1 SLR 998
- Breach of Natural Justice
- Outcome: The court considered whether there was a breach of natural justice in the way the question was dealt with.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Departure from due process
- Fair hearing rule
- Related Cases:
- [2011] 1 SLR 998
8. Remedies Sought
- Leave to Intervene
- Setting Aside of Judgment
9. Cause of Actions
- Lack of Jurisdiction
- Breach of Natural Justice
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
- Insolvency
- Ad Hoc Admissions
11. Industries
- Financial Advisory
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Re Andrews Geraldine Mary QC | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2013] 1 SLR 872 | Singapore | Cited for guidance on ad hoc admissions and balancing objectives. |
Re Caplan Jonathan Michael QC | High Court | Yes | [2013] 3 SLR 66 | Singapore | Cited for guidance on ad hoc admissions. |
The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly known as ABN Amro Bank NV) and others v TT International Ltd and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] SGCA 9 | Singapore | Cited as the full grounds of decision related to the scheme of arrangement. |
The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly known as ABN Amro Bank NV) and others v TT International Ltd and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] 2 SLR 213 | Singapore | Cited as the full grounds of decision related to the scheme of arrangement. |
The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly known as ABN Amro Bank NV) and others v TT International Ltd and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] 4 SLR 1182 | Singapore | Cited as the Second Judgment dealing with issues raised in correspondence. |
Re Econ Corp Ltd (in provisional liquidation) | High Court | Yes | [2004] 2 SLR(R) 264 | Singapore | Cited for principles stated in relation to assessment of professional fees. |
Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 v Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2011] 1 SLR 998 | Singapore | Cited for establishing that the Court of Appeal has inherent jurisdiction to reopen and rehear an issue decided in breach of natural justice. |
Marplan Private Limited v Attorney-General | High Court | Yes | [2013] 3 SLR 201 | Singapore | Cited to show that a challenge to the Second Judgment does not concern issues of administrative law. |
Abdul Wahab bin Sulaiman v Commandant, Tanglin Detention Barracks | High Court | Yes | [1985-1986] SLR(R) 7 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the High Court has no supervisory jurisdiction over superior courts. |
Re David Joseph QC | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] 1 SLR 791 | Singapore | Cited to show that the availability of local Senior Counsel is not an absolute bar to the admission of a Queen's Counsel. |
Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC | High Court | Yes | [2000] 1 SLR(R) 943 | Singapore | Cited to show that the Applicant was familiar with Singapore's legal procedure and system. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Legal Profession (Admission) Rules 2011 (S 244/2011) |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Ad Hoc Admission
- Scheme of Arrangement
- Value Added Fee
- Monitoring Committee
- Natural Justice
- Jurisdiction
- Senior Counsel
- Inherent Jurisdiction
- Judicial Review
15.2 Keywords
- Ad Hoc Admission
- Legal Profession Act
- Scheme of Arrangement
- Natural Justice
- Jurisdiction
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Admission of Advocates and Solicitors | 80 |
Jurisdiction | 75 |
Natural justice | 70 |
Company Law | 40 |
Contract Law | 30 |
Administrative Law | 30 |
Insolvency Law | 20 |
Judicial Review | 20 |
Summary Judgement | 10 |
Bankruptcy | 10 |
Arbitration | 10 |
16. Subjects
- Legal Profession
- Civil Procedure
- Insolvency Law