Crystal Ong

Crystal Ong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sexual offences. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Crystal Ong has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Aggravated Rape	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Attempted Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sodomy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Witness	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Intimidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Outraging Modesty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Crystal Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Crystal Ong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutors	5 cases	71% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Pausi bin Jefridin & Roslan bin Bakar: Trafficking Diamorphine & Methamphetamine(Apr 2010) Public Prosecutor v Mohammed Liton: Review of Rape and Sodomy Conviction After Admission of Evidence(Apr 2007) PP v Mohammed Liton: Rape, Sodomy, and Outraging Modesty Case(Oct 2006)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	29% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mervin Singh: Trafficking Diamorphine Case(Oct 2011) Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Crystal Ong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Crystal Ong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	3 21	Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2007	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Mervin Singh: Trafficking Diamorphine Case 04 Oct 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Oct 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedBoth accused were found guilty as charged.
2	Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Sep 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Sep 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted and sentenced to death.
3	Public Prosecutor v Pausi bin Jefridin & Roslan bin Bakar: Trafficking Diamorphine & Methamphetamine 21 Apr 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Apr 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedThe prosecution won the case against both accused.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mohammed Liton: Review of Rape and Sodomy Conviction After Admission of Evidence 02 Apr 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	02 Apr 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Original verdict and orders remain unchangedThe court found no reason to alter the original verdict and orders made at the end of the trial.
5	PP v Mohammed Liton: Rape, Sodomy, and Outraging Modesty Case 26 Oct 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	26 Oct 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Partial VictoryAccused found guilty of the fourth, sixth and seventh charges and convicted accordingly. Accused discharged and acquitted of the first, second, third, fifth, and eighth charges.
6	Public Prosecutor v MY: Attempted Rape Charge and Outrage of Modesty under Penal Code 25 May 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	25 May 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Partial LossAccused acquitted on attempted rape charge but convicted of outrage of modesty.
7	Public Prosecutor v MX: Sentencing for Rape and Aggravated Rape of Daughters 17 Apr 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Apr 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 32 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.