Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act

In Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah, the High Court of Singapore convicted Rosman bin Abdullah on 14 September 2010 for trafficking in diamorphine, violating the Misuse of Drugs Act. Rosman was found in possession of not less than 57.43 grams of diamorphine at the Strand Hotel. The court found Rosman's statements to CNB officers admitting the drugs were for sale to be reliable and rejected his defense that he believed he was only carrying Erimin. Rosman was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Convicted and sentenced to death.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Rosman bin Abdullah was convicted of trafficking diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act and sentenced to death. The court found his statements reliable.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWon
Toh Shin Hao of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Geraldine Kang of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Crystal Ong of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Rosman bin AbdullahDefendantIndividualConvictedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Toh Shin HaoAttorney-General’s Chambers
Geraldine KangAttorney-General’s Chambers
Crystal OngAttorney-General’s Chambers
Ram GoswamiK Ravi Law Corporation
Joseph TanDSCT Law Corporation

4. Facts

  1. Accused was found in possession of five packets containing not less than 57.43 grams of diamorphine.
  2. CNB officers raided Room 201 at Strand Hotel and found the accused with Aneeza.
  3. Accused told CNB officers that there were more drugs in the room safe and provided the combination.
  4. Aneeza testified that she and the accused consumed "Ice" in the hotel room.
  5. Accused admitted ownership of the red Nescafe bag and the four bundles inside the safe.
  6. Accused stated the heroin was "for me to sell."
  7. Accused's urine samples were positive for methamphetamine but not for morphine.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah, Criminal Case No 19 of 2010, [2010] SGHC 271

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused was born
Accused trafficked controlled drug at Strand Hotel
CNB officers conducted operation at Strand Hotel
Accused and Aneeza were arrested
Aneeza was released from prison
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Trafficking of Controlled Drugs
    • Outcome: The court found the accused guilty of trafficking diamorphine.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Admissibility of Statements
    • Outcome: The court ruled that the statements made by the accused were admissible as evidence.
    • Category: Procedural
  3. Presumption of Knowledge
    • Outcome: The court found that the accused was unable to rebut the presumption of knowledge of the nature of the drug.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Mandatory death sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Trafficking in a controlled drug

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 185Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 185, section 5(1)(a) read with section 5(2)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 185, section 33Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), section 122(6)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act, section 18(2)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act, section 17(c)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Trafficking
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • CNB
  • Strand Hotel
  • Ubat
  • Erimin
  • Nescafe bag
  • Section 122(6) CPC statement

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug trafficking
  • Diamorphine
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Singapore
  • Criminal law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Offenses