Daniel Chia

Daniel Chia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 40 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 10 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in succession law and trademarks. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 16 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Chia has demonstrated expertise across 126 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	24 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 24 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	14 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice19% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nominal damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statement of Affairs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freezing Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wasted Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guerrilla tactics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Convertible Loan Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gross overcharging	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common Interest Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Convertible Loan Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-Default	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Counterfeit Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Project	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Caveatable Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inverse Passing Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anticipatory Breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Chia has been affiliated with 10 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	14 cases	35% of cases	CUW v CUZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Feb 2023) Then Feng v Contingent Creditors: Debtor's Bankruptcy Application and Statement of Affairs(Jan 2022) Micro Tellers Network v Cheng Yi Han: Deceit Claim over Misappropriated Funds(Sep 2021)
Stamford Law Corporation	9 cases	23% of cases	Tembusu Growth Fund v ACTAtek: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract(Aug 2015) Olivine Capital v Chia Chin Yan: Contract Interpretation & Mistake in Sewer Damage Claim(Apr 2014) Airtrust v Kao Chai-Chau: Illegality & Indemnity in Joint Tortfeasorship(Feb 2014)
Wong & Leow LLC	6 cases	15% of cases	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Airtrust: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Apr 2011) Bidvest v Deacons: Escrow Agreement Dispute over US$4 Million Payout(Apr 2010) QB Net Co Ltd v Earnson Management: Inverse Passing Off, Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy(Oct 2006)
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	8% of cases	ADG v ADH: Construction of Will, Lapse of Residuary Gift, Intestate Succession Act(Sep 2009) Soh Beng Tee v Fairmount: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(May 2007) Fairmount Development v. Soh Beng Tee: Arbitration Award Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice(Oct 2006)
Drew & Napier	2 cases	5% of cases	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Law Society: Professional Conduct, Overcharging & Legal Profession Act(Nov 2006) Anthony Wee v Law Society: Application of Legal Profession Act on Solicitor Misconduct Allegations(Nov 2006)
Wong and Leow LLC	2 cases	5% of cases	Creative Technology v Cosmos Trade-Nology: Trade Mark Infringement & Damages(Jan 2004) Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings(Dec 2003)
Lawrence Wong & Co	1 cases	3% of cases	Ng Beng Siang v PP: Conspiracy & Trafficking of Diamorphine; Common Intention(Apr 2003)
Coleman Street Chambers LLC	1 cases	3% of cases	Sea Trucks Offshore Ltd v Roomans: Mareva Injunctions & Disclosure Obligations(Nov 2018)
Wong Partnership	1 cases	3% of cases	Samwoh Asphalt v Sum Cheong Piling: Unconscionability in Performance Guarantee Call(Dec 2001)
Prolegis LLC	1 cases	3% of cases	STS Seatoshore Group v Wansa Commodities: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute(Oct 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Chia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 16 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	3%
Lost	123.0 parties avg	3.0	30%
Neutral	22.5 parties avg	2.5	5%
Partial	53.4 parties avg	3.4	13%
Won	205.8 parties avg	5.8	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	43.8 parties avg	3.8
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2013	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2014	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2015	210.8 parties avg	10.8
2016	43.8 parties avg	3.8
2017	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	27.6 parties avg	7.6
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Chia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	12(30%)	30%
Neutral	2(5%)	5%
Partial	5(13%)	13%
Won	20(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,066,000.00	129,125.0016 cases	16
USD	2,880,000.00	1,440,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 40 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	STS Seatoshore Group v Wansa Commodities: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 21 Oct 2024 Wansa Commodities Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	21 Oct 2024	Wansa Commodities Pte Ltd (Defendant): Inquiry as to Damages DeclinedWansa's request for an inquiry as to damages was declined.
2	CUW v CUZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 05 Feb 2023 CUZ (Respondent)Won	05 Feb 2023	CUZ (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.
3	Then Feng v Contingent Creditors: Debtor's Bankruptcy Application and Statement of Affairs 02 Jan 2022 5 And 2 Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Jan 2022	5 And 2 Pte Ltd (Respondent): Successful OppositionSuccessfully opposed the bankruptcy application.
4	Micro Tellers Network v Cheng Yi Han: Deceit Claim over Misappropriated Funds 21 Sep 2021 5 And 2 Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Sep 2021	5 And 2 Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff on the deceit claim; damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Convexity Ltd v Phoenixfin Pte Ltd: Enforcement of Arbitration Award and Freezing Injunction 30 May 2021 Convexity Ltd (Applicant)Won	30 May 2021	Convexity Ltd (Applicant): Freezing injunction grantedFreezing injunction granted up to US$2.8 million.
6	Convexity Ltd v Phoenixfin Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award Based on Unpleaded Penalty Issue 18 Apr 2021 Convexity Ltd (Applicant)Partial	18 Apr 2021	Convexity Ltd (Applicant): Application to set aside the award granted in partApplication to set aside the award granted in part, specifically paragraphs 110-128 and 141(a) of the Award, on the Penalty Issue; and paragraphs 139-140 and 141(f) of the Award, on the tribunal’s costs decision.
7	BSM v BSN: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Breach of Natural Justice & Failure to Present Case 12 Aug 2019 BSM (Applicant)Lost	12 Aug 2019	BSM (Applicant): Applications DismissedBSM's applications to set aside the arbitral awards were dismissed, and BSM was ordered to pay the Companies’ costs in the sum of $28,000, inclusive of disbursements for both OS 747 and 748. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Sea Trucks Offshore Ltd v Roomans: Mareva Injunctions & Disclosure Obligations 15 Nov 2018 Sea Trucks Group Limited (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	15 Nov 2018	Sea Trucks Group Limited (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application to vary the disclosure obligations under the Mareva injunction disallowed.Application to vary the disclosure obligations under the Mareva injunction disallowed.
9	Millenia Pte Ltd v Dragages Singapore Pte Ltd: Building Façade Defects and Liability 10 Sep 2018 Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Third Party)Dismissed	10 Sep 2018	Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Third Party): Claim DismissedClaim Dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD for Singapore.
10	Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACTAtek, Inc: Damages for Anticipatory Breach of Contract and Loss of IPO Opportunity 18 Oct 2017 TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Oct 2017	TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff): PartialTembusu was awarded costs of S$5,000 from ACTAtek, Inc. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Tay Kar Oon v Tahir: Appeal Against Imprisonment for Contempt of Court 25 Apr 2017 Tahir (Respondent)Lost	25 Apr 2017	Tahir (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed as the court substituted the imprisonment with a fine.
12	Re Landau: Ad Hoc Admission for CMNC's Arbitration Award Challenge 27 Nov 2016 AEI Guatemala Jaguar Ltd (Respondent)Won	27 Nov 2016	AEI Guatemala Jaguar Ltd (Respondent): Opposition UpheldJaguar opposed the application for ad hoc admission, and the application was dismissed.
13	Tahir v Tay Kar Oon: Contempt of Court for Breaching Examination of Judgment Debtor and Mareva Injunction Orders 11 Apr 2016 Tahir (Plaintiff)Won	11 Apr 2016	Tahir (Plaintiff): Order of committal grantedOrder of committal granted against the Defendant.
14	Foo Jong Long Dennis v Ang Yee Lim Lawrence: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Conspiracy 27 Jan 2016 Dennis Foo Jong Long (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jan 2016	Dennis Foo Jong Long (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedAll claims dismissed.
15	Mount Eastern v H&C S Holdings: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Iron Ore Supply Dispute 11 Jan 2016 Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	11 Jan 2016	Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited (Plaintiff, Respondent): Applications granted in partLeave to enforce the Award as a judgment was granted. Costs awarded in the fixed sum of $18,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Motorola Solutions v Uzan: Common Interest Privilege and Waiver in Enforcing Foreign Judgments 02 Sep 2015 MELAHAT UZAN (Defendant)Won	02 Sep 2015	MELAHAT UZAN (Defendant): Application GrantedThe defendant's application was granted.
17	Tembusu Growth Fund v ACTAtek: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract 04 Aug 2015 TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff)Won	04 Aug 2015	TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedClaim allowed against ACTAtek, Inc for breach of contract; damages awarded in the amount of $1,500,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Olivine Capital v Chia Chin Yan: Contract Interpretation & Mistake in Sewer Damage Claim 08 Apr 2014 Chia Chin Yan (Respondent)Lost	08 Apr 2014	Chia Chin Yan (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the decision of the court below was set aside and Suit 762/2012 was remitted for trial.
19	Airtrust v Kao Chai-Chau: Illegality & Indemnity in Joint Tortfeasorship 13 Feb 2014 Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	13 Feb 2014	Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed for the commencement of third party proceedings.
20	Airtrust v Kao: Derivative Action, Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Receivership 13 Feb 2014 Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Feb 2014	Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to transfer control and conduct of the proceedings in Suit No 477 of 2012 to be transferred over and continued thereafter by the Receivers and Managers of the Plaintiff, Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Limited was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Olivine Capital v Lee Chiew Leong: Compromise Agreement & Liability for Negligence in Construction Project 05 Sep 2013 Chia Chin Yan (Defendant, Respondent)Won	05 Sep 2013	Chia Chin Yan (Defendant, Respondent): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim against the second defendant was struck out, and the second defendant was awarded costs of $10,000 (excluding disbursements which are to be paid on a reimbursement basis). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Mervin Singh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Presumption of Knowledge, and Rebuttal 07 Mar 2013 Second Appellant (Appellant)Lost	07 Mar 2013	Second Appellant (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the Second Appellant's appeal, concluding the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the second appellant was in possession of the pink box for the purposes of trafficking, and that he had knowledge that the pink box contained diamorphine.
23	Shaan Taseer v Aamna Taseer: Caveat Removal & Beneficiaries' Rights in Estate Property 16 Sep 2012 Aamna Taseer (Respondent)Won	16 Sep 2012	Aamna Taseer (Respondent): Caveat Removal UpheldThe Respondent's application to remove the caveat was upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Quek Hock Lye v PP: Criminal Conspiracy, Drug Trafficking & Constitutional Rights 08 Apr 2012 Quek Hock Lye (Appellant)Lost	08 Apr 2012	Quek Hock Lye (Appellant): Appeal DismissedQuek's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
25	Aamna Taseer v Shaan Taseer: Caveatable Interest in Unadministered Estate 09 Feb 2012 Aamna Taseer (Plaintiff)Won	09 Feb 2012	Aamna Taseer (Plaintiff): Prayers allowedPlaintiff's prayers 1 and 2 allowed; the defendants have failed to show any caveatable interest in 82 Cove Drive.
26	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Airtrust: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 10 Apr 2011 Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn (Plaintiff, Applicant)Partial	10 Apr 2011	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn (Plaintiff, Applicant): Leave to commence derivative proceedings granted in partLeave granted to commence derivative proceedings on claims related to KSCCI, Ribands, and Mega-Bond.
27	Bidvest v Deacons: Escrow Agreement Dispute over US$4 Million Payout 26 Apr 2010 Bidvest Australia Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2010	Bidvest Australia Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedBidvest's claim that Deacons wrongly paid out the Escrow Sum was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	ADG v ADH: Construction of Will, Lapse of Residuary Gift, Intestate Succession Act 27 Sep 2009 ADG (executor and trustee of the estate of B (alias C), deceased) (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2009	ADG (executor and trustee of the estate of B (alias C), deceased) (Plaintiff): Judgment in favor of PlaintiffThe court declared that the lapsed gift falls into the residuary estate and is divisible into thirds among the surviving sons. The applicant’s costs of the proceedings are to be paid out of the estate. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Soh Beng Tee v Fairmount: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 08 May 2007 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	08 May 2007	Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs awarded to Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd both here and below.
30	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Law Society: Professional Conduct, Overcharging & Legal Profession Act 26 Nov 2006 Law Society of Singapore (Defendant)Partial	26 Nov 2006	Law Society of Singapore (Defendant): Determination Partially AffirmedThe court affirmed the Law Society's determination in relation to the complaints relating to breach of rr 35(c) and (e) and the fixed deposit issue but was ordered to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of a disciplinary committee in relation to the complaint concerning the issue of the invoice for $612,300.
31	Anthony Wee v Law Society: Application of Legal Profession Act on Solicitor Misconduct Allegations 26 Nov 2006 The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	26 Nov 2006	The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Determination of Council AffirmedCourt affirmed the determination of the Council in relation to both complaints. Mr. Wee shall pay the Law Society’s costs in connection with this application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Fairmount Development v. Soh Beng Tee: Arbitration Award Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice 16 Oct 2006 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	16 Oct 2006	Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent): Award set asideAward set aside due to breach of natural justice. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	QB Net Co Ltd v Earnson Management: Inverse Passing Off, Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy 16 Oct 2006 QB Net Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Oct 2006	QB Net Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Action DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to the three defendants to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
34	Caterpillar Inc v Ong Eng Peng: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off 03 Apr 2006 Caterpillar Inc (Plaintiff)Won	03 Apr 2006	Caterpillar Inc (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; the court granted the injunctions sought to restrain the defendant from infringement of the plaintiff’s CAT marks and from passing off his goods and services as those of the plaintiff. The inquiry as to damages or an account of profits is to be conducted by the Registrar. The plaintiff is also awarded costs of the proceedings up to the stage of trial. Costs pertaining to the inquiry before the Registrar are reserved to the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Creative Technology v Cosmos Trade-Nology: Trade Mark Infringement & Damages 07 Jan 2004 Creative Technology Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	07 Jan 2004	Creative Technology Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages awarded in the amount of $80,000 for loss of profits and/or damages at large (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to USD amounts).
36	Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings 28 Dec 2003 Samsung Corp (Appellant)Won	28 Dec 2003	Samsung Corp (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; no application for summary judgement should be brought before the stay application has been finally disposed of. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	Creative Technology Ltd v Cosmos Trade-Nology Pte Ltd: Trademark Infringement & Director's Liability 25 Aug 2003 Creative Technology Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	25 Aug 2003	Creative Technology Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted in favor of the Plaintiff; restraining orders issued; order for delivery up or destruction of infringing reproductions; inquiry as to damages or account of profits ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
38	Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung Corp: Summary Judgment & Arbitration Stay Under Rules of Court 14 Aug 2003 Samsung Corp (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2003	Samsung Corp (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedSamsung's appeal was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay $5,000 in costs to CCR (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
39	Ng Beng Siang v PP: Conspiracy & Trafficking of Diamorphine; Common Intention 16 Apr 2003 Ng Beng Siang (Appellant)Lost	16 Apr 2003	Ng Beng Siang (Appellant): Appeal DismissedNg Beng Siang's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
40	Samwoh Asphalt v Sum Cheong Piling: Unconscionability in Performance Guarantee Call 04 Dec 2001 ECICS-COFACE Guarantee Company (Singapore) Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	04 Dec 2001	ECICS-COFACE Guarantee Company (Singapore) Ltd (Respondent): NeutralECICS ordered to repay S$500,000 to Samwoh upon receipt from SC Piling. This order does not affect any right of indemnity ECICS may have against Samwoh. (SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore).