Daniel Seow

Daniel Seow is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and injunctions. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Seow has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Services	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Seow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Seow has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Kazzaz v Standard Chartered Bank: Costs Allocation in Banking Services Dispute(Aug 2020) TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act(Jul 2020) Kazzaz v. Standard Chartered Bank: Negligent Misrepresentation & Banking Advice(Oct 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Seow's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.4
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	35.7 parties avg	5.7	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	25.4 parties avg	5.4

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Seow's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,093,143.32	3,546,571.662 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kazzaz v Standard Chartered Bank: Costs Allocation in Banking Services Dispute 30 Aug 2020 Naushid Mithani (Defendant)Won	30 Aug 2020	Naushid Mithani (Defendant): Legal fees and disbursements to be borne by PlaintiffsDefendants' legal fees of S$1,100,000 to be borne by Plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act 27 Jul 2020 TYN Investment Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jul 2020	TYN Investment Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Mareva Injunction GrantedMareva injunction granted against the first defendant up to the limit of $2,693,143.32 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Kazzaz v. Standard Chartered Bank: Negligent Misrepresentation & Banking Advice 13 Oct 2019 Naushid Mithani (Defendant)Won	13 Oct 2019	Naushid Mithani (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing all claims.
4	Gulf Hibiscus Ltd v Rex International Holding Ltd: Stay of Court Proceedings & Arbitration Scope 23 Aug 2017 Gulf Hibiscus Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	23 Aug 2017	Gulf Hibiscus Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal against the stay of court proceedings was dismissed.