Kazzaz v Standard Chartered Bank: Costs Allocation in Banking Services Dispute

In Sheila Kazzaz and Ahmed Kazzaz v Standard Chartered Bank, Laurence Black, Harish Phoolwani, and Naushid Mithani, the Singapore International Commercial Court, with Anselmo Reyes IJ presiding, addressed the allocation of costs following the dismissal of the Plaintiffs' claims. The court ordered the Plaintiffs to bear the Defendants' legal fees of S$1,100,000 and disbursements of S$113,177.12, £178,672.23, AED88,844.73, and US$4,336.83. The claim concerned the operation of the Plaintiffs’ Accounts, Facilities, and Transactions and the way in which the Defendants provided services in respect of those matters.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiffs to bear the Defendants' legal fees and disbursements.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Costs allocation in a dispute over banking services. The court ordered the plaintiffs to bear the defendants' legal fees and disbursements.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Standard Chartered BankDefendantCorporationLegal fees and disbursements to be borne by PlaintiffsWon
Sheila KazzazPlaintiffIndividualBear the Defendants' legal fees and disbursementsLost
Ahmed KazzazPlaintiffIndividualBear the Defendants' legal fees and disbursementsLost
Laurence BlackDefendantIndividualLegal fees and disbursements to be borne by PlaintiffsWon
Harish PhoolwaniDefendantIndividualLegal fees and disbursements to be borne by PlaintiffsWon
Naushid MithaniDefendantIndividualLegal fees and disbursements to be borne by PlaintiffsWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Anselmo ReyesInternational JudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiffs' claims against the Defendants were dismissed in a previous judgment.
  2. The Court of Appeal dismissed the Plaintiffs' appeal.
  3. The Defendants claimed legal fees of S$1,100,000 and disbursements in multiple currencies.
  4. The Plaintiffs argued that the Defendants should receive significantly less in legal fees and disbursements.
  5. An indemnity clause in the client agreements was a key point of contention.
  6. The Registrar directed that Appendix G of the Supreme Court Practice Directions should be relevant to the assessment of costs.
  7. The Plaintiffs maintained allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation and undue influence until just before closing submissions.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Sheila Kazzaz and another v Standard Chartered Bank and others, Suit No 4 of 2018, [2020] SGHC(I) 19

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Trial began
Trial
Trial
Trial
Judgment dismissing Plaintiffs’ claims issued
Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal
Court of Appeal handed down its reasons
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Allocation of Costs
    • Outcome: The court ordered the Plaintiffs to bear the Defendants' legal fees and disbursements.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Costs

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation

11. Industries

  • Banking

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Costs
  • Indemnity
  • Disbursements
  • Legal Fees
  • Appendix G
  • Full Indemnity Basis

15.2 Keywords

  • costs
  • legal fees
  • disbursements
  • indemnity
  • banking services
  • Singapore International Commercial Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Costs Allocation
  • Banking Services Dispute