Danna Er

Danna Er is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in building and construction contracts and construction law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Danna Er has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Danna Er has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Danna Er has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Danna Er has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Danna Er has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Danna Er has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Danna Er has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Danna Er has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Standard form contracts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Danna Er has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Singapore Institute of Architects standard form contracts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Danna Er has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Danna Er has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
MPillay	1 cases	100% of cases	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Summary Judgment, SIA Conditions, Construction Contract, Fraud(Mar 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Danna Er's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Danna Er's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	640,816.32	640,816.321 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Summary Judgment, SIA Conditions, Construction Contract, Fraud 03 Mar 2016 Ser Kim Koi (Appellant, Defendant)Won	03 Mar 2016	Ser Kim Koi (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; judgment and orders for costs entered below by the AR and the Judge are set aside; Appellant is to have his costs here and below; monies furnished by the Appellant as security for costs for this appeal and the sum of $640,816.32 ordered by the Judge to be paid into court by the Appellant are to be paid out to the Appellant. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.