Danny Quah

Danny Quah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and costs. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Danny Quah has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Retention of Title Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Party and party costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gross overcharging	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restraint Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Danny Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Danny Quah has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Providence Law Asia LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act(Jul 2020) Mitsubishi Corp v Kyen Resources: Retention of Title Clause & Unpaid Seller Rights(Mar 2019) Deepak Sharma v Law Society: Costs in Private Judicial Review(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Danny Quah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Danny Quah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Withdrawn	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	3,385,167.87	3,385,167.871 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Withdrawn: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act 27 Jul 2020 Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Defendant)Withdrawn	27 Jul 2020	Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Defendant): Application DiscontinuedApplication against the second defendant was discontinued due to a settlement.
2	Mitsubishi Corp v Kyen Resources: Retention of Title Clause & Unpaid Seller Rights 04 Mar 2019 Kyen Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	04 Mar 2019	Kyen Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of US$3,385,167.87.
3	Deepak Sharma v Law Society: Costs in Private Judicial Review 12 Jul 2017 Deepak Sharma (Appellant)Lost	12 Jul 2017	Deepak Sharma (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellant to pay costs to the Respondent and the Attorney-General. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Deepak Sharma v Law Society: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Proceedings for Excessive Party and Party Costs 15 Mar 2017 Deepak Sharma (Appellant)Lost	15 Mar 2017	Deepak Sharma (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the appellant's arguments were rejected.
5	Re Conchubar Aromatics Ltd: Interim Stay of Proceedings under Section 210(10) of the Companies Act 16 Dec 2015 Shefford Investments Holding Ltd (Applicant)Won	16 Dec 2015	Shefford Investments Holding Ltd (Applicant): Interim Stay of Proceedings GrantedRestraint order granted for 10 weeks, unless discharged earlier.