Re Conchubar Aromatics Ltd: Interim Stay of Proceedings under Section 210(10) of the Companies Act
The High Court of Singapore, in the case of Re Conchubar Aromatics Ltd, granted the applications of Conchubar Aromatics Ltd, UVM Investment Corporation, and Shefford Investments Holding Ltd for an interim stay of proceedings under section 210(10) of the Companies Act. The court, presided over by Aedit Abdullah JC, allowed the restraint order for 10 weeks to allow the companies to finalize discussions for a restructuring proposal. The court found that the proposal was sufficiently detailed and made bona fide, and that the companies had sufficient nexus to Singapore.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Restraint order granted for 10 weeks, unless discharged earlier.
1.3 Case Type
Insolvency
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court granted an interim stay of proceedings to Conchubar Aromatics Ltd under s 210(10) of the Companies Act, pending a creditors' meeting.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conchubar Aromatics Ltd | Applicant | Corporation | Interim Stay of Proceedings Granted | Won | |
UVM Investment Corporation | Applicant | Corporation | Interim Stay of Proceedings Granted | Won | |
Shefford Investments Holding Ltd | Applicant | Corporation | Interim Stay of Proceedings Granted | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Aedit Abdullah | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Danny Quah | Providence Law Asia LLC |
Vergis Abraham | Providence Law Asia LLC |
4. Facts
- Three applicant companies sought an interim stay of proceedings.
- Applicants were shareholders in Jurong Aromatics Corporation Pte Ltd.
- JAC was put into receivership in September 2015.
- Applicants hoped a restructuring proposal would rehabilitate their position.
- A moratorium was necessary to protect the Applicants’ ability to continue their efforts at restructuring.
- A creditor, SK Engineering & Construction Co, Ltd appeared, but did not contest the application for the moratorium at this time.
5. Formal Citations
- Re Conchubar Aromatics Ltd, Originating Summons Nos 1064, 1065 and 1066 of 2015, [2015] SGHC 322
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Jurong Aromatics Corporation Pte Ltd put into receivership. | |
Restraint order granted for 10 weeks. |
7. Legal Issues
- Interim Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome: The court granted the interim stay of proceedings.
- Category: Procedural
- Related Cases:
- [1990] 2 MLJ 180
- [2010] 2 SLR 617
- Bona Fides of Restructuring Proposal
- Outcome: The court found the restructuring proposal was made bona fide.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [1990] 2 MLJ 180
- Applicability of Section 210(10) to Foreign Companies
- Outcome: The court held that section 210(10) applies to foreign companies with sufficient nexus to Singapore.
- Category: Jurisdictional
- Related Cases:
- [2010] 2 SLR 617
8. Remedies Sought
- Interim Stay of Proceedings
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Insolvency
- Corporate Restructuring
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Re Kuala Lumpur Industries Bhd | High Court | Yes | [1990] 2 MLJ 180 | Malaysia | Cited as authority that a restraint order under s 210(10) of the Companies Act can be granted independent of the calling of a meeting under s 210(1). |
Re TPC Korea Co Ltd | High Court | Yes | [2010] 2 SLR 617 | Singapore | Cited for the proposition that the fact that the applicants were foreign companies would not obstruct the granting of a moratorium, as there was sufficient nexus to Singapore. |
Re GAE Pty Ltd | N/A | Yes | [1962] VR 252 | Australia | Cited for the principle that the particulars of the scheme gave more than a general layout, so that the court would be able to determine if the scheme was feasible, and that the intention to invoke the section was bona fide. |
Re Reid Murray Acceptance Ltd | N/A | No | [1964] VR 82 | Australia | Cited regarding whether an application should be made ex parte or inter partes. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) s 210(10) | Singapore |
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) s 210(1) | Singapore |
Companies Act s 210(11) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Interim Stay of Proceedings
- Restraint Order
- Section 210(10)
- Companies Act
- Restructuring Proposal
- Creditors' Meeting
- Bona Fides
- Winding Up
15.2 Keywords
- Insolvency
- Companies Act
- Restructuring
- Moratorium
- Stay of Proceedings
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Moratorium | 90 |
Insolvency Law | 80 |
Company Law | 75 |
Restraint Order | 65 |
Bankruptcy | 60 |
Injunctions | 50 |
Civil Procedure | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Insolvency
- Corporate Law
- Civil Procedure