David Chan

David Chan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 35 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and avoidance of transactions. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

David Chan has demonstrated expertise across 114 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	27 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 27 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	24 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 24 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	21 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transactions Defrauding Creditors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recipient liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Third-party litigation funding	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reverse Takeover	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Town Council Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Group Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charterparty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
False Representation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Secured Convertible Note	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debenture	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voyage Charterparty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive trustee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transaction at Undervalue	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Default Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Creditors Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debtor and Creditor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Transaction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

David Chan has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	14 cases	40% of cases	IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement(Nov 2018) Re Fan Kow Hin: Third-Party Litigation Funding in Bankruptcy & Assignment of Clawback Claims(Nov 2018) Attorney-General v Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council: Statutory Interpretation & Town Council's Access to Documents(Oct 2016)
Shook Lin & Bok	10 cases	29% of cases	Velstra Pte Ltd v Dexia Bank Belgium: Stay of Proceedings & Prejudice in Concurrent Criminal Case(Oct 2003) Mercator & Noordstar NV v Velstra Pte Ltd: Winding Up & Transaction at Undervalue(Sep 2003) Daewoo Singapore v CEL Tractors: Contractual Interest Dispute Over Late Payment for Heavy Machinery(Mar 2003)
Shook Lin and Bok	8 cases	23% of cases	Azero Investments SA v Velstra Pte Ltd: Unfair Preference & Constructive Trust in Insolvency(Sep 2005) Velstra Pte Ltd v Azero Investments SA: Director's Duties & Unfair Preference(Nov 2004) Velstra Pte Ltd v Dexia Bank NV: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Bankruptcy Act(Oct 2004)
ShookLin & Bok LLP	2 cases	6% of cases	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes(Aug 2010) Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit(Sep 2009)
Shook Lin and Bok LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Larsen Oil and Gas v Petroprod: Arbitration vs. Insolvency – Enforceability of Arbitration Clause in Liquidation(May 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of David Chan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 10 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Lost	137.0 parties avg	7.0	37%
Neutral	414.6 parties avg	14.6	11%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	6%
Won	152.6 parties avg	2.6	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	73.6 parties avg	3.6
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	211.5 parties avg	11.5
2010	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2018	216.9 parties avg	16.9

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of David Chan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	13(37%)	37%
Neutral	4(11%)	11%
Partial	2(6%)	6%
Won	15(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,300,000.00	415,000.0020 cases	20
USD	5,729,846.98	1,909,948.993 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	4 13	Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 13	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2004	7 223	Lost: 2 cases (28.6%) Partial: 2 cases (28.6%) Won: 3 cases (42.9%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2011	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 35 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement 26 Nov 2018 Teekay Group (Other)Neutral	26 Nov 2018	Teekay Group (Other): NeutralEntity from Teekay Group
2	Re Fan Kow Hin: Third-Party Litigation Funding in Bankruptcy & Assignment of Clawback Claims 25 Nov 2018 Defendants to High Court Suit No 1078 of 2017 (Respondent)Lost	25 Nov 2018	Defendants to High Court Suit No 1078 of 2017 (Respondent): Application DeniedThe defendants opposed the funding application, but the application was allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Attorney-General v Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council: Statutory Interpretation & Town Council's Access to Documents 27 Oct 2016 Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council (Other)Won	27 Oct 2016	Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council (Other): Access to Documents GrantedGranted access to Category 1 and Category 2 documents from AHTC, subject to conditions.
4	Humpuss Sea Transport v PT Humpuss: Inter-Company Loans & Restructuring 17 Oct 2016 Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	17 Oct 2016	Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Plaintiff): Applications DismissedStriking out application dismissed with costs fixed at $10,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Stay application dismissed in its entirety with costs fixed at $6,000 inclusive of disbursements. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Phang Choo Ong v Gilcom Investment: Stay of Winding Up Application 16 May 2016 LRG Investments Pte Ltd (Non-Party)Won	16 May 2016	LRG Investments Pte Ltd (Non-Party): Costs AwardedCosts of the application awarded to LRG fixed at S$8,000 inclusive of disbursements.
6	Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology: Minority Shareholder Rights & Corporate Mismanagement 08 Sep 2014 Sim City Technology Ltd (Respondent)Lost	08 Sep 2014	Sim City Technology Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, overturning the High Court's decision in favor of Sim City Technology Ltd.
7	Yeoh Wee Liat v Wong Lock Chee: Dispute over Share Ownership in Next Capital Pte Ltd 19 Aug 2013 Wong Lock Chee (Defendant)Lost	19 Aug 2013	Wong Lock Chee (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantCourt ordered Wong to rectify the share register of NCPL to reflect Yeoh's and HRT's entitlement to 33% of the shareholding in NCPL each (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Chen Chun Kang v Zhao Meirong: Enforcement of Default Judgment & False Representation 13 Dec 2011 Chen Chun Kang (Plaintiff)Neutral	13 Dec 2011	Chen Chun Kang (Plaintiff): Hearing AdjournedHearing of Summons adjourned to allow the Defendant a final opportunity to apply to set aside the Default Judgment.
9	Tan Holdings v Prosperity Steel: Receivership, Bonus Shares & Locus Standi 29 Sep 2011 Tan Holdings Pte Ltd (in creditor's voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Sep 2011	Tan Holdings Pte Ltd (in creditor's voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Norwest Holdings v Newport Mining: Share Capital Sale Dispute After Sichuan Earthquake 22 Aug 2011 Norwest Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	22 Aug 2011	Norwest Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedNorwest's appeal was dismissed.
11	Larsen Oil and Gas v Petroprod: Arbitration vs. Insolvency – Enforceability of Arbitration Clause in Liquidation 10 May 2011 Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Respondent)Won	10 May 2011	Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
12	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes 25 Aug 2010 Schroders plc (Other)Neutral	25 Aug 2010	Schroders plc (Other): NeutralWatching brief.
13	Petroprod Ltd v Larsen Oil and Gas: Stay of Action for Arbitration and Insolvency Law 29 Jun 2010 Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jun 2010	Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Plaintiff): Application for stay dismissedLarsen's application for a stay of the main action in favour of arbitration was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
14	Norwest Holdings v Newport Mining: Contract Law, Earthquake Impact & 'As Is, Where Is' Sale 06 May 2010 Norwest Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Lost	06 May 2010	Norwest Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedNorwest's claim for damages arising from Newport's failure to complete the purchase of the entire share capital of Norwest Chemicals was dismissed.
15	The "Asia Star": Mitigation of Damages in Voyage Charterparty Dispute 18 Mar 2010 Respondent (Malaysian Company) (Respondent)Lost	18 Mar 2010	Respondent (Malaysian Company) (Respondent): Damages AwardedDamages awarded in the amount of $399,500 (assumed USD, as the damages were calculated in USD). The appeal was allowed, but the respondent was still entitled to recover the sum of US$399,500, which is the additional expense that it would have been put to had it chartered the Puma, together with interest on that sum fixed at 3% per annum from the date on which the writ in the present action was filed until payment.
16	Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit 16 Sep 2009 Symphony Capital Partners (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Sep 2009	Symphony Capital Partners (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to expunge passages from affidavits dismissedDefendant's application under Summons No 4794 of 2009 is dismissed.
17	Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute 25 May 2009 Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	25 May 2009	Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Chesney Real Estate Group LLP against Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd for $8,284,000.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Azero Investments SA v Velstra Pte Ltd: Unfair Preference & Constructive Trust in Insolvency 18 Sep 2005 Velstra Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	18 Sep 2005	Velstra Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedVelstra's appeal was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Velstra Pte Ltd v Azero Investments SA: Director's Duties & Unfair Preference 08 Nov 2004 Velstra Pte Ltd (in compulsory winding up) (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Nov 2004	Velstra Pte Ltd (in compulsory winding up) (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for US$250,346.98 with interest at 8% from 18 December 2001 and costs.
20	Velstra Pte Ltd v Dexia Bank NV: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Bankruptcy Act 27 Oct 2004 Velstra Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	27 Oct 2004	Velstra Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be released to the respondent to account of the latter’s costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Bakery Mart v Ng Wei Teck: Setting Aside Consent Judgment for Receivership Claim 04 Oct 2004 Chay Fook Yuen Peter (Defendant)Won	04 Oct 2004	Chay Fook Yuen Peter (Defendant): Costs AwardedCosts awarded to D1 and D2 fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Sale of Goods, Metal Transactions & Liquidator's Rights 10 Jun 2004 RBG Resources plc (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Partial	10 Jun 2004	RBG Resources plc (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartRBG's claim was allowed, save for one drum of nickel. The sale proceeds of RBG’s metals are to be released to RBG or its solicitors, as RBG’s solicitors may direct. Damages to be paid to RBG for conversion of the nickel briquettes are the net purchase price or prices which CL has obtained for the same. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Lim Kok Koon v Tan Cheng Yew: Striking Out Writ of Summons & Partnership Liability 16 May 2004 Tan JinHwee Eunice & Lim ChooEng (Defendant)Won	16 May 2004	Tan JinHwee Eunice & Lim ChooEng (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe second defendant's appeal against the dismissal of their application to strike out the writ of summons was allowed.
24	Lim Kok Koon v Tan JinHwee Eunice: Appeal Timing Dispute in Fraud Claim Dismissal 17 Mar 2004 Tan JinHwee Eunice and Lim ChooEng (a firm) (Respondent)Won	17 Mar 2004	Tan JinHwee Eunice and Lim ChooEng (a firm) (Respondent): Motion grantedMotion to set aside the notice of appeal was initially granted, but the court then granted an extension of time to file the Notice of Appeal out of time and thus regularised the notice filed.
25	Velstra Pte Ltd v Dexia Bank: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Bankruptcy Act 12 Feb 2004 Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Feb 2004	Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.
26	Velstra Pte Ltd v Dexia Bank Belgium: Stay of Proceedings & Prejudice in Concurrent Criminal Case 20 Oct 2003 Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	20 Oct 2003	Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedDefendant's appeal was dismissed and costs of $2,000 were awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
27	Mercator & Noordstar NV v Velstra Pte Ltd: Winding Up & Transaction at Undervalue 22 Sep 2003 Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Dismissed	22 Sep 2003	Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe court declared that the plaintiff has not proven that the payment of US$5,080,000 made by Velstra to Mercator on 5 January 2000 constitutes a transaction at an undervalue within the meaning of s 98 of the Bankruptcy Act read with s 329 of the Companies Act. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Daewoo Singapore v CEL Tractors: Contractual Interest Dispute Over Late Payment for Heavy Machinery 30 Mar 2003 CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2003	CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's action was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Velstra Pte Ltd v Mercator & Noordstar NV: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Insolvency Law 23 Feb 2003 Velstra Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	23 Feb 2003	Velstra Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared the payment of US$5.08 million by Velstra Pte Ltd to Mercator & Noordstar NV null and void and ordered the recovery of that sum. Assumed USD, as the payment was made in USD.
30	Datawork Pte Ltd v Cyberinc Pte Ltd: Distributorship Agreement Dispute 24 Jun 2002 Datawork Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	24 Jun 2002	Datawork Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedDatawork's appeal was dismissed. The court found that Datawork was estopped from alleging that Cyberinc was in breach of contract. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Daewoo Singapore v CEL Tractors: Scheme of Arrangement & Third-Party Guarantees 19 Aug 2001 CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	19 Aug 2001	CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Security deposit released to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Daewoo Singapore v CEL Tractors: Scheme of Arrangement & Guarantor Release 19 Aug 2001 CEL Tractors Private Limited (Respondent)Won	19 Aug 2001	CEL Tractors Private Limited (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The security deposit together with the interest, if any, will be released to the respondents or their solicitors to account of costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	CEL Tractors Pte Ltd: Court Approval of Scheme of Arrangement and Discharge of Guarantor Liabilities 13 Apr 2001 CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	13 Apr 2001	CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedThe application to approve the scheme of arrangement was allowed.
34	Re Flint: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Mitco - Legal Profession Act 12 Mar 2001 Malaysian International Trading Corporation Sdn Bhd (Other)Neutral	12 Mar 2001	Malaysian International Trading Corporation Sdn Bhd (Other): NeutralMitco was the party seeking representation by Mr. Flint. The outcome of the application was neutral to their underlying suit.
35	Changhe International Investments v Banque International: Jurisdiction & Unless Order Default 03 Aug 2000 Banque International A Luxembourg Bil (Asia) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	03 Aug 2000	Banque International A Luxembourg Bil (Asia) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).