David Khoo

David Khoo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 40 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 78.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

David Khoo has demonstrated expertise across 83 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	37 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 37 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	32 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 32 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	17 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	12 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	9 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Murder	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Kidnapping	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Aggravated Rape	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Disability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Controlled Drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Importation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forensic Science	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extortion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Computer Misuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug-related Sexual Assault	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Transport Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Industry Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
State Entrapment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equal Protection	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agent Provocateur	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Carnal Intercourse Against the Order of Nature	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Computers and Software	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Information Technology Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Youthful Offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prison Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Capital Punishment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	David Khoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

David Khoo has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 24 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	24 cases	60% of cases	Muhammad Alif v Public Prosecutor: Aggravated Rape & Sexual Assault Sentencing Appeal(Nov 2021) Public Prosecutor v. Muhammad Alif bin Ab Rahim: Rape and Sexual Assault Sentencing(May 2021) Roger Yue Jr v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence for Rape and Sexual Penetration of a Minor(Feb 2019)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	9 cases	23% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohammad Johan bin Rashid: Culpable Homicide Arising from Uncontrolled Anger(Mar 2011) Chua Li Hoon Matilda v Public Prosecutor: False Trading & Falsifying Accounts under Securities Industry Act & Penal Code(May 2009) Took Leng How v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Adverse Inferences in Murder Conviction Appeal(Jan 2006)
Public Prosecutor	5 cases	13% of cases	PP v Yap Weng Wah: Sexual Offences Against Minors, Penal Code Section 376A(Mar 2015) Public Prosecutor v Tharema Vejayan: Murder, Intoxication, Diminished Responsibility, Provocation(Jun 2009) Public Prosecutor v Seah Kok Meng: Murder Charge for Death Outside Nikmath Restaurant(Feb 2001)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	2 cases	5% of cases	Shi Rongping v Public Prosecutor: False Declaration in Permanent Residence Application(Feb 2010) PP v Raffi Bin Jelan: Culpable Homicide, Robbery with Hurt, Films Act & Misuse of Drugs Act Offences(Jun 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of David Khoo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 3 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.5 parties avg	2.5	10%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	43.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Won	312.2 parties avg	2.2	78%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2001	52.2 parties avg	2.2
2004	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2010	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2018	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of David Khoo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(10%)	10%
Other	1(3%)	3%
Partial	4(10%)	10%
Won	31(78%)	78%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2001	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2010	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2018	4 13	Other: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 40 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Muhammad Alif v Public Prosecutor: Aggravated Rape & Sexual Assault Sentencing Appeal 16 Nov 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Nov 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
2	Public Prosecutor v. Muhammad Alif bin Ab Rahim: Rape and Sexual Assault Sentencing 11 May 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	11 May 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 28 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
3	Roger Yue Jr v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence for Rape and Sexual Penetration of a Minor 21 Feb 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Feb 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
4	Public Prosecutor v BQW: Sexual Assault by Penetration and Sentencing 03 Jun 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Jun 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Successful ProsecutionThe accused was convicted on all charges.
5	PP v Tan Meng Soon Bernard: Sexual Assault by Penetration of a Minor 31 May 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	31 May 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
6	Public Prosecutor v Koh Rong Guang: Statutory Rape, Sexual Assault, and Criminal Intimidation 10 May 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 May 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of the AccusedAccused convicted on 2nd to 6th charges and 8th to 12th charges (including the 7th charge in its amended form).
7	Public Prosecutor v ASR: Sentencing of Young Offender with Intellectual Disability for Rape & Sexual Assault 19 Apr 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Other	19 Apr 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Appeal pendingThe Prosecution has appealed against the decision to sentence the Accused to Reformative Training.
8	PP v Muhammad Nur Sallehin: Illegally Importing Methamphetamine 20 Nov 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Nov 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty.
9	Pram Nair v Public Prosecutor: Rape, Intoxication, and Consent 24 Sep 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	24 Sep 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial WinConviction affirmed. Sentence for rape affirmed; sentence for digital penetration reduced.
10	PP v Muhammad Nur Sallehin: Illegally Importing Controlled Drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act 10 May 2017 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Won	10 May 2017	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffAccused was convicted and sentenced.
11	Public Prosecutor v Lee Sze Yong: Kidnapping for Ransom and Statutory Interpretation 30 Nov 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Nov 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and convicted.
12	Public Prosecutor v AUB: Father Sentenced for Sexual Assault of Daughter 25 Jun 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Jun 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for the first charge and to 1 year’s imprisonment in respect of the second charge. Both imprisonment terms to run consecutively.
13	PP v Yap Weng Wah: Sexual Offences Against Minors, Penal Code Section 376A 19 Mar 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Mar 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
14	Public Prosecutor v Azuar Bin Ahamad: Rape, Sexual Assault, and Use of Stupefying Drugs 24 Jul 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Jul 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and sentenced.
15	Pathip Selvan v PP: Culpable Homicide & Provocation in Fatal Stabbing 14 Aug 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	14 Aug 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part, and the initial conviction of murder was overturned.
16	Public Prosecutor v Mohammad Johan bin Rashid: Culpable Homicide Arising from Uncontrolled Anger 27 Mar 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Mar 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 16 years' imprisonment and eight strokes of the cane.
17	Daniel Vijay v PP: Joint Murder Charge & Common Intention in Robbery 02 Sep 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	02 Sep 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossAppeal allowed in part for two of the appellants.
18	AKD v Public Prosecutor: Outraging Modesty of Domestic Worker - Appeal Against Conviction Allowed 12 Aug 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	12 Aug 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was set aside.
19	Lim Boon Keong v Public Prosecutor: Norketamine Consumption & Drug Law Compliance 22 Jun 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	22 Jun 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction was allowed.
20	Shi Rongping v Public Prosecutor: False Declaration in Permanent Residence Application 22 Feb 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	22 Feb 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the initial sentence of four weeks' imprisonment was replaced with a fine (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	PP v Iryan bin Abdul Karim: Sexual Assault, Hurt, Sodomy in Prison 29 Nov 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Nov 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of all accused personsThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Iryan bin Abdul Karim, Muhammad Hamdan bin Abdul Rahman, and Mohammed Zameen bin Abdul Manoff, securing convictions on multiple charges.
22	Public Prosecutor v Tharema Vejayan: Murder, Intoxication, Diminished Responsibility, Provocation 18 Jun 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Jun 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of murder.
23	Chua Li Hoon Matilda v Public Prosecutor: False Trading & Falsifying Accounts under Securities Industry Act & Penal Code 14 May 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	14 May 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeals against conviction dismissedAppeals against conviction dismissed.
24	Wong Hoi Len v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Taxi Driver While Intoxicated 01 Sep 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Sep 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Dismissed; Sentence IncreasedThe appeal was dismissed and the sentence was increased from one month to three months' imprisonment.
25	Mohamed Emran v PP: Drug Trafficking, State Entrapment & Constitutional Rights 26 Jun 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed.
26	Aw Bock Eng v Public Prosecutor: Road Traffic Act, Public Service Vehicle, and Insurance Policy 23 Aug 2007 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	23 Aug 2007	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment upheldThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.
27	Took Leng How v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Adverse Inferences in Murder Conviction Appeal 24 Jan 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Jan 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe conviction and mandatory death sentence were affirmed.
28	PP v Juminem: Diminished Responsibility & Provocation in Maid's Murder Case 04 Sep 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	04 Sep 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe Prosecution's charge of murder was not proven, but the accused were convicted of culpable homicide.
29	PP v Took Leng How: Murder, Diminished Responsibility & Schizophrenia 25 Aug 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Aug 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty as charged.
30	PP v Tan Ping Koon & Chua Ser Lien: Kidnapping for Ransom - Sentencing 08 Sep 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	08 Sep 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionBoth accused persons were convicted of kidnapping.
31	PP v Raffi Bin Jelan: Culpable Homicide, Robbery with Hurt, Films Act & Misuse of Drugs Act Offences 06 Jun 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	06 Jun 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused Raffi Bin Jelan sentenced to 20 years of preventive detention and 21 strokes of caning.
32	Kum Mun Hou v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine 08 May 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	08 May 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking.
33	Goh Chye Soon Jimmy v PP: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Possession of Controlled Drugs 22 Apr 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Apr 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
34	Lim Siong Khee v Public Prosecutor: Computer Misuse Act & Unauthorized Access to Email Account 08 Apr 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	08 Apr 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced.
35	Public Prosecutor v Seah Kok Meng: Murder Charge for Death Outside Nikmath Restaurant 04 Feb 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Feb 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on the charge of murder.
36	PP v Jingga bin Md Selamat: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted and sentenced to death (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
37	Public Prosecutor v Zulfikar bin Mustaffah: Trafficking of Diamorphine 05 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted as charged.
38	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Hamed bin Yahya: Outrage of Modesty and Carnal Intercourse Offences 21 Sep 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Sep 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was found guilty and sentenced.
39	Tan Boon San v PP: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Diamorphine Importation 11 Aug 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Aug 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe conviction and sentence of the appellant were affirmed.
40	PP v Tan Siew Lam: Trafficking of Morphine & Knowledge of Drug Possession under Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Aug 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Aug 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedThe accused were found guilty as charged.