Public Prosecutor v AUB: Father Sentenced for Sexual Assault of Daughter

In Public Prosecutor v AUB, the High Court of Singapore sentenced AUB to 12 years' imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for sexual assault by penetration and 1 year imprisonment for committing an obscene act against his biological daughter, V. The offences occurred in 2012 and 2013. The court considered a third charge during sentencing. The court emphasized the severity of the crimes, highlighting the breach of trust and the vulnerability of the victim.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for the first charge and to 1 year’s imprisonment in respect of the second charge. Both imprisonment terms to run consecutively.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

AUB was sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for sexual assault and an obscene act against his daughter. The High Court emphasized the severity of the crimes.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWon
David Khoo of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Joshua Lim of Attorney-General’s Chambers
AUBDefendantCorporationConvicted and SentencedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
David KhooAttorney-General’s Chambers
Joshua LimAttorney-General’s Chambers
Amarjit SinghGloria James-Civetta & Co
Javern SimGloria James-Civetta & Co

4. Facts

  1. The accused sexually assaulted his biological daughter.
  2. The victim was under 14 years old at the time of the offences.
  3. The sexual assault by penetration involved the accused inserting his middle finger into the victim's vagina.
  4. The obscene act involved the accused touching and rubbing the victim's vagina with his hand.
  5. The accused sent Facebook messages to the victim attempting to influence her to drop the case.
  6. The victim was found to have an old hymen tear.
  7. The victim was engaging in self-cutting behavior due to emotional distress.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v AUB, Criminal Case No 30 of 2015, [2015] SGHC 166

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Victim's date of birth
First charge of sexual assault by penetration occurred
Third charge of committing an obscene act occurred
Second charge of committing an obscene act occurred
Victim approached social worker
Police report lodged
Accused arrested
Accused released on police bail
Medical examination of victim
Accused sent private message to victim on Facebook
Accused sent private message to victim on Facebook
Report from Child Guidance Clinic on victim
Victim's medical report
Accused charged in court and remanded
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Sexual Assault by Penetration
    • Outcome: The accused was found guilty and sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Obscene Act
    • Outcome: The accused was found guilty and sentenced to 1 year’s imprisonment.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Consecutive vs Concurrent Sentencing
    • Outcome: The court ordered the imprisonment terms for the two charges to run consecutively.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2014] 2 SLR 998

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment
  2. Caning

9. Cause of Actions

  • Sexual Assault by Penetration
  • Obscene Act

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Public Prosecutor v BNNHigh CourtYes[2014] SGHC 7SingaporeCited for the principle that sexual penetration with a finger is a vicious violation of the female body.
GAJ v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2015] SGHC 134SingaporeCited for the principle that the highest end of the sentencing scale is reserved for cases in which the minor is particularly vulnerable and where the offender has exploited the minor to a significant degree.
PP v NFHigh CourtYes[2006] 4 SLR(R) 849SingaporeCited for the four broad categories of rape offences and the benchmark sentence for each of them.
Mohamed Shouffee bin Adam v Public ProsecutorUnknownYes[2014] 2 SLR 998SingaporeCited for the one-transaction rule, stating that consecutive sentences are not appropriate if the various offences involve a single invasion of the same legally protected interest.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) section 376(2)(a)Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 376(4)(b)Singapore
Children and Young Person’s Act (Cap 38, 2001 Rev Ed) section 7(a)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Sexual assault
  • Penetration
  • Obscene act
  • Child abuse
  • Abuse of trust
  • Vulnerable victim
  • Consecutive sentencing
  • Deterrent sentence

15.2 Keywords

  • sexual assault
  • child abuse
  • father
  • daughter
  • singapore
  • criminal law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Family Law