David Rasif

David Rasif is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder. Their track record shows a 18.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 18% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

David Rasif has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Murder	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Offences	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Confessions	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guardianship of Infants Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fellatio	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Order Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sodomy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
DNA Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Relationship Dispute	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domestic Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Paternity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	David Rasif has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

David Rasif has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Rasif and Partners	8 cases	73% of cases	AD v AE: Custody, Care, Control and Access Dispute Involving DNA Evidence and Paternity Presumption(Feb 2005) Lee Harith Gary v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal Dismissed(Nov 2004) Mohd Raffiq v PP: Murder Conviction Appeal - False Confessions & DNA Evidence(Jul 2004)
David Rasif & Partners	3 cases	27% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Sundaraju: Offence of Being Armed with Dangerous Instrument(Jul 2002) Wan Kamil v PP: Murder Conviction Upheld for Taxi Driver Killing; Common Intention & Duress Examined(Mar 2002) PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver(Nov 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of David Rasif's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 2 (18%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.5 parties avg	2.5	73%
Remanded	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	18%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	62.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of David Rasif's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(73%)	73%
Remanded	1(9%)	9%
Won	2(18%)	18%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Remanded: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	6 6	Lost: 6 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AD v AE: Custody, Care, Control and Access Dispute Involving DNA Evidence and Paternity Presumption 03 Feb 2005 AE (Respondent)Won	03 Feb 2005	AE (Respondent): Custody orders upheldCustody orders for the daughters to the respondent were upheld. Access to the son was reduced.
2	Lee Harith Gary v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal Dismissed 07 Nov 2004 Lee Harith Gary (alias Lee Cheng Thiam) (Appellant)Lost	07 Nov 2004	Lee Harith Gary (alias Lee Cheng Thiam) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the murder conviction was dismissed.
3	Mohd Raffiq v PP: Murder Conviction Appeal - False Confessions & DNA Evidence 23 Jul 2004 Mohd Raffiq Bin Mohd Aslam (Appellant)Lost	23 Jul 2004	Mohd Raffiq Bin Mohd Aslam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against his conviction for murder was dismissed.
4	Public Prosecutor v Lee Harith Gary: Murder Conviction for Pushing Girlfriend from Building 21 Apr 2004 Lee Harith Gary (alias Lee Cheng Thiam) (Defendant)Lost	21 Apr 2004	Lee Harith Gary (alias Lee Cheng Thiam) (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was found guilty of murder and sentenced according to the law.
5	AD v AE: Extension of Time to Serve Notice of Appeal in Child Custody Case 06 Apr 2004 AE (Respondent)Lost	06 Apr 2004	AE (Respondent): Lost AppealThe court held that no extension of time should be granted to the wife to enable her to serve the notice of appeal out of time. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Raffiq: Murder Conviction Based on Retracted Confession 16 Mar 2004 Mohd Raffiq Bin Mohd Aslam (Defendant)Lost	16 Mar 2004	Mohd Raffiq Bin Mohd Aslam (Defendant): Convicted of MurderAccused was found guilty of murder and sentenced to death.
7	PP v Abdul Aziz: Sodomy & Fellatio Sentencing - Penal Code s 377 27 Jan 2004 Abdul Aziz s/o Hameed Sultan @ Nur Mohammad Hafeez (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2004	Abdul Aziz s/o Hameed Sultan @ Nur Mohammad Hafeez (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedThe accused was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for the first charge and nine months’ imprisonment for the fourth charge, to be served concurrently.
8	AD v AE: Appeal on Custody Order - Extension of Time for Service of Notice of Appeal 21 Oct 2003 AE (Respondent, Appellant)Won	21 Oct 2003	AE (Respondent, Appellant): Extension of time to serve the Notice of Appeal grantedThe wife was granted an extension of time to serve the Notice of Appeal.
9	Public Prosecutor v Sundaraju: Offence of Being Armed with Dangerous Instrument 22 Jul 2002 Sundaraju s/o Munusamy (Respondent)Remanded	22 Jul 2002	Sundaraju s/o Munusamy (Respondent): Case RemittedCase remitted back to the court below for the defence to be called.
10	Wan Kamil v PP: Murder Conviction Upheld for Taxi Driver Killing; Common Intention & Duress Examined 06 Mar 2002 ROSLI BIN AHMAT (Appellant)Lost	06 Mar 2002	ROSLI BIN AHMAT (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe third appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
11	PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver 27 Nov 2001 ROSLI BIN AHMAT (Defendant)Lost	27 Nov 2001	ROSLI BIN AHMAT (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of murder under section 302 read with section 34 of the Penal Code and sentenced accordingly.