PP v Abdul Aziz: Sodomy & Fellatio Sentencing - Penal Code s 377

In Public Prosecutor v Abdul Aziz s/o Hameed Sultan @ Nur Mohammad Hafeez, the High Court of Singapore, on 28 January 2004, sentenced Abdul Aziz for committing sodomy and fellatio on an 18-year-old youth. The court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, considered the victim's low intelligence as an aggravating factor and the negligible penetration in the sodomy charge as a mitigating factor. Abdul Aziz was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for the sodomy charge and nine months’ imprisonment for the fellatio charge, to be served concurrently.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

The accused was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for sodomy and nine months’ imprisonment for fellatio, to be served concurrently.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Abdul Aziz was sentenced for sodomy and fellatio under s 377 of the Penal Code. The court considered the victim's low intelligence and negligible penetration as factors.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWon
Benjamin Yim of Public Prosecutor
Derek Kang of Public Prosecutor
Abdul Aziz s/o Hameed Sultan @ Nur Mohammad HafeezDefendantIndividualConvicted and SentencedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Benjamin YimPublic Prosecutor
Derek KangPublic Prosecutor
David RasifDavid Rasif and Partners

4. Facts

  1. The accused offered the victim $23 to wash aquariums in his flat.
  2. The accused stripped himself and told the youth to do the same or he would be assaulted.
  3. The accused committed sodomy and fellatio against the youth.
  4. The youth immediately lodged a police report against the accused.
  5. Medical reports indicated negligible penetration and superficial tears at the anal verge.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Abdul Aziz s/o Hameed Sultan @ Nur Mohammad Hafeez, CC 2/2004, [2004] SGHC 13

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Sexual offences committed
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Sentencing for Unnatural Offences
    • Outcome: The court considered the victim's low intelligence as an aggravating factor and the negligible penetration in the sodomy charge as a mitigating factor when determining the sentence.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Aggravating factors
      • Mitigating factors
      • Totality of punishment

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Sodomy
  • Fellatio

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
s 377 Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Sodomy
  • Fellatio
  • Unnatural offences
  • Penal Code s 377
  • Mitigating factors
  • Aggravating factors
  • Low intelligence
  • Negligible penetration
  • Anal verge

15.2 Keywords

  • Sodomy
  • Fellatio
  • Sentencing
  • Criminal Law
  • Singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing