David Tan Tee Boon

David Tan Tee Boon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and evidence law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Drug Possession	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Entrapment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Tan Tee Boon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

David Tan Tee Boon has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lawrence Chua & Partners	1 cases	25% of cases	Amran Bin Eusuff v PP: Drug Trafficking, Entrapment, & Admissibility of Confessions(Mar 2002)
Lawrence Chua and Partners	1 cases	25% of cases	Yap Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Trafficking Conviction Under Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2001)
Lawrence Chua & Pnrs	1 cases	25% of cases	PP v Amran bin Eusuff: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2001)
Helen Yeo & Partners	1 cases	25% of cases	PP v Yap Ah Chuan: Trafficking of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of David Tan Tee Boon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of David Tan Tee Boon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Amran Bin Eusuff v PP: Drug Trafficking, Entrapment, & Admissibility of Confessions 31 Mar 2002 Amran Bin Eusuff (Appellant)Lost	31 Mar 2002	Amran Bin Eusuff (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
2	PP v Amran bin Eusuff: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Dec 2001 Amran Bin Eusuff (Defendant)Lost	25 Dec 2001	Amran Bin Eusuff (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
3	Yap Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Trafficking Conviction Under Misuse of Drugs Act 16 Oct 2001 Yap Ah Chuan (Appellant)Lost	16 Oct 2001	Yap Ah Chuan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
4	PP v Yap Ah Chuan: Trafficking of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act 06 Aug 2001 Yap Ah Chuan (Defendant)Lost	06 Aug 2001	Yap Ah Chuan (Defendant): GuiltyThe accused was found guilty of trafficking in diamorphine.