PP v Amran bin Eusuff: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act
Amran bin Eusuff and Rabu bin Rahmat were jointly charged with drug trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act in Singapore. The High Court, presided over by Judicial Commissioner Tay Yong Kwang, found both accused guilty. The case involved an undercover operation where the accused were caught delivering cannabis. Both accused were convicted and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty due to the quantity of drugs involved.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Guilty as charged; mandatory death sentence passed on both accused.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Amran bin Eusuff and Rabu bin Rahmat were convicted of drug trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act for dealing in cannabis.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Prosecution | Government Agency | Guilty as charged | Won | Amarjit Singh of Attorney-General’s Chambers Eddy Tham of Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Amran Bin Eusuff | Defendant | Individual | Guilty as charged | Lost | |
Rabu Bin Rahmat | Defendant | Individual | Guilty as charged | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Tay Yong Kwang | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Amarjit Singh | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Eddy Tham | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Luke Lee | Luke Lee & Co |
David Tan Tee Boon | Lawrence Chua & Pnrs |
Johan Ismail | Johan Ismail & Co |
Ho Meng Hee | Ho Meng Hee & Co |
Johan Ho Meng Hee | Ho Meng Hee & Co |
4. Facts
- CNB officer posed as a buyer of cannabis.
- Amran (Daud) negotiated the drug deal with the undercover officer.
- Rabu (Abu) delivered the cannabis at Bukit Merah View.
- Both accused were arrested after the delivery.
- The delivered substance was 2174.86 grams of cannabis.
- Rabu's urine sample tested positive for cannabis.
- Amran was promised a commission for the drug deal.
5. Formal Citations
- Public Prosecutor v Amran bin Eusuff and Another, CC 55/2001, [2001] SGHC 376
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
CPL Fazuri contacted about a cannabis buyer | |
CPL Fazuri negotiates cannabis purchase with Daud and Abu | |
Drug deal takes place; Amran and Rabu arrested | |
Accused persons' urine samples obtained | |
Investigating Officer recorded a long statement from the First Accused | |
Investigating Officer recorded a long statement from the Second Accused | |
Investigating Officer recorded further statements from both accused | |
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Drug Trafficking
- Outcome: Both accused found guilty of drug trafficking.
- Category: Substantive
- Admissibility of Statements
- Outcome: Statements admitted as evidence after trial within a trial.
- Category: Procedural
- Related Cases:
- [1999] 2 SLR 181
8. Remedies Sought
- Conviction
- Mandatory Death Sentence
9. Cause of Actions
- Drug Trafficking
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chin Seow Noi & Ors v PP | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1994] 1 SLR 135 | Singapore | Cited for the application of Section 30 of the Evidence Act regarding the use of a co-accused's confession. |
Gulam bin Notan & Anor v PP | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1999] 2 SLR 181 | Singapore | Cited regarding the burden of proof for voluntariness of statements. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 185 | Singapore |
Penal Code, Chapter 224 | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code | Singapore |
Evidence Act | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Cannabis
- Drug Trafficking
- Undercover Operation
- Controlled Drug
- Common Intention
- Agent Provocateur
- CNB
- Ganja
15.2 Keywords
- Drug Trafficking
- Cannabis
- Singapore
- Criminal Law
- Misuse of Drugs Act
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act | 95 |
Criminal Law | 60 |
Criminal Procedure | 50 |
Evidence | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Drug Offences