Dawn Chew

Dawn Chew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in unfair preferences and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dawn Chew has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidator	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agreements for leases	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fire Safety Engineering	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dawn Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dawn Chew has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	4 cases	100% of cases	SM Integrated Transware v Schenker Singapore: Lease Agreement Dispute(Mar 2005) Fire-Stop Marketing v Mae Engineering: Construction Contract Dispute over Fire-Rated Board Cladding Payment(May 2004) Show Theatres v Shaw Theatres: Unfair Preference in Company Winding Up(Oct 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dawn Chew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	50%
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dawn Chew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	505,691.85	252,845.932 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SM Integrated Transware v Schenker Singapore: Lease Agreement Dispute 29 Mar 2005 SM Integrated Transware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Mar 2005	SM Integrated Transware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $505,691.85, plus costs and interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Fire-Stop Marketing v Mae Engineering: Construction Contract Dispute over Fire-Rated Board Cladding Payment 30 May 2004 MAE Engineering Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 May 2004	MAE Engineering Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissed with costsDefendant's counterclaim dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Show Theatres v Shaw Theatres: Unfair Preference in Company Winding Up 04 Oct 2002 Eng Wah Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 Oct 2002	Eng Wah Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, payments received deemed unfair preference and recoverable by the liquidator.
4	Show Theatres Pte Ltd v Shaw Theatres: Avoidance of Transactions & Unfair Preference 27 Mar 2002 Eng Wah Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	27 Mar 2002	Eng Wah Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent): Claims dismissedThe liquidator's claims against Eng Wah Investments Pte Ltd were dismissed with costs to be paid by the applicant.