Dawn Tan

Dawn Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in en bloc sales and strata title law. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dawn Tan has demonstrated expertise across 50 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sales	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking Out Applications	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Piercing corporate veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pledge of Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Pledgee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dawn Tan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	4 cases	67% of cases	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Strata Titles Board Powers(Oct 2007) Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Application for En Bloc Sale Intervention(Sep 2007) Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim(Sep 2007)
Eldan Law LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	Rankine v Chenet: Share Transfer Dispute & Summary Judgment Appeal(Mar 2011)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	AAR v AAS: Interlocutory Injunction Variation and Preservation of Status Quo in Philippine Asset Purchase Dispute(Jun 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dawn Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.9
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Neutral	47.2 parties avg	7.2	67%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	47.4 parties avg	7.4
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dawn Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Neutral	4(67%)	67%
Partial	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,000.00	500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	4 121	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2009	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rankine v Chenet: Share Transfer Dispute & Summary Judgment Appeal 30 Mar 2011 Rankine Bernadette Adeline (Plaintiff, Appellant)Neutral	30 Mar 2011	Rankine Bernadette Adeline (Plaintiff, Appellant): Conditional leave to defend granted to DefendantThe Plaintiff's appeal was partially successful in that the Defendant was granted conditional leave to defend.
2	AAR v AAS: Interlocutory Injunction Variation and Preservation of Status Quo in Philippine Asset Purchase Dispute 07 Jun 2009 AAR (Applicant)Neutral	07 Jun 2009	AAR (Applicant): Injunction maintainedThe injunction in favour of the applicants was not varied further.
3	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Strata Titles Board Powers 10 Oct 2007 Others (Second Intervener)Neutral	10 Oct 2007	Others (Second Intervener): NeutralThe intervener's position was noted but no specific outcome was assigned.
4	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Application for En Bloc Sale Intervention 30 Sep 2007 Reghenzani Claude Augustus (Applicant)Neutral	30 Sep 2007	Reghenzani Claude Augustus (Applicant): OtherApplication to intervene allowed.
5	Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim 20 Sep 2007 Beckkett Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Sep 2007	Beckkett Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Nominal Damages AwardedNominal damages of $1000 awarded due to failure to prove undervalue. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Sin Lian Heng Construction v Singapore Telecommunications: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications 14 Feb 2007 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	14 Feb 2007	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part in relation to paragraphs 19, 19(a) – (d) and Prayer 3 of the Defence and Counterclaim. Costs be in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.