Dawn Tan Ly-Ru

Dawn Tan Ly-Ru is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and contracts. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reverse Takeover	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fund Raising	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Marine Propulsion Units	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dawn Tan Ly-Ru has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
ADTvance Law LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Rosman bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Sentencing(Nov 2016) Leong Hin Chuee v Citra Group: Breach of Employment Agreement & Director's Duties(Jan 2015) Pacific Marine v Xin Ming Hua: Defective Marine Propulsion Units & Breach of Contract(May 2014)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Sin Lian Heng Construction v. Singapore Telecommunications: Breach of Contract & Cable Recovery Dispute(Aug 2010) Yickvi Realty v Pacific Rover: Easement Dispute over Road Realignment(Sep 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dawn Tan Ly-Ru's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.5 parties avg	3.5	80%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dawn Tan Ly-Ru's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,719,211.90	573,070.633 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rosman bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Sentencing 20 Nov 2016 Rosman bin Abdullah (Appellant)Lost	20 Nov 2016	Rosman bin Abdullah (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, death sentence affirmed.
2	Leong Hin Chuee v Citra Group: Breach of Employment Agreement & Director's Duties 28 Jan 2015 Leong Hin Chuee (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jan 2015	Leong Hin Chuee (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for breach of employment agreement dismissed.
3	Pacific Marine v Xin Ming Hua: Defective Marine Propulsion Units & Breach of Contract 25 May 2014 Xin Ming Hua Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 May 2014	Xin Ming Hua Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for wrongful rejection of the Propulsion Units was dismissed.
4	Sin Lian Heng Construction v. Singapore Telecommunications: Breach of Contract & Cable Recovery Dispute 01 Aug 2010 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	01 Aug 2010	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of Singtel in the sum of $1,719,211.90, with interest from the date of writ to date of judgment at 5.33% per annum. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Yickvi Realty v Pacific Rover: Easement Dispute over Road Realignment 17 Sep 2009 Yickvi Realty Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	17 Sep 2009	Yickvi Realty Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Yickvi was not entitled to an injunction to restrain Pacific Rover from realigning the road. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.