Dipti Jauhar

Dipti Jauhar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and property law. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated expertise across 47 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Housing and Development Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit-linked notes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Structured Notes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
HDB Resale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Assistance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Purchases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dipti Jauhar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dipti Jauhar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Premier Law LLC	5 cases	71% of cases	Soon Kok Tiang v DBS Bank: Credit-Linked Notes, High Notes 5, Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy(Nov 2011) CRW v PT Perusahaan Gas Negara: Enforcing DAB Decisions in Construction Arbitration(Jul 2011) Soon Kok Tiang v DBS: High Notes 5 Voidance Claim Over Lehman-Linked Notes(Dec 2010)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	29% of cases	Oei Karen v Ng Yee Hoon: Mistake, Duress & Contract Law(Feb 2008) Oei Tjiong Bin v Tsu Soo Sin: Loan Recovery & Equitable Assignment Dispute(Dec 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dipti Jauhar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	57%
Won	32.8 parties avg	2.8	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dipti Jauhar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	980,000.00	245,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Soon Kok Tiang v DBS Bank: Credit-Linked Notes, High Notes 5, Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy 01 Nov 2011 Soon Kok Tiang and others (Appellant)Lost	01 Nov 2011	Soon Kok Tiang and others (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs.
2	CRW v PT Perusahaan Gas Negara: Enforcing DAB Decisions in Construction Arbitration 12 Jul 2011 CRW Joint Operation (Appellant)Lost	12 Jul 2011	CRW Joint Operation (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court upheld the decision to set aside the Final Award. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Soon Kok Tiang v DBS: High Notes 5 Voidance Claim Over Lehman-Linked Notes 09 Dec 2010 Soon Kok Tiang (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Dec 2010	Soon Kok Tiang (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedThe plaintiffs' claim for a declaration that the Notes issued under the HN5 contract are void is dismissed.
4	Muharrem Unsal v M K Sivalingam Jaganathan: Specific Performance of HDB Flat Sale Agreement Dispute 17 Aug 2010 Muharrem Unsal (Plaintiff)Won	17 Aug 2010	Muharrem Unsal (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted in favor of the Purchaser and order specific performance of the Contract between the Vendors and Purchaser. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	PT Perusahaan Gas Negara v CRW Joint Operation: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Exceeding Mandate 19 Jul 2010 CRW Joint Operation (Respondent)Lost	19 Jul 2010	CRW Joint Operation (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the Majority Award was dismissed with the costs of the proceedings to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Oei Karen v Ng Yee Hoon: Mistake, Duress & Contract Law 27 Feb 2008 Ng Yee Hoon (Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2008	Ng Yee Hoon (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Oei Tjiong Bin v Tsu Soo Sin: Loan Recovery & Equitable Assignment Dispute 13 Dec 2007 Siong Guan Company (Private) Limited (Plaintiff)Won	13 Dec 2007	Siong Guan Company (Private) Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in favour of the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).