Edmond Pereira

Edmond Pereira is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 39 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 5.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 5% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edmond Pereira has demonstrated expertise across 141 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	22 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	18 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	13 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	12 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	11 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty as to materials and workmanship	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to design	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Running Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor-client relationship	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alteration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Intimidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Electronic Records	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Standard of Proof for Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Limitation Period	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Acknowledgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Acts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corruption	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commodities Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money-changing and Remittance Businesses Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
United Nations Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Probation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gratification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bribery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Policies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gang Related Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment of Cheating	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of solicitor to client	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accidental Drowning	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Weapons Charges	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proof of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sanctions Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Pereira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edmond Pereira has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Edmond Pereira & Partners	21 cases	54% of cases	Mitfam v Motley: Dispute over Cashew Nut Payments and Contract Breach(Dec 2013) LTT Global Consultants v BMC Academy: Breach of Contract & Profit Sharing Dispute(Mar 2011) Hong Investment v Tai Thong Hung: Application to Remove Liquidators for Cause(Dec 2010)
Edmond Pereira Law Corporation	13 cases	33% of cases	Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner'(Nov 2019) PP v Tan Kok Ming: Corruption of Foreign Public Official & Sentencing Framework(Sep 2019) Public Prosecutor v Wee Teong Boo: Rape, Sexual Assault, Outrage of Modesty(Aug 2019)
Edmond Pereira and Partners	5 cases	13% of cases	Rabiah Bee v Salem Ibrahim: Amendment of Claim After Trial, Fiduciary Duty & Joint Venture Dispute(Jan 2006) Khor Kok Soon v PP: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure(Nov 2005) Lim Thian Lai v PP: Admissibility of Statements & Conviction for Arms Offenses Act Violation(Nov 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edmond Pereira's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 2 (5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	282.7 parties avg	2.7	72%
Partial	92.3 parties avg	2.3	23%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2001	42.4 parties avg	2.4
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	24.6 parties avg	4.6
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2019	42.8 parties avg	2.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edmond Pereira's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	28(72%)	72%
Partial	9(23%)	23%
Won	2(5%)	5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	205,556.46	12,847.2816 cases	16
USD	981,079.52	490,539.762 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2001	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2018	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 3 cases (75.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 39 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner' 14 Nov 2019 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (suing on behalf of itself and all subsidiary proprietors of Northstar @ AMK) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	14 Nov 2019	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (suing on behalf of itself and all subsidiary proprietors of Northstar @ AMK) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe MCST's appeal was allowed in part regarding the admissibility of LOAs.
2	PP v Tan Kok Ming: Corruption of Foreign Public Official & Sentencing Framework 05 Sep 2019 Tan Kok Ming, Michael (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	05 Sep 2019	Tan Kok Ming, Michael (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedTan's appeal against his sentence was dismissed.
3	Public Prosecutor v Wee Teong Boo: Rape, Sexual Assault, Outrage of Modesty 29 Aug 2019 Wee Teong Boo (Defense)Partial	29 Aug 2019	Wee Teong Boo (Defense): PartialAccused acquitted on rape charge, but convicted of sexual assault by penetration and outrage of modesty. Ordered to pay compensation of $1,200 being the consultation costs incurred by V for psychotherapy. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Management Corporation v Orion-One: Construction Defects & Contractor Negligence 26 Mar 2019 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Mar 2019	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff in part in respect of the defects the court found Orion-One and Sanchoon to be liable for. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Super Group Ltd v Mysore Nagaraja Kartik: Breach of Contract, Electronic Records & Limitation 13 Sep 2018 Mysore Nagaraja Kartik (Defendant)Lost	13 Sep 2018	Mysore Nagaraja Kartik (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantInterlocutory judgment entered against the defendant for US$600,000 (assumed USD, as the debt was denominated in USD).
6	Rohini Balasubramaniam v HSR International Realtors: Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Property Transactions 04 Jul 2018 Rohini d/o Balasubramaniam (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	04 Jul 2018	Rohini d/o Balasubramaniam (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; Rohini is entitled to 30% of the amount claimed due to contributory negligence. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Public Prosecutor v Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar: Drug Trafficking, Retraction of Guilty Plea 20 Mar 2018 Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar (Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2018	Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar (Defendant): Application to retract plea of guilt dismissed; sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment with 15 strokes of the cane.The defendant's application to retract his guilty plea was dismissed, and he was sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment with 15 strokes of the cane.
8	PP v Tan Kok Leong: Doctor Convicted of Outrage of Modesty and Drug Administration for Sexual Offenses 30 Jul 2017 Tan Kok Leong (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	30 Jul 2017	Tan Kok Leong (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Accused's appeals against conviction and sentence were dismissed.
9	Public Prosecutor v Pannir Selvam Pranthaman: Misuse of Drugs Act - Knowledge of Diamorphine Importation 26 Jun 2017 Pannir Selvam Pranthaman (Accused)Lost	26 Jun 2017	Pannir Selvam Pranthaman (Accused): GuiltyAccused was found guilty of importing diamorphine and sentenced to death.
10	Chinpo Shipping v Public Prosecutor: DPRK Sanctions & Remittance Business 11 May 2017 Chinpo Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd (Appellant)Partial	11 May 2017	Chinpo Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partConviction and sentence on the DPRK Regulations Charge set aside; fine of S$80,000 paid in relation to the DPRK Regulations Charge to be refunded. Conviction on the MCRBA Charge upheld.
11	Public Prosecutor v Sim Wei Liang Benjamin: Statutory Rape, Sexual Penetration, and Offences Against Children 13 Sep 2015 Sim Wei Liang Benjamin (Defendant)Lost	13 Sep 2015	Sim Wei Liang Benjamin (Defendant): Sentenced to imprisonment and caningAccused sentenced to imprisonment and caning. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Lau Tyng Tyng v Lau Boon Wee: Construction of Will & Enforceability of Conditions 09 Jun 2014 Lau Tyng Tyng (Applicant)Lost	09 Jun 2014	Lau Tyng Tyng (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application was dismissed, and she was ordered to pay costs of $6,000 inclusive of disbursements to the respondent. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
13	Mitfam v Motley: Dispute over Cashew Nut Payments and Contract Breach 15 Dec 2013 Mitfam International Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	15 Dec 2013	Mitfam International Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of US$381,079.52 after deduction of US$14,586.48 for the defendant's counterclaim.
14	Liau Cheng Mee James v Liau Ee Ling Julie: Estate Expenses & Will Interpretation 30 Jul 2013 Liau Cheng Mee James (Plaintiff)Partial	30 Jul 2013	Liau Cheng Mee James (Plaintiff): Claims largely allowedDeclaration granted for expenses of $6,476.90 and $11,879.56. Sum of $6,476.90 to be paid to the plaintiffs from the estate. Declaration granted for sum of $66,100 being commission paid to property agents. Balance proceeds in the OCBC estate account to be distributed in equal shares. Costs to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiffs, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	LTT Global Consultants v BMC Academy: Breach of Contract & Profit Sharing Dispute 31 Mar 2011 BMC Academy Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	31 Mar 2011	BMC Academy Pte Ltd (Defendant): Damages to be paidDamages to be assessed and paid to the plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Hong Investment v Tai Thong Hung: Application to Remove Liquidators for Cause 27 Dec 2010 Tai Thong Hung Plastics Industries (Pte) Ltd (Respondent)Lost	27 Dec 2010	Tai Thong Hung Plastics Industries (Pte) Ltd (Respondent): Liquidators RemovedLiquidators removed from the company.
17	PP v Md Mosharaf: Culpable Homicide, Illegal Entry, Extortion, Strangulation 09 Jul 2009 Mamun (Defendant)Lost	09 Jul 2009	Mamun (Defendant): Convicted of Culpable HomicideSentenced to four years' imprisonment for culpable homicide and a separate sentence for immigration offences.
18	PP v Muhammad Zulkahil: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide and Unlawful Assembly in Motorcycle Gang Assault 29 Mar 2009 Nur Rizal Bin Mohamed Zainul (Defendant)Lost	29 Mar 2009	Nur Rizal Bin Mohamed Zainul (Defendant): SentencedSentenced to eight years imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane for culpable homicide, and 12 months’ imprisonment and six strokes of the cane for causing hurt, to run consecutively.
19	Rabiah Bee v Salem Ibrahim: Fiduciary Duties, Partnership, Joint Ventures & Solicitor-Client Relationship in Property Investment 22 Feb 2007 Rabiah Bee Bte Mohamed Ibrahim (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Feb 2007	Rabiah Bee Bte Mohamed Ibrahim (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for an account and for damages was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Lim Pei Ni Charissa v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Abetment of Cheating Conviction and Sentence 19 Jul 2006 Lim Pei Ni Charissa (Appellant)Partial	19 Jul 2006	Lim Pei Ni Charissa (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowedAppeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed. Appellant placed on probation. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Rabiah Bee v Salem Ibrahim: Amendment of Claim After Trial, Fiduciary Duty & Joint Venture Dispute 26 Jan 2006 Rabiah Bee Bte Mohamed Ibrahim (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Jan 2006	Rabiah Bee Bte Mohamed Ibrahim (Plaintiff): Statement of Claim allowed to be further amendedStatement of Claim allowed to be further amended, though not to the extent requested by the plaintiff.
22	Khor Kok Soon v PP: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure 10 Nov 2005 Khor Kok Soon (Appellant)Lost	10 Nov 2005	Khor Kok Soon (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
23	Lim Thian Lai v PP: Admissibility of Statements & Conviction for Arms Offenses Act Violation 03 Nov 2005 Lim Thian Lai (Appellant)Lost	03 Nov 2005	Lim Thian Lai (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
24	PP v Khor Kok Soon: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure 14 Jul 2005 Khor Kok Soon (Defendant)Lost	14 Jul 2005	Khor Kok Soon (Defendant): ConvictedThe Defendant was convicted and sentenced.
25	PP v Chia Teck Leng: Forgery, Fraud, and Abuse of Trust in Banking and Commerce 01 Apr 2004 Chia Teck Leng (Defendant)Lost	01 Apr 2004	Chia Teck Leng (Defendant): Accused Found GuiltyAccused sentenced to 42 years’ imprisonment.
26	Low Siew Hwa Kenneth v PP: Criminal Breach of Trust & Cheating Appeal 28 Aug 2003 Low Siew Hwa Kenneth (Appellant)Lost	28 Aug 2003	Low Siew Hwa Kenneth (Appellant): Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
27	Public Prosecutor v Poh Teck Huat: Rash Driving, Causing Death, Sentencing Appeal 08 Apr 2003 Poh Teck Huat (Respondent)Lost	08 Apr 2003	Poh Teck Huat (Respondent): Original Sentence Set AsideThe original sentence of a fine of $8,000 was set aside and replaced with a four-week imprisonment sentence.
28	Progress Software v CPF Board: Interpretation of 'Payable' under CPF Act 27 Feb 2003 Central Provident Fund Board (Respondent)Won	27 Feb 2003	Central Provident Fund Board (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
29	Lwee Kwi Ling Mary v Public Prosecutor: Application to Suspend Sentence Pending Presidential Petition 26 Feb 2003 Lwee Kwi Ling Mary (Applicant)Lost	26 Feb 2003	Lwee Kwi Ling Mary (Applicant): Motion dismissedThe court dismissed the applicant's motion to suspend her sentence.
30	Lwee Kwi Ling Mary v Quek Chin Huat: Criminal Intimidation with Weapon & Private Defence 25 Feb 2003 Lwee Kwi Ling Mary (Appellant)Lost	25 Feb 2003	Lwee Kwi Ling Mary (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against sentence dismissed; sentence enhanced to three months' imprisonment.
31	Progress Software v Central Provident Board: CPF Contributions & Wage Classification 07 Aug 2002 Central Provident Board (Defendant)Won	07 Aug 2002	Central Provident Board (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Central Provident Board. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Chua Tiong Tiong v PP: Corruption, Sentencing, and Public Interest 15 Jul 2001 Chua Tiong Tiong (Appellant)Lost	15 Jul 2001	Chua Tiong Tiong (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed; Sentence EnhancedAppeal dismissed and sentence enhanced to 48 months imprisonment and a fine of $100,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	Tan Yeow Khoon v Law Society: Misleading the Court & Solicitor's Duty 06 Jun 2001 Tan Yeow Lam (Applicant)Lost	06 Jun 2001	Tan Yeow Lam (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
34	Yap Chwee Khim v American Home Assurance: Insurance Claim Dispute over Accidental Drowning 08 Apr 2001 Yap Chwee Khim (Appellant)Lost	08 Apr 2001	Yap Chwee Khim (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court found that Madam Yap had not discharged the burden of proof to show that the deceased died from accidental drowning. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Chow Mun Fai v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Possession of Diamorphine 26 Mar 2001 Chow Mun Fai (Appellant)Lost	26 Mar 2001	Chow Mun Fai (Appellant): Appeal dismissedChow Mun Fai's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
36	Suboh bin Ramli v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 15 Nov 2000 Suboh bin Ramli (Appellant)Lost	15 Nov 2000	Suboh bin Ramli (Appellant): Appeal DismissedSuboh's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
37	Yap Chwee Khim v American Home Assurance: Insurance Claim Dispute over Accidental Drowning 07 Sep 2000 Yap Chwee Khim (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Sep 2000	Yap Chwee Khim (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against all five Defendants failed.
38	Fong Ser Joo William v PP: Corruption, Police Officer, Accepting Gratification 31 Aug 2000 Fong Ser Joo William (Appellant)Lost	31 Aug 2000	Fong Ser Joo William (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
39	PP v Vincent Lee: Kidnapping for Ransom of Schoolgirl - Life Imprisonment Sentence 03 May 2000 Vincent Lee Chuan Leong (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	03 May 2000	Vincent Lee Chuan Leong (Defendant, Appellant): Life imprisonment without caningThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment without caning.