Public Prosecutor v Sim Wei Liang Benjamin: Statutory Rape, Sexual Penetration, and Offences Against Children

In Public Prosecutor v Sim Wei Liang Benjamin, the High Court of Singapore sentenced Sim Wei Liang Benjamin for multiple offences against four young female victims. The charges included statutory rape, aggravated sexual penetration, procurement of an obscene act, and possession of a film without a valid certificate. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment and caning, ordering some of the imprisonment terms to run consecutively.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused sentenced to imprisonment and caning.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Sim Wei Liang Benjamin was sentenced for multiple offences against young girls, including statutory rape and sexual penetration. The High Court sentenced him to imprisonment and caning.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencySentenced to imprisonment and caningWon
Zhong Zewei of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Sean Lee of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Sim Wei Liang BenjaminDefendantIndividualSentenced to imprisonment and caningLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Zhong ZeweiAttorney-General’s Chambers
Sean LeeAttorney-General’s Chambers
Edmond PereiraEdmond Pereira Law Corporation
Vickie TanEdmond Pereira Law Corporation

4. Facts

  1. The accused befriended four young girls via Facebook using a false identity.
  2. The accused engaged in sexual acts with the victims, including statutory rape and aggravated sexual penetration.
  3. The accused procured naked photographs from one of the victims.
  4. The accused possessed a video film without a valid certificate.
  5. The victims were between 11 and 13 years old at the time of the offences.
  6. The accused gave the victims money and mobile phones.
  7. The offences occurred in the accused's home, a shopping mall, and a taxi.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Sim Wei Liang Benjamin, Criminal Case No 35 of 2015, [2015] SGHC 240

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused born
Accused procured an obscene act by V1
Aggravated sexual penetration of V2 occurred
V2 added the accused as a friend on Facebook
V4 sent the accused a video film
Statutory rape against V2 occurred
Aggravated sexual penetration of V2 occurred
Mother of V1 and V2 discovered the handphone given to V2
Police report lodged
Statutory rape against V3 occurred
Aggravated sexual penetration of V3 occurred
Obscene act committed on V3
Accused arrested
Accused charged in court
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Statutory Rape
    • Outcome: The accused was found guilty of statutory rape.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2006] 4 SLR(R) 849
  2. Aggravated Sexual Penetration
    • Outcome: The accused was found guilty of aggravated sexual penetration.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2015] 3 SLR 297
  3. Procurement of an Obscene Act
    • Outcome: The accused was found guilty of procuring an obscene act.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Possession of Film Without Valid Certificate
    • Outcome: The accused was found guilty of possessing a film without a valid certificate.
    • Category: Substantive
  5. Sentencing Principles
    • Outcome: The court considered the principles of deterrence, retribution, and prevention of crime in determining the appropriate sentence.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2014] 2 SLR 998

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment
  2. Caning
  3. Fine

9. Cause of Actions

  • Statutory Rape
  • Aggravated Sexual Penetration
  • Procuring Obscene Act
  • Possession of Film Without Valid Certificate

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Public Prosecutor v NFHigh CourtYes[2006] 4 SLR(R) 849SingaporeCited for the classification of rape offences.
Public Prosecutor v Yap Weng WahHigh CourtYes[2015] 3 SLR 297SingaporeCited to suggest a sentence for penis-mouth penetration.
Mohamed Shouffee bin Adam v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2014] 2 SLR 998SingaporeCited for the principles of sentencing.
AQW v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2015] SGHC 134SingaporeCited regarding sentencing for CYPA charges and penetration offences.
Public Prosecutor v Qiu ShuihuaHigh CourtYes[2015] 3 SLR 949SingaporeCited regarding sentencing for penetration offences.
Public Prosecutor v Ng Kean Meng TerenceHigh CourtYes[2015] SGHC 164SingaporeCited regarding sentencing for penetration offences.
Public Prosecutor v Mohammed Liton Mohammed Syeed MallikCourt of AppealYes[2008] 1 SLR(R) 601SingaporeCited for approving the benchmarks in PP v NF.
Public Prosecutor v UICourt of AppealYes[2008] 4 SLR(R) 500SingaporeCited for approving the benchmarks in PP v NF.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) Section 375(1)(b)Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) Section 375(2)Singapore
Children and Young Persons Act (Cap 38, 2001 Rev Ed) s 7Singapore
Penal Code s 376A(1)(b)Singapore
Penal Code s 376A(3)Singapore
Penal Code s 376A(1)(a)Singapore
Films Act (Cap 107, 1998 Rev Ed) s 21(1)(a)Singapore
Films Act (Cap 107, 1998 Rev Ed) s 21(1)(i)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Statutory Rape
  • Aggravated Sexual Penetration
  • Obscene Act
  • Films Act
  • Paedophile
  • Victim Impact Statement
  • Consecutive Imprisonment
  • Mitigation Plea

15.2 Keywords

  • statutory rape
  • sexual penetration
  • child abuse
  • internet grooming
  • sentencing

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sexual Offences
  • Child Protection