Edmund Jerome Kronenburg

Edmund Jerome Kronenburg is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 18.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated expertise across 70 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undertaking as to Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gynaecology	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commodities Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money had and received	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inquiry as to damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prenuptial Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Destruction of Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edmund Jerome Kronenburg has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Braddell Brothers LLP	7 cases	70% of cases	Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Summary Judgment Appeal for US$1.95M Loan Dispute(Oct 2023) Yuen v Ng: Medical Negligence & Expert Reports in Singapore High Court(Jul 2020) Jen Shek Wei v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Professional Misconduct(Nov 2017)
Tan Peng Chin LLC	2 cases	20% of cases	Neo Kok Eng v Yeow Chern Lean: Conversion, Restitution, and Tracing of Funds(Sep 2008) Kunal Gobind Lalchandani v LU: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Specific Performance(Mar 2006)
Bradell Brothers LLP	1 cases	10% of cases	Astro v Ayunda Prima: Inquiry into Damages for Mareva Injunctions & Tribunal Jurisdiction(Mar 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edmund Jerome Kronenburg's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 4 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	10%
Lost	64.4 parties avg	4.4	60%
Neutral	111.0 parties avg	11.0	10%
Stayed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edmund Jerome Kronenburg's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(9%)	9%
Lost	6(55%)	55%
Neutral	1(9%)	9%
Stayed	1(9%)	9%
Won	2(18%)	18%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3
USD	1,950,000.00	1,950,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	2 11	Stayed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Summary Judgment Appeal for US$1.95M Loan Dispute 02 Oct 2023 Wang Piao (Claimant, Respondent)Won	02 Oct 2023	Wang Piao (Claimant, Respondent): Judgment for ClaimantSummary judgment granted for the claimant in the sum of US$1.95m, together with interest thereon.
2	Yuen v Ng: Medical Negligence & Expert Reports in Singapore High Court 05 Jul 2020 Yuen Minglan Helga Mrs Minglan Helga Alle (executrix of the estate of Mrs Yuen Ingeborg Nee Santjer, deceased) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Dismissed	05 Jul 2020	Yuen Minglan Helga Mrs Minglan Helga Alle (executrix of the estate of Mrs Yuen Ingeborg Nee Santjer, deceased) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal struck outAppeal struck out for being irregular.
3	Jen Shek Wei v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Professional Misconduct 12 Nov 2017 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	12 Nov 2017	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Disciplinary Tribunal's decision was upheld.
4	BASF Intertrade AG v H&C S Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 07 Aug 2017 BASF Intertrade AG Singapore Branch (Plaintiff)Stayed	07 Aug 2017	BASF Intertrade AG Singapore Branch (Plaintiff): Category 2 proceedings stayed in favour of arbitration and a case management stay is granted in respect of the Category 1 Agreements.Category 2 proceedings are stayed in favour of arbitration and a case management stay is granted in respect of the Category 1 Agreements.
5	Astro v Ayunda Prima: Inquiry into Damages for Mareva Injunctions & Tribunal Jurisdiction 10 Mar 2016 PT Direct Vision (Defendant)Neutral	10 Mar 2016	PT Direct Vision (Defendant): Application for inquiry as to damages dismissedFM's applications for an inquiry as to damages are dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	AQN v AQO: Prenuptial Agreement, Anti-Suit Injunction & Child Custody Dispute in Divorce Proceedings 26 Jan 2015 AQN (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	26 Jan 2015	AQN (Appellant, Defendant): Appeals dismissedHusband's appeals (RAS 48/2014, RAS 49/2014, and RAS 50/2014) were dismissed. Costs will follow the event and shall be taxed if not agreed. The parties may, alternatively, apply for costs to be fixed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Sandra Chew v Woo Kah Wai: Breach of Contract for Property Option 27 Jun 2013 Another (Defendant)Lost	27 Jun 2013	Another (Defendant): Damages to be paidDamages are to be paid by the Defendants to the Plaintiff, the quantum of which is the difference between the market value of the Property as at the intended date of completion (on or around 10 May 2010) and the original purchase price of $920,000. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Re Joseph David QC: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Complex International Arbitration Dispute 11 Dec 2011 PT First Media TBK (formerly known as PT Broadband Multimedia TBK) (Respondent)Lost	11 Dec 2011	PT First Media TBK (formerly known as PT Broadband Multimedia TBK) (Respondent): Application DeniedThe respondent's objection to the application was not successful.
9	Neo Kok Eng v Yeow Chern Lean: Conversion, Restitution, and Tracing of Funds 14 Sep 2008 Yeow Chern Lean (Defendant)Lost	14 Sep 2008	Yeow Chern Lean (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaims against Yeow Chern Lean were largely successful for the plaintiffs.
10	Kunal Gobind Lalchandani v LU: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Specific Performance 21 Mar 2006 LU (Defendant)Lost	21 Mar 2006	LU (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for specific performance and misappropriated funds.