Edwin Cai

Edwin Cai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and arbitration. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edwin Cai has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in admiralty and maritime law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Admiralty and Maritime Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery of Cargo	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Time Bar Defence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Time-Bar	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edwin Cai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edwin Cai has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
DennisMathiew	2 cases	67% of cases	Portigon v The "Titan Unity": Joinder of Third Parties and Consolidation of Disputes in International Arbitration(Feb 2014) The "Titan Unity": Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration for Misdelivery of Cargo Claim(Dec 2013)
AsiaLegal LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Batavia EXIMP v Owner of Vessels: Stay of Proceedings & Time-Bar Waiver in Admiralty Dispute(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edwin Cai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edwin Cai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Stayed	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	5,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Stayed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Batavia EXIMP v Owner of Vessels: Stay of Proceedings & Time-Bar Waiver in Admiralty Dispute 30 May 2021 Owner of the vessels Ever Golden & 9 Ors (Respondent)Won	30 May 2021	Owner of the vessels Ever Golden & 9 Ors (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Batavia to pay costs of the appeals fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Portigon v The "Titan Unity": Joinder of Third Parties and Consolidation of Disputes in International Arbitration 03 Feb 2014 Oceanic (Defendant)Stayed	03 Feb 2014	Oceanic (Defendant): Action stayed in favour of arbitrationAction against Oceanic was stayed in favour of arbitration at the Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	The "Titan Unity": Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration for Misdelivery of Cargo Claim 18 Dec 2013 Oceanic (Defendant, Applicant)Won	18 Dec 2013	Oceanic (Defendant, Applicant): Stay GrantedOceanic's application for a stay of the admiralty action in favor of arbitration is granted.