Edwin San

Edwin San is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 30 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edwin San has demonstrated expertise across 61 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	27 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 27 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	24 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 24 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	16 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offences	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abduction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Overcharging	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causing Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
General exceptions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Post-traumatic stress syndrome	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attempt to Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auxiliary Police Regulations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Intimidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intoxication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Defence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Right to Counsel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Mark Infringement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxi Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edwin San has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	11 cases	37% of cases	Ho Sheng Yu Garreth v PP: Unlicensed Moneylending, Repeat Offender Penalties(Jan 2012) Lee Ngiap Han v Public Prosecutor: Taxi Driver Conviction for Overcharging and Taximeter Violation(Oct 2010) Dong Ching Jit v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Conviction Allowed(Aug 2010)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	8 cases	27% of cases	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal on Drug Trafficking Charges(Dec 2009) Aam Usup v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Theft as Domestic Worker(Oct 2009) Public Prosecutor v Wan Chin Hon: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Deliberately Driving Motorcyclist Off Road(Jul 2005)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	8 cases	27% of cases	Tan Chin Heng v Public Prosecutor: Impersonating a Police Officer & Criminal Force(Jan 2011) Lim Pang Howe Harry v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Intimidation and Causing Hurt(Mar 2010) PP v Lim Ah Seng: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing Factors in Domestic Abuse Case(Jul 2006)
DPPs	2 cases	7% of cases	PP v Tan Chor Jin: Arms Offences Act - Intent to Cause Physical Injury(May 2007) Jin Yugang v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Upheld Despite Intoxication Defence(May 2003)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Yeo Kang Oh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edwin San's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	72.1 parties avg	2.1	23%
Unknown	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Won	172.2 parties avg	2.2	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2001	62.3 parties avg	2.3
2003	62.2 parties avg	2.2
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edwin San's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(13%)	13%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	7(23%)	23%
Unknown	1(3%)	3%
Won	17(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 12	Unknown: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2001	6 114	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 4 cases (66.7%)
2003	6 33	Partial: 3 cases (50.0%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2004	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 30 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ho Sheng Yu Garreth v PP: Unlicensed Moneylending, Repeat Offender Penalties 29 Jan 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	29 Jan 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulFines and caning reduced; imprisonment term undisturbed.
2	Tan Chin Heng v Public Prosecutor: Impersonating a Police Officer & Criminal Force 10 Jan 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Jan 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by Tan Chin Heng was dismissed.
3	Lee Ngiap Han v Public Prosecutor: Taxi Driver Conviction for Overcharging and Taximeter Violation 28 Oct 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Oct 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction.
4	Dong Ching Jit v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Conviction Allowed 19 Aug 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	19 Aug 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was overturned.
5	Lim Pang Howe Harry v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Intimidation and Causing Hurt 09 Mar 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	09 Mar 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially allowedThe appeal was partially allowed as the sentence for criminal intimidation was reduced.
6	Yong Vui Kong v PP: Extension of Time to Appeal Mandatory Death Sentence 30 Dec 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	30 Dec 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe applicant was allowed to proceed with his appeal.
7	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal on Drug Trafficking Charges 02 Dec 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	02 Dec 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Stay of execution grantedStay of execution granted pending a decision by the Court of Appeal.
8	Aam Usup v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Theft as Domestic Worker 05 Oct 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Oct 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.
9	Tan Chor Jin v PP: Arms Offenses, Intoxication, Accident, Private Defence & Right to Counsel 17 Jul 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	17 Jul 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal.
10	PP v Tan Chor Jin: Arms Offences Act - Intent to Cause Physical Injury 21 May 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 May 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty as charged.
11	PP v Lim Ah Seng: Culpable Homicide, Sentencing, Spousal Abuse & Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 25 Mar 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	25 Mar 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence imposedThe court sentenced the accused to two years and six months’ imprisonment backdated to date of arrest.
12	PP v Lim Ah Seng: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing Factors in Domestic Abuse Case 06 Jul 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	06 Jul 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe accused was convicted of a lesser charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
13	Public Prosecutor v Wan Chin Hon: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Deliberately Driving Motorcyclist Off Road 05 Jul 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Jul 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to four years’ imprisonment and disqualified from driving all classes of motor vehicles for life.
14	Mustaza Bin Abdul Majid v Public Prosecutor: Theft from Supermarket & Dishonest Intention 03 Feb 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Feb 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction upheldThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction.
15	Ong Ah Tiong v Public Prosecutor: Trade Mark Infringement & Sentencing Appeal 26 Jan 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	26 Jan 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
16	B Subramaniam v PP: Harbouring Illegal Immigrant at Checkpoint - Immigration Act 20 Oct 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	20 Oct 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossAppeal against conviction dismissed, but sentence reduced. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Vignes s/o Mourthi v PP: Court of Appeal's Jurisdiction on Re-Trial Application After Appeal Dismissal 12 Oct 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 Oct 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. No monetary amount is applicable.
18	Wong Tiew Yong v PP: Auxiliary Police Officers' Conduct & Sentencing Appeal 27 Aug 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Aug 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossThe Public Prosecutor partially lost the appeal as the sentence was reduced to a fine.
19	Tuen Huan Rui Mary v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust & Sentencing Appeal 16 Jul 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	16 Jul 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, but the appeal against sentence was allowed.
20	Jin Yugang v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Upheld Despite Intoxication Defence 16 May 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 May 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's case for murder was upheld; the appeal was dismissed.
21	Chen Weixiong Jerriek v PP: Appeal Against Sentence for Robbery and Voluntarily Causing Hurt 29 Apr 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Apr 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Dismissed; Sentences EnhancedAppeal dismissed and sentences enhanced.
22	Public Prosecutor v Anthony Ler & Z: Abetment to Murder & Murder under Penal Code 04 Dec 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Dec 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAnthony Ler was found guilty of abetment to murder and sentenced to death. Z was found guilty of murder and sentenced to be detained during the President's pleasure.
23	PP v Rajagopalan Tamilarasan: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Oct 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Oct 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionBoth accused were convicted and sentenced to death.
24	Public Prosecutor v Yeo Kang Oh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Aug 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Aug 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused convicted and sentenced to death.
25	Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Noor bin Abdullah: Trafficking of Diamorphine 04 Jun 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Jun 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty as charged.
26	Saeng-Un Udom v Public Prosecutor: Attempted Murder Conviction After Disputed Forensic Evidence 11 May 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	11 May 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): LostMurder conviction overturned; appellant convicted of a lesser charge.
27	Saeng-Un Udom v PP: Murder Charge Reduced to Attempted Murder Due to Forensic Evidence 11 May 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	11 May 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossMurder conviction overturned; appellant convicted of attempted murder (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	PP v Vincent Lee: Kidnapping for Ransom of Schoolgirl - Life Imprisonment Sentence 03 May 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)	03 May 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): -
29	PP v Zhou Jian Guang: Kidnapping for Ransom - Sentencing of Accomplices 26 Apr 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Apr 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Life imprisonment for both accusedThe accused were sentenced to life imprisonment.
30	PP v Syed Yasser Arafat: Trafficking Diamorphine at Lentor Avenue & Yishun Avenue 1 18 Apr 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Apr 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and convicted.