Tan Chin Heng v Public Prosecutor: Impersonating a Police Officer & Criminal Force
Tan Chin Heng appealed to the High Court of Singapore against his conviction and sentence for impersonating a police officer and using criminal force against a woman in a hotel room. The High Court, Choo Han Teck J, dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial judge's findings and the imposed sentences.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Tan Chin Heng was convicted of impersonating a police officer and using criminal force. The High Court dismissed his appeal against conviction and sentence.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Respondent | Government Agency | Appeal dismissed | Won | Edwin San of Deputy Public Prosecutor |
Tan Chin Heng | Appellant | Individual | Appeal dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | J | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Edwin San | Deputy Public Prosecutor |
Peter Ong Lip Cheng | Peter Ong & Raymond Tan |
4. Facts
- The appellant impersonated a police officer.
- The appellant requested sexual services from the complainant.
- The appellant bound the complainant's hands with plastic cable bonds.
- The appellant had sexual intercourse with the complainant.
- The complainant reported the incident to the police after being arrested in a raid.
5. Formal Citations
- Tan Chin Heng v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate's Appeal No 310 of 2010, [2011] SGHC 7
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Offences committed in a hotel room in Geylang. | |
Magistrate's Appeal No 310 of 2010 | |
High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence. |
7. Legal Issues
- Impersonating a Police Officer
- Outcome: The court upheld the conviction for impersonating a police officer.
- Category: Substantive
- Use of Criminal Force
- Outcome: The court upheld the conviction for using criminal force.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Appeal against conviction
- Appeal against sentence
9. Cause of Actions
- Impersonation of a Public Servant
- Criminal Force
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Law
- Appeals
11. Industries
- Hospitality
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Impersonating a police officer
- Criminal force
- Oral testimony
- Findings of fact
- Appeal against conviction
- Appeal against sentence
15.2 Keywords
- Impersonation
- Criminal Force
- Appeal
- Conviction
- Sentence
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Criminal Law | 90 |
Penal Code | 90 |
Criminal Procedure | 70 |
Sentencing | 60 |
Evidence | 50 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Evidence
- Sentencing