Erik Widjaja

Erik Widjaja is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international commercial arbitration and arbitration. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Erik Widjaja has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Erik Widjaja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Erik Widjaja has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	BZW v BZV: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice in Shipbuilding Dispute(Jan 2022) BZV v BZW: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Apr 2021) China Merchants Bank v Sinfeng Marine: Pre-Action Discovery & Validity of Bunkers Contract(Oct 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Erik Widjaja's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Erik Widjaja's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,000.00	4,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BZW v BZV: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice in Shipbuilding Dispute 11 Jan 2022 BZX (Appellant)Lost	11 Jan 2022	BZX (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the High Court's decision to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.
2	BZV v BZW: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 04 Apr 2021 BZX (Defendant)Lost	04 Apr 2021	BZX (Defendant): Claim DismissedApplication allowed and the award set aside in so far as it dismisses the plaintiff's claim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	China Merchants Bank v Sinfeng Marine: Pre-Action Discovery & Validity of Bunkers Contract 03 Oct 2019 China Merchants Bank Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	03 Oct 2019	China Merchants Bank Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs of $4,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).