Ernest Wee

Ernest Wee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and assessment of damages. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ernest Wee has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forbearance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Inheritance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fatal Accidents Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ernest Wee has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Michael Hwang	3 cases	50% of cases	OCBC v Infocommcentre: Overdraft Facility Recall & Misrepresentation in Compromise Agreements(Jul 2005) Masters v To: Fatal Accident, Dependency Claim, Loss of Inheritance & Support(Jan 2005) Masters v To Keng Lam: Appeal of Damages Assessment, Admissibility of Further Evidence(Aug 2003)
Michael Hwang SC	2 cases	33% of cases	Lassiter v To: Appeal on Damages Assessment & Admissibility of Evidence(Mar 2004) PT Tugu Pratama Indonesia v Magma Nusantara Ltd: Arbitration Agreement & Tribunal Jurisdiction Dispute(Sep 2003)
Michael Hwang Chambers	1 cases	17% of cases	PT Prima v Kempinski: Illegality, Force Majeure & New Management Contract in Hotel Management Dispute(Jul 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ernest Wee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ernest Wee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	34,668,133.72	8,667,033.434 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PT Prima v Kempinski: Illegality, Force Majeure & New Management Contract in Hotel Management Dispute 08 Jul 2012 PT Prima International Development (Appellant, Respondent)Won	08 Jul 2012	PT Prima International Development (Appellant, Respondent): Appeals allowedPrima's appeals in CA 94, 95 and 96 are allowed, and Kempinski’s cross-appeal in CA 98 is dismissed. Prima is awarded costs of these appeals and the proceedings below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	OCBC v Infocommcentre: Overdraft Facility Recall & Misrepresentation in Compromise Agreements 28 Jul 2005 Infocommcentre Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	28 Jul 2005	Infocommcentre Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of $34,668,133.72 with interest thereon as at 12 April 2004. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Masters v To: Fatal Accident, Dependency Claim, Loss of Inheritance & Support 09 Jan 2005 Lassiter Ann Masters (suing as the widow and dependant of Lassiter Henry Adolphus, deceased) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	09 Jan 2005	Lassiter Ann Masters (suing as the widow and dependant of Lassiter Henry Adolphus, deceased) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; multiplier for loss of support varied from eight years to ten years. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
4	Lassiter v To: Appeal on Damages Assessment & Admissibility of Evidence 25 Mar 2004 Lassiter Ann Masters (Appellant)Lost	25 Mar 2004	Lassiter Ann Masters (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with two-thirds costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	PT Tugu Pratama Indonesia v Magma Nusantara Ltd: Arbitration Agreement & Tribunal Jurisdiction Dispute 09 Sep 2003 Magma Nusantara Ltd (Respondent)Won	09 Sep 2003	Magma Nusantara Ltd (Respondent): Costs awardedThe applicant shall pay the respondent its costs of these proceedings.
6	Masters v To Keng Lam: Appeal of Damages Assessment, Admissibility of Further Evidence 19 Aug 2003 Lassiter Ann Masters (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Aug 2003	Lassiter Ann Masters (Plaintiff): Applications dismissedApplications to adduce further evidence were dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.