Eugene Tan

Eugene Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misrepresentation and building and construction contracts. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eugene Tan has demonstrated expertise across 63 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	13 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	10 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Termination	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Acceptance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attendance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and bonds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sand Ban	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ready-Mixed Concrete	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Loss	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Industry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Detention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Sum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hire	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Election or Affirmation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eugene Tan has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	6 cases	40% of cases	Lim Chin San Contractors v Shiok Kim Seng: Proprietary Estoppel & Remedies(May 2012) Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Discovery of Documents Dispute over Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(Nov 2010) Hong Kiat Construction v Ngiam Benjamin: Appeal on Arbitrator Appointment in Construction Dispute(Jul 2009)
RHTLaw Asia LLP	4 cases	27% of cases	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy(Jan 2022) Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance & Termination(Jun 2021) CIE v CIF: Setting Aside Portions of Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract(Jan 2021)
Drew and Napier LLC	3 cases	20% of cases	CS Bored Pile System v Evan Lim: Formation of Contract & Acceptance in Construction Subcontract(Jan 2006) Jurong Town Corp v Wishing Star Ltd: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Construction Project(May 2005) Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Misrepresentation, Contract Breach & Damages(Nov 2004)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	7% of cases	Liew Kai Lung Karl v Ching Chiat Kwong: Setting Aside Statutory Demand in Bankruptcy Proceedings(Apr 2015)
Lee & Lee	1 cases	7% of cases	Hiap Tian Soon v Hola Development: Equitable Set-Off, Performance Bonds & Construction Delays(Oct 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eugene Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 2 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.4 parties avg	2.4	47%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eugene Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(47%)	47%
Partial	2(13%)	13%
Won	6(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	927,112.38	103,012.499 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy 27 Jan 2022 Uday Mehra (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jan 2022	Uday Mehra (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedAll claims made by the plaintiff were dismissed.
2	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance & Termination 13 Jun 2021 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	13 Jun 2021	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	CIE v CIF: Setting Aside Portions of Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract 25 Jan 2021 CIE (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jan 2021	CIE (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Claimant's application to set aside portions of the arbitration award was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Pleadings, Rules of Court, Witness Attendance 15 Jul 2020 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant)Lost	15 Jul 2020	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant): Application deniedDefendant's arguments against providing further particulars and bifurcating the trial were rejected. Costs to be assessed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Liew Kai Lung Karl v Ching Chiat Kwong: Setting Aside Statutory Demand in Bankruptcy Proceedings 29 Apr 2015 Ching Chiat Kwong (Respondent)Won	29 Apr 2015	Ching Chiat Kwong (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision of the assistant registrar was dismissed and the plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant costs (inclusive of disbursements) fixed at $2,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lim Chin San Contractors v Shiok Kim Seng: Proprietary Estoppel & Remedies 14 May 2012 Shiok Kim Seng (trading as IKO Precision Toolings) (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	14 May 2012	Shiok Kim Seng (trading as IKO Precision Toolings) (Defendant, Appellant): Cross appeal dismissed; appeal partially allowedCross appeal dismissed; appeal partially allowed. Awarded $188,817.98 for the cost of installing the mezzanine floor and $46,205.40 for the loss of opportunity to purchase the premises, plus $3,000 in legal costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Discovery of Documents Dispute over Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply 14 Nov 2010 Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	14 Nov 2010	Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Application for Discovery GrantedDefendant's application for discovery of documents was granted; costs of $1,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Hong Kiat Construction v Ngiam Benjamin: Appeal on Arbitrator Appointment in Construction Dispute 06 Jul 2009 Hong Kiat Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	06 Jul 2009	Hong Kiat Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appointment of arbitrator allowedPlaintiff's application to appoint Mr. Johnny Tan as arbitrator was allowed. Costs to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff fixed at $4,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Cheng Song Chuan v Chin Ivan: Project Management Contract Dispute over Payment and Repudiation 18 Mar 2008 Cheng Song Chuan (trading as Trade Sources Enterprise) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	18 Mar 2008	Cheng Song Chuan (trading as Trade Sources Enterprise) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffFinal judgment awarded to the plaintiff for the sum of $201,978 with interest and costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Erect Scaffolding Pte Ltd v Hor Kew Pte Ltd: Damages for Conversion and Lost Scaffolding 23 Sep 2007 Hor Kew Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	23 Sep 2007	Hor Kew Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; required to pay damages for conversion ($331,500) and lost items ($148,111) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Amendment of Pleadings and Mitigation of Loss 17 May 2006 Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	17 May 2006	Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs reserved.
12	CS Bored Pile System v Evan Lim: Formation of Contract & Acceptance in Construction Subcontract 19 Jan 2006 Evan Lim & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2006	Evan Lim & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant with damages to be assessed. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
13	Jurong Town Corp v Wishing Star Ltd: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Construction Project 12 May 2005 Wishing Star Ltd (Respondent)Lost	12 May 2005	Wishing Star Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; contract validly terminated; ordered to pay damages to JTC (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Misrepresentation, Contract Breach & Damages 21 Nov 2004 Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Nov 2004	Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found that the defendant was not induced into the contract by any of the representations that had been found to be untrue, and further, that in the event, the defendant had, by its conduct, elected to affirm the contract after it had full notice of the facts and its rights in law.
15	Hiap Tian Soon v Hola Development: Equitable Set-Off, Performance Bonds & Construction Delays 30 Oct 2002 Hola Development Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	30 Oct 2002	Hola Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimInterlocutory judgment awarded to the defendant on their counterclaim for the first plaintiffs' failure to rectify the defective works and for the delay in the works. The amount will be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.