Eugene Thuraisingam

Eugene Thuraisingam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 75 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 19.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 16% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated expertise across 194 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	36 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 36 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	29 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 29 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	24 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 24 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	19 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	15 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 15 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	14 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	13 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	10 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	9 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	9 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	7 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Right to Counsel	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Advisory	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Transaction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconsumed Leave	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Protection from Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stimulant-Related Disorder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cumulative Scald Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fundamental liberties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Case Management Stay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consequences of Prosecution’s non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Factual Possession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention to Possess	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Animus Possidendi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freedom of assembly	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Charges	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecution by Attrition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutionality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Identification Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Courier	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt in the face of the court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Due Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witness gating	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Eyewitness testimony	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Elements of crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal statutes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unilateral mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Retraction of Plea	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mitigation Plea	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reopening of concluded criminal appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Standard of Proof for Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Dissipation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appropriate sanction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intimidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Acts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Powers of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Consent Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Non-Disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Importation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Principal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegal importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
False statements of fact	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Knowledge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Disability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expense Claims	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freedom of Religion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Coroners Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inquiries	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Takeover Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cash Back Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
False Claim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Aesthetic Clinic	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Schizophrenia	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Assistance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privacy Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Validity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gang Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hospitality Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Complicity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accomplice Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Eugene Thuraisingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eugene Thuraisingam has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 45 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	45 cases	60% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Salihin bin Ismail: Murder Conviction for Child Abuse Resulting in Death(Jun 2024) TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Guarantee, Performance Bond & Striking Out Defences(Jan 2024) Public Prosecutor v Liang Shoon Yee: Trafficking of Methamphetamine(Sep 2023)
Stamford Law Corporation	9 cases	12% of cases	Quek Hock Lye v PP: Criminal Conspiracy, Drug Trafficking & Constitutional Rights(Apr 2012) Dinesh Pillai v PP: Importation of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Statutory Presumption(Apr 2012) Hendricks v Shangri-La: Hotel Liability for Lost Ring & Innkeepers Act(Oct 2011)
Eugene Thuraisingam	8 cases	11% of cases	Quek Hock Lye v PP: Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act Amendment on Death Penalty(Jan 2015) PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Drugs, Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2015) Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng: Defamation, Freedom of Speech, and Criminal Misappropriation Allegations(Nov 2014)
Allen and Gledhill	5 cases	7% of cases	Chin Bay Ching v Merchant Ventures: Defamation, Interlocutory Injunctions & Freedom of Speech(May 2005) Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products: Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal(Mar 2005) Dayco Products v Ong: Director's Fiduciary Duty & Disclosure of Interest(Sep 2004)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	4 cases	5% of cases	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: Abetting False Claim, Cash Back Scheme, Lawyer's Knowledge(May 2009) Ang Ai Tin v Chua Keng Hwee: Breach of Oral Agreements & Settlement Agreement Dispute(Apr 2009) George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George: Testamentary Capacity of Schizophrenic Testator(Apr 2009)
Allen & Gledhill	3 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Norezam bin Mohsin: Sentencing Parity in Culpable Homicide Case(Oct 2007) PP v Lew Syn Pau: Financial Assistance for Share Acquisition & Corporate Veil(Aug 2006) Kotjo v Ng Wei Teck: Striking Out Claim for Unused Leave in Judicial Management(Aug 2001)
Eugene Thuraisignam LLP	1 cases	1% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Adri Anton Kalangie: Importation of Methamphetamine(Aug 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eugene Thuraisingam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 12 (16%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	522.7 parties avg	2.7	69%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	1%
Partial	82.6 parties avg	2.6	11%
Won	144.0 parties avg	4.0	19%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2007	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2009	52.8 parties avg	2.8
2010	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2011	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2012	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	123.1 parties avg	3.1
2016	62.2 parties avg	2.2
2017	64.6 parties avg	4.6
2018	52.6 parties avg	2.6
2019	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2020	62.7 parties avg	2.7
2022	52.8 parties avg	2.8
2023	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eugene Thuraisingam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	52(69%)	69%
Neutral	1(1%)	1%
Partial	8(11%)	11%
Won	14(19%)	19%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,889,605.71	75,584.2325 cases	25
USD	128,472,871.62	32,118,217.914 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2005	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2012	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2015	12 633	Lost: 6 cases (50.0%) Partial: 3 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (25.0%)
2016	6 42	Lost: 4 cases (66.7%) Partial: 2 cases (33.3%)
2017	6 42	Lost: 4 cases (66.7%) Won: 2 cases (33.3%)
2018	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2019	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	6 6	Lost: 6 cases (100.0%)
2022	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2023	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 75 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Salihin bin Ismail: Murder Conviction for Child Abuse Resulting in Death 30 Jun 2024 Muhammad Salihin bin Ismail (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	30 Jun 2024	Muhammad Salihin bin Ismail (Respondent, Appellant): Convicted of MurderSalihin was convicted of murder under section 300(c) of the Penal Code.
2	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Guarantee, Performance Bond & Striking Out Defences 30 Jan 2024 UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	30 Jan 2024	UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of AR Chong dismissed; judgment entered against the first defendant for US$63.3m with interest and costs.
3	Public Prosecutor v Liang Shoon Yee: Trafficking of Methamphetamine 17 Sep 2023 Liang Shoon Yee (Defendant)Lost	17 Sep 2023	Liang Shoon Yee (Defendant): ConvictionThe accused was found guilty of trafficking 269.1 grams of methamphetamine.
4	PP v Mohamed Mubin: Misuse of Drugs Act & Abnormality of Mind 16 Mar 2023 Mohamed Mubin bin Abdul Rahman (Accused)Lost	16 Mar 2023	Mohamed Mubin bin Abdul Rahman (Accused): Unsuccessful in seeking alternative sentencing under s 33B(3)(b) of the MDAThe court determined that s 33B(3)(b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act was not satisfied.
5	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Striking Out Defenses in Guarantee Claim 29 Jan 2023 UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Jan 2023	UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant): Defenses Struck OutDefendant's defenses were struck out, and judgment was entered against them for USD 63,303,806.66 (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies the amount in USD).
6	Public Prosecutor v Miya Manik: Complicity, Common Intention, and Murder Sentencing 10 Nov 2022 Miya Manik (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	10 Nov 2022	Miya Manik (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedManik's appeal against the sentence on the Substituted s 326 Charge was dismissed.
7	PP v Azlin & Ridzuan: Murder Sentencing Appeal for Child Scalding Case 17 Oct 2022 Ridzuan Bin Mega Abdul Rahman (Respondent)Lost	17 Oct 2022	Ridzuan Bin Mega Abdul Rahman (Respondent): Life ImprisonmentRidzuan's sentence was adjusted to life imprisonment. The sentence of caning was removed.
8	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor: Statutory Interpretation and Public Order Act 27 Sep 2022 Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Appellant)Lost	27 Sep 2022	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
9	Attorney-General v Ravi s/o Madasamy: Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Misconduct 27 Jul 2022 Ravi s/o Madasamy (Defendant)Won	27 Jul 2022	Ravi s/o Madasamy (Defendant): Charge Not Made OutThe court agreed with the Disciplinary Tribunal that the first charge against Ravi s/o Madasamy was not made out.
10	UD Trading Group v TA Private Capital: Leave to Appeal Stay of Proceedings 02 Feb 2022 UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	02 Feb 2022	UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to appeal dismissed; UDTG to pay costs of SGD 8,000 to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Public Order Act s 16(1)(a) and Freedom of Assembly 05 Nov 2020 Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Applicant)Lost	05 Nov 2020	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Applicant): Reference DismissedThe criminal reference was dismissed, upholding the applicant's conviction under s 16(1)(a) of the Public Order Act.
12	PP v Wong Chee Meng: Corruption, PCA, Public Servant, Town Council Contracts 15 Jul 2020 Chia Sin Lan (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	15 Jul 2020	Chia Sin Lan (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Dismissed, Sentence EnhancedChia's appeal was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced.
13	Ong Ming Johnson v Attorney-General: Challenge to Section 377A Fails 29 Mar 2020 Ong Ming Johnson (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Mar 2020	Ong Ming Johnson (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to declare s 377A unconstitutional was dismissed.
14	Mohammad Farid v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking Diamorphine & Courier Status under Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Mar 2020 Mohammad Farid bin Batra (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	25 Mar 2020	Mohammad Farid bin Batra (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal against conviction dismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed; mandatory death penalty stands.
15	Public Prosecutor v Boh Soon Ho: Murder, Provocation, and Diminished Responsibility 18 Mar 2020 Boh Soon Ho (Defendant)Lost	18 Mar 2020	Boh Soon Ho (Defendant): Imprisonment for LifeAccused was sentenced to imprisonment for life after being convicted of murder.
16	The Online Citizen Pte Ltd v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods 18 Feb 2020 The Online Citizen Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	18 Feb 2020	The Online Citizen Pte Ltd (Appellant): Application dismissedThe Online Citizen Pte Ltd's application to set aside the Part 3 Correction Direction was dismissed.
17	PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking, Fresh Evidence, PTSD & Impact on Statements 04 Jul 2019 Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Defendant)Neutral	04 Jul 2019	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Defendant): Findings made on the terms of reference remitted by the Court of Appeal.The court made findings on the terms of reference remitted by the Court of Appeal.
18	Zamri bin Mohd Tahir v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Application of Courier Exception under Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Feb 2019 Zamri bin Mohd Tahir (Appellant)Lost	10 Feb 2019	Zamri bin Mohd Tahir (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
19	PP v Muhammad Faizal: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Jan 2019 Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2019	Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff (Defendant): ConvictionThe Defendant was convicted of the charge.
20	Law Society v Wong Sin Yee: Disciplinary Proceedings for Improper Cross-Examination 06 Sep 2018 WONG SIN YEE (Respondent)Lost	06 Sep 2018	WONG SIN YEE (Respondent): SuspensionRespondent suspended for five years and ordered to pay costs of $5,000 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Rohini Balasubramaniam v HSR International Realtors: Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Property Transactions 04 Jul 2018 HSR International Realtors Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	04 Jul 2018	HSR International Realtors Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against HSR; HSR found liable for negligence and ordered to pay 30% of the amount claimed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Broadley Construction v Alacran Design: Contract Dispute over Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Unilateral Mistake 15 May 2018 Broadley Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	15 May 2018	Broadley Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Broadley is entitled to costs here and below.
23	Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Concluded Criminal Appeals and Abuse of Process 14 Mar 2018 Hishamrudin bin Mohd (Applicant)Lost	14 Mar 2018	Hishamrudin bin Mohd (Applicant): Criminal motion dismissedThe applicant's criminal motion to reopen the concluded criminal appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
24	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Misuse of Drugs Act & Statutory Interpretation 04 Mar 2018 Selamat bin Paki (Appellant)Lost	04 Mar 2018	Selamat bin Paki (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
25	BMI v BMJ: Appeal Against Matrimonial Consent Order Dismissed Due to Lack of Fraudulent Non-Disclosure 08 Nov 2017 BMI (Applicant, Appellant, Petitioner)Lost	08 Nov 2017	BMI (Applicant, Appellant, Petitioner): Appeal dismissedThe wife's appeal to set aside the matrimonial consent order was dismissed.
26	Public Prosecutor v Adri Anton Kalangie: Importation of Methamphetamine 29 Aug 2017 Adri Anton Kalangie (Defendant)Lost	29 Aug 2017	Adri Anton Kalangie (Defendant): Sentence of 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the caneThe accused was sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
27	Alacran Design v Broadley Construction: Misrepresentation & Mistake in Construction Contract 09 Jul 2017 Broadley Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	09 Jul 2017	Broadley Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; Broadley remains liable to pay Alacran the Outstanding Sum of $423,407.34. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Rohini v Yeow & HSR: Vicarious Liability for Agent's Fraudulent Misappropriation 27 Jun 2017 HSR International Realtors Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 Jun 2017	HSR International Realtors Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was entered in favour of the defendant, HSR International Realtors Pte Ltd, dismissing the plaintiff's claim. No order as to costs was made as the plaintiff had been granted legal aid. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	BMI v BMJ: Setting Aside Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets Due to Alleged Fraudulent Non-Disclosure 21 May 2017 BMI (Petitioner)Lost	21 May 2017	BMI (Petitioner): Application DismissedWife's application to set aside the Consent Order was dismissed with costs of $15,000 awarded to the Husband (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Attorney-General v Ting Choon Meng: Harassment & False Statements under Protection from Harassment Act 15 Jan 2017 LEE SONG KWANG (Respondent, Appellant)Won	15 Jan 2017	LEE SONG KWANG (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed.The appeal was allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Masoud Rahimi v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Trafficking 29 Dec 2016 Mogan Raj Terapadisamy (Appellant)Lost	29 Dec 2016	Mogan Raj Terapadisamy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
32	Phosagro Asia v Piattchanine: Termination of Employment Contract for Serious Misconduct 27 Oct 2016 IOURI PIATTCHANINE (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	27 Oct 2016	IOURI PIATTCHANINE (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partThe court affirmed the lower court's decision regarding the reimbursement of personal claims.
33	Law Society v Ravi Madasamy: Disciplinary Proceedings for Non-Practicing Solicitor's Misconduct 26 Oct 2016 Ravi s/o Madasamy (Respondent)Lost	26 Oct 2016	Ravi s/o Madasamy (Respondent): Prohibited from applying for a practicing certificateThe Respondent is prohibited from applying for a practicing certificate for a period of two years (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
34	TDT v TDS: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance Post-Divorce 25 May 2016 TDT (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	25 May 2016	TDT (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partPartial refund of interim maintenance paid to Q in the amount of $40,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
35	Public Prosecutor v Shanmuga Nathan Balakrishnan: Illegally Importing Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 15 May 2016 Shanmuga Nathan Balakrishnan (Defendant)Lost	15 May 2016	Shanmuga Nathan Balakrishnan (Defendant): ConvictionThe accused was convicted under s 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act for illegally importing not less than 67.49g of diamorphine into Singapore.
36	Chan Siew Lee Jannie v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group: Bankruptcy & Statutory Demands 05 Apr 2016 Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Appellant)Lost	05 Apr 2016	Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $20,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent.
37	Ting Choon Meng v Attorney-General: Protection from Harassment Act & False Statements 08 Dec 2015 LEE KWAI HOU HOWARD (Appellant)Won	08 Dec 2015	LEE KWAI HOU HOWARD (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the decision of the District Judge was allowed.
38	Prabagaran v PP: Importation of Diamorphine & Rebuttal of Statutory Presumptions under the Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Nov 2015 PRABAGARAN A/L SRIVIJAYAN (Appellant)Lost	29 Nov 2015	PRABAGARAN A/L SRIVIJAYAN (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
39	Piattchanine v Phosagro Asia: Wrongful Termination & Expense Claims Dispute 08 Oct 2015 IOURI PIATTCHANINE (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Oct 2015	IOURI PIATTCHANINE (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partPlaintiff was awarded S$649,200 pursuant to the Defendant’s termination of the Employment Contract without notice and S$33,998.37 for the outstanding annual bonus due to him for his first and completed year of employment.
40	Vijaya Kumar v Attorney-General: Challenge to Music Ban During Thaipusam Procession Based on Religious Freedom and Equality 16 Sep 2015 SATHIYAMOORTHY S/O MURUGIAH (Applicant)Lost	16 Sep 2015	SATHIYAMOORTHY S/O MURUGIAH (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to apply for a Quashing Order and a Mandatory Order was dismissed. The court ordered the three applicants to be jointly and severally liable to pay the respondent costs fixed by me at $6,000 and disbursements amounting to $1,923.80 for this application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
41	TDS v TDT: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Short Marriage 30 Aug 2015 TDT (Defendant)Partial	30 Aug 2015	TDT (Defendant): PartialHusband to pay 30% of shares in companies to wife. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
42	Chan Siew Lee v TYC Investment: Shareholder Reserve Powers & Director Deadlock 12 Aug 2015 Chan Siew Lee (Appellant, Second Respondent)Partial	12 Aug 2015	Chan Siew Lee (Appellant, Second Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe scope of the reserve powers in this case does not extend to the matters set out at [81]–[86] above.
43	Timor Global v Equatorial Group: Breach of Contract for Coffee Beans 03 Aug 2015 Timor Global, LDA (Plaintiff)Won	03 Aug 2015	Timor Global, LDA (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,270,369.59, being the balance contract price of coffee beans sold and delivered.
44	Public Prosecutor v Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking - Rebuttal of Presumption 28 Jun 2015 Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Respondent)Lost	28 Jun 2015	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Respondent): ConvictedThe Court of Appeal convicted the Respondent on the charge preferred against him.
45	Chan Siew Lee Jannie v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd: Setting Aside Statutory Demand 14 Jun 2015 Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jun 2015	Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Plaintiff): Applications dismissedPlaintiff's applications to extend time and set aside the Statutory Demand were dismissed with costs of $3000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
46	Law Society v Ravi Madasamy: Misconduct Investigation of Non-Practicing Solicitor 28 Apr 2015 Ravi s/o Madasamy (Respondent)Lost	28 Apr 2015	Ravi s/o Madasamy (Respondent): Application for Leave GrantedLaw Society's application for leave to appoint a Disciplinary Tribunal was granted.
47	Quek Hock Lye v PP: Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act Amendment on Death Penalty 28 Jan 2015 Quek Hock Lye (Applicant)Lost	28 Jan 2015	Quek Hock Lye (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application to set aside the death sentence was dismissed.
48	PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Drugs, Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Jan 2015 Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Defendant)Won	07 Jan 2015	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Defendant): AcquittedIlechukwu was acquitted of trafficking not less than 1,963.3g of methamphetamine.
49	Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng: Defamation, Freedom of Speech, and Criminal Misappropriation Allegations 06 Nov 2014 ROY NGERNG YI LING (Defendant)Lost	06 Nov 2014	ROY NGERNG YI LING (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantInterlocutory judgment granted to the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
50	TYC Investment v Tay Yun Chwan: Shareholder Powers & Director Duties in Payment Disputes 09 Oct 2014 Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Defendant)Lost	09 Oct 2014	Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Defendant): Required to pay costsRequired to pay TYC $20,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
51	James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel & Criminal Procedure Code Interpretation 27 May 2014 James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant)Lost	27 May 2014	James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant): Motion DismissedThe criminal motion filed by the Applicant was dismissed.
52	James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel Upon Arrest & Access to Counsel 13 Jan 2014 James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant)Lost	13 Jan 2014	James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's motion for a declaration of an immediate right to counsel and an order for immediate access to counsel was dismissed.
53	Selvi v Attorney-General: Coroner's Inquiry & Death in Custody 31 Oct 2013 Selvi d/o Narayanasamy (Applicant)Lost	31 Oct 2013	Selvi d/o Narayanasamy (Applicant): Application for leave dismissedApplication for leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed; applicant ordered to pay costs of $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
54	Dinesh Pillai v PP: Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumption of Knowledge in Drug Importation 28 Aug 2012 Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam (Applicant)Lost	28 Aug 2012	Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application to set aside his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
55	Quek Hock Lye v PP: Criminal Conspiracy, Drug Trafficking & Constitutional Rights 08 Apr 2012 Quek Hock Lye (Appellant)Lost	08 Apr 2012	Quek Hock Lye (Appellant): Appeal DismissedQuek's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
56	Dinesh Pillai v PP: Importation of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Statutory Presumption 03 Apr 2012 Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam (Appellant)Lost	03 Apr 2012	Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for importing diamorphine was dismissed.
57	Hendricks v Shangri-La: Hotel Liability for Lost Ring & Innkeepers Act 24 Oct 2011 Bass Anne Hendricks (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Oct 2011	Bass Anne Hendricks (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
58	Communication Design International Ltd v Swarovski Management Pte Ltd: Breach of Oral Agreement Dispute 28 Apr 2011 Communication Design International Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Apr 2011	Communication Design International Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedCDI's claim for breach of oral agreement was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
59	Subramaniam v Pandiyan: Rescission of Settlement Agreement Based on Misrepresentation Claim 27 Apr 2011 Pandiyan John (Defendant, Appellant)Won	27 Apr 2011	Pandiyan John (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the decision to not strike out the statement of claim was allowed.
60	Kwek Seow Hock v PP: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Defence of Consumption 06 Apr 2011 Kwek Seow Hock (Appellant)Lost	06 Apr 2011	Kwek Seow Hock (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
61	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp v Asia Pacific Links: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Takeover Code 11 Oct 2010 Soh Guan Cheow Anthony (Defendant)Lost	11 Oct 2010	Soh Guan Cheow Anthony (Defendant): Claim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
62	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: Interpretation of Section 209 of the Penal Code and Solicitor's Role in Filing False Claims 19 Jan 2010 Bachoo Mohan Singh (Appellant)Won	19 Jan 2010	Bachoo Mohan Singh (Appellant): Motion GrantedCriminal Motion No. 44 of 2009 granted.
63	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: False Claim, Solicitor's Duty, and Penal Code Interpretation 03 Dec 2009 Bachoo Mohan Singh (Appellant, Applicant, Respondent)Partial	03 Dec 2009	Bachoo Mohan Singh (Appellant, Applicant, Respondent): Extension of time granted to apply to the High Court Judge for leave to raise questions to the Court of AppealExtension of time granted to apply to the High Court Judge for leave to raise questions to the Court of Appeal.
64	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: Abetting False Claim, Cash Back Scheme, Lawyer's Knowledge 24 May 2009 Bachoo Mohan Singh (Appellant)Lost	24 May 2009	Bachoo Mohan Singh (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.
65	Ang Ai Tin v Chua Keng Hwee: Breach of Oral Agreements & Settlement Agreement Dispute 06 Apr 2009 Ang Ai Tin (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Apr 2009	Ang Ai Tin (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partPlaintiff's claim in respect of the two oral agreements is dismissed, but her claim in respect of the settlement agreement for $668,000.00 is allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
66	George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George: Testamentary Capacity of Schizophrenic Testator 02 Apr 2009 Jacob George (Respondent)Lost	02 Apr 2009	Jacob George (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
67	Ong Jane Rebecca v Pricewaterhousecoopers: Security for Costs & Access to Courts 05 Feb 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	05 Feb 2009	PricewaterhouseCoopers (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedCross-appeal dismissed; security for costs reduced on plaintiff's appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
68	Public Prosecutor v Norezam bin Mohsin: Sentencing Parity in Culpable Homicide Case 16 Oct 2007 Mohamed Hishamadi Bin Rahmat (Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2007	Mohamed Hishamadi Bin Rahmat (Defendant): Imprisonment and CaningSentenced to seven years imprisonment and six strokes of the cane.
69	PP v Lew Syn Pau: Financial Assistance for Share Acquisition & Corporate Veil 10 Aug 2006 Wong Sheung Sze (Defendant)Won	10 Aug 2006	Wong Sheung Sze (Defendant): AcquittedAcquitted of the charge of knowingly and wilfully authorizing the company to indirectly give financial assistance.
70	Chin Bay Ching v Merchant Ventures: Defamation, Interlocutory Injunctions & Freedom of Speech 16 May 2005 Chin Bay Ching (Appellant)Won	16 May 2005	Chin Bay Ching (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed with costs. Security for costs to be refunded to the appellant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
71	Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products: Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal 15 Mar 2005 Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	15 Mar 2005	Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Costs awardedCosts of $3,000 awarded against the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
72	Dayco Products v Ong: Director's Fiduciary Duty & Disclosure of Interest 01 Sep 2004 Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	01 Sep 2004	Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for the PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the total sum of US$598,695.37 together with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the Writ of Summons until judgment.
73	Rukiah bte Ismail v Public Prosecutor: Cheating Banks for Renovation Loans 11 May 2004 Rukiah bte Ismail (Appellant)Lost	11 May 2004	Rukiah bte Ismail (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.
74	Velstra Pte Ltd v Dexia Bank: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Bankruptcy Act 12 Feb 2004 Dexia Bank NV (formerly known as Artesia Banking Corp NV) (Defendant)Won	12 Feb 2004	Dexia Bank NV (formerly known as Artesia Banking Corp NV) (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's claim, which was dismissed with costs.
75	Kotjo v Ng Wei Teck: Striking Out Claim for Unused Leave in Judicial Management 16 Aug 2001 Others (Respondent)Won	16 Aug 2001	Others (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe respondents successfully defended the appeal.