Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim

Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in automobile accidents and personal injury. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
B Rao & K S Rajah	3 cases	75% of cases	Loh Chia Mei v Koh Kok Han: Personal Injury, Negligence, & Damages Assessment(Aug 2009) Tan Siew Bin Ronnie v Chin Wee Keong: Negligence Claim for Whiplash Injury & Damages Assessment(Oct 2007) Ricky Charles v Chua Boon Yeow: Transfer of Proceedings from District Court to High Court(Dec 2002)
B Rao and K S Rajah	1 cases	25% of cases	Ting Heng Mee v Sin Sheng Fresh Fruit: Assessment of Damages for Traffic Accident Injuries(Feb 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Fazal Mohamed Bin Abdul Karim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	124,730.38	31,182.604 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Loh Chia Mei v Koh Kok Han: Personal Injury, Negligence, & Damages Assessment 10 Aug 2009 Koh Kok Han (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	10 Aug 2009	Koh Kok Han (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partCosts of this appeal, fixed at $7,500, were to be paid to the defendant by the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tan Siew Bin Ronnie v Chin Wee Keong: Negligence Claim for Whiplash Injury & Damages Assessment 07 Oct 2007 Chin Wee Keong (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	07 Oct 2007	Chin Wee Keong (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ting Heng Mee v Sin Sheng Fresh Fruit: Assessment of Damages for Traffic Accident Injuries 25 Feb 2004 Sin Sheng Fresh Fruit Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Feb 2004	Sin Sheng Fresh Fruit Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for 90% liability with damages to be assessed and costs plus disbursements to be reserved to the registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Ricky Charles v Chua Boon Yeow: Transfer of Proceedings from District Court to High Court 01 Dec 2002 Chua Boon Yeow (Respondent)Won	01 Dec 2002	Chua Boon Yeow (Respondent): Appeal WonAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).