Loh Chia Mei v Koh Kok Han: Personal Injury, Negligence, & Damages Assessment

In Loh Chia Mei v Koh Kok Han, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by Koh Kok Han against the Assistant Registrar's assessment of damages awarded to Loh Chia Mei for injuries sustained in a motorcycle accident. The primary legal issue was the assessment of damages for loss of future earnings. The court varied the award for loss of earnings from $581,940 to $518,940, finding the initial assessment excessive, and ordered Loh Chia Mei to pay the defendant's costs for the appeal.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal allowed in part.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding damages assessment for Loh Chia Mei's injuries from a motorcycle accident caused by Koh Kok Han. The court adjusted the loss of earnings award.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Loh Chia MeiPlaintiff, RespondentIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial
Koh Kok HanDefendant, AppellantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Judith PrakashJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff was injured in a motorcycle accident on 2 July 2006 while riding pillion on the defendant’s motorcycle.
  2. The plaintiff sustained serious injuries, including fractures to her left femur, left patella, right elbow, and coccyx.
  3. The plaintiff underwent multiple surgeries to treat her fractures.
  4. Prior to the accident, the plaintiff worked as a senior car sales executive.
  5. The plaintiff was terminated from her employment due to her long absence from work after the accident.
  6. The plaintiff found employment as an administrative assistant after the accident for a lower salary.
  7. Medical experts provided conflicting opinions on the plaintiff's ability to return to her previous employment.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Loh Chia Mei v Koh Kok Han, Suit 564/2007, RA 38/2009, [2009] SGHC 181

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiff injured in a motorcycle accident.
Plaintiff admitted to Changi General Hospital.
Plaintiff underwent surgery.
Plaintiff underwent further surgery.
Plaintiff discharged from hospital.
Plaintiff admitted for bone grafting surgery.
Plaintiff discharged from hospital.
Dr. WC Chang examined the plaintiff.
Plaintiff found employment as an administrative assistant.
Interlocutory judgment entered against the defendant by consent.
Surveillance of the plaintiff was conducted.
Ms. Vicki Pang assessed the plaintiff.
Plaintiff's long medical leave ended.
Surveillance of the plaintiff was conducted.
Dr. Krishnamoorthy saw the plaintiff.
Matter came before the AR for damages to be assessed.
Decision date.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Assessment of Damages
    • Outcome: The court varied the award for loss of earnings.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Loss of Future Earnings
    • Outcome: The court reduced the award for loss of future earnings from $581,940 to $518,940.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Mitigation of Losses
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff had acted reasonably in seeking employment as an administrative assistant and had sufficiently mitigated her losses.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages for personal injury
  2. Loss of earnings
  3. Future medical expenses

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Litigation

11. Industries

  • Automotive

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Smith v Manchester CorpN/AYes[1974] 17 KIR 1N/ACited for the distinction between loss of future earnings and loss of future earning capacity.
Chang Ah Lek v Lim Ah KoonSingapore Court of AppealYes[1999] 1 SLR 82SingaporeCited for accepting the dictum in Smith v Manchester Corp on the distinction between loss of future earnings and loss of future earning capacity.
Teo Sing Keng v Sim Bian KiatCourt of AppealYes[1994] 1 SLR 634SingaporeCited for guidelines on when an award for loss of earning capacity is more appropriate than an award for loss of future earnings.
Teo Seng Kiat v Goh Hwa TeckN/ANo[2003] 1 SLR 333N/ACited as a case where a similar multiplier was adopted for a plaintiff of similar age.
Suriaty Bte Mohamed Sabit & Anor v Ng Soon SaiHigh CourtNo[1996] SGHC 187SingaporeCited as a case where a similar multiplier was adopted for a plaintiff of similar age.
Delgro Corp Ltd & Anor v Chia Siew KiongN/ANo[1999] 4 SLR 745N/ACited as a case where the court commented that a multiplier of 12 for a plaintiff aged 36 was ‘quite conservative’.
Fu Yik Min v Khoo Kim ThongDistrict CourtNo[2004] SGDC 110SingaporeCited as a case where the district court judge applied a multiplier of 14 in a case involving a 28 year old plaintiff.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Loss of future earnings
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Mitigation of losses
  • Multiplier
  • Multiplicand
  • Personal injury
  • Negligence
  • Assessment of damages

15.2 Keywords

  • personal injury
  • negligence
  • damages
  • loss of earnings
  • motorcycle accident
  • Singapore
  • High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Personal Injury
  • Negligence
  • Damages
  • Civil Procedure