Foo Xian Yao

Foo Xian Yao is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in jurisdiction and admission of advocates and solicitors. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Admission of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Xian Yao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Foo Xian Yao has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Foo Xian Yao's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Foo Xian Yao's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice 16 Sep 2013 TT International Ltd (Respondent)Lost	16 Sep 2013	TT International Ltd (Respondent): Application AllowedTT International Ltd opposed the application, which was ultimately allowed.