Francis Ng

Francis Ng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 45 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 71.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 2% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Francis Ng has demonstrated expertise across 85 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	39 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 39 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	30 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 30 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	23 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 23 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	16 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 16 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	12 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Health Products Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Double Jeopardy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Violence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Attempted culpable homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Regime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reopening of concluded criminal appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Courts and Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prostitution Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Optometry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Furnishing False Information	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bias and Prejudice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Counterfeit Currency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Traffic Offence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gang Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Re-trial	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Miscarriage of Justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fabricating false evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Delinquency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Food, Drug and Cosmetics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prison Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Motor accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Francis Ng has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 33 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	33 cases	73% of cases	Attorney-General v Wham Kwok Han Jolovan: Contempt of Court Sentencing(Apr 2019) Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Criminal Appeal & Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2018) Muhammad bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act Trafficking(Jan 2017)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	5 cases	11% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Amir bin Jubir: Trafficking of Diamorphine(May 2008) Public Prosecutor v Chan Soi Peng: Culpable Homicide Sentencing After 10 Years at Large(Oct 2007) Public Prosecutor v Kwong Kok Hing: Sentencing for Attempted Culpable Homicide with Hurt(May 2007)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	5 cases	11% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Norezam bin Mohsin: Sentencing Parity in Culpable Homicide Case(Oct 2007) Public Prosecutor v Teo Chwee Kow: Culpable Homicide Sentencing(Sep 2007) PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death(Jul 2005)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of cases	PP v K S: Statutory Rape & Outraging Modesty of Step-Daughter(Jan 2003)
DPP	1 cases	2% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Bala Kuppusamy: Sexual Assault, Robbery, and Penal Code Amendments(Apr 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Francis Ng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 1 (2%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	71.9 parties avg	1.9	16%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	2%
Partial	52.2 parties avg	2.2	11%
Won	322.3 parties avg	2.3	71%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2003	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2008	41.8 parties avg	1.8
2009	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	72.1 parties avg	2.1
2015	62.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Francis Ng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(16%)	16%
Neutral	1(2%)	2%
Partial	5(11%)	11%
Won	32(71%)	71%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,811.82	1,635.306 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2003	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2008	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2009	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	7 214	Lost: 2 cases (28.6%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 4 cases (57.1%)
2015	6 15	Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 5 cases (83.3%)
2016	5 14	Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 45 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Attorney-General v Wham Kwok Han Jolovan: Contempt of Court Sentencing 28 Apr 2019 The Attorney-General (Applicant)Partial	28 Apr 2019	The Attorney-General (Applicant): Costs awardedCosts of SGD 5,000 plus disbursements of SGD 2,297.82 awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Criminal Appeal & Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's criminal motion.
3	Muhammad bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act Trafficking 11 Jan 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Jan 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed; mandatory death sentences upheld.
4	Obioha v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution and Setting Aside Death Sentence for Drug Trafficking 16 Nov 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Nov 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for stay of execution and setting aside death sentence was dismissed.
5	Kho Jabing v Attorney-General: Abuse of Process, Res Judicata, and Constitutional Law 19 May 2016 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	19 May 2016	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent successfully defended the appeal.
6	Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor: Reopening Concluded Appeals and Natural Justice in Sentencing 18 May 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 May 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe respondent successfully defended against the applicant's motion to set aside the sentence of death.
7	Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor: Reopening Concluded Criminal Appeals and Finality of Judgments 04 Apr 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 Apr 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the Prosecution's appeal and maintained the death sentence.
8	Koh Bak Kiang v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Conviction for Drug Trafficking 25 Feb 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	25 Feb 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial Revision GrantedThe Public Prosecutor agreed to the revision of the convictions on the Disputed Charges and the substitution with reduced charges.
9	Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General: Scandalising the Court & Freedom of Speech 29 Nov 2015 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2015	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the Attorney-General. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	PP v Koh Peng Kiat: Trade Marks Act Defences & Health Products Act Strict Liability 23 Nov 2015 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Neutral	23 Nov 2015	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Legal principles clarifiedThe Public Prosecutor sought clarification on three questions of law. The court provided guidance on these issues.
11	Muhammad Ridzuan v AG: Judicial Review of PP's Decision on Substantive Assistance Certificate under Misuse of Drugs Act 04 Oct 2015 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	04 Oct 2015	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Attorney-General successfully defended the appeal against the High Court's decision.
12	Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General: Application for Prohibiting Order and Declarations Regarding Caning 07 Jul 2015 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	07 Jul 2015	Attorney-General (Defendant): Summons 1788 grantedApplication to strike out the OS was granted. Ms Netto was ordered to personally pay the AG’s disbursements of both the summonses fixed at $1,514 and the AG’s costs of Summons 1788 fixed at $1,000.
13	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Caning under Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Mar 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Mar 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
14	Quek Hock Lye v PP: Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act Amendment on Death Penalty 28 Jan 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Jan 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the application to set aside the death sentence.
15	Lim Ghim Peow v PP: Culpable Homicide & Diminished Responsibility Sentencing 16 Oct 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Oct 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentence AffirmedThe Public Prosecutor's original sentence of 20 years' imprisonment was affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
16	Poh Boon Kiat v PP: Online Vice Ring, Women's Charter & Sentencing Principles 24 Sep 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	24 Sep 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossThe Public Prosecutor's original sentencing request was partially overturned.
17	Muhammad Ridzuan v AG: Judicial Review of PP's Decision on Substantive Assistance under MDA 11 Sep 2014 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	11 Sep 2014	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed. No order as to costs was made. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Public Prosecutor v Koh Peng Kiat: Appeal Against Conviction for Trade Mark and Health Products Act Violations 04 Sep 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	04 Sep 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against sentence was dismissed as the convictions for the fourteen charges do not stand.
19	Cheong Chun Yin v Attorney-General: Application for Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Substantive Assistance 26 Jun 2014 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2014	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed.
20	Muhammad Ridzuan v PP: Trafficking, Common Intention, Misuse of Drugs Act. Appeal Dismissed. 27 May 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 May 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the High Court's decision to convict the appellant on drug charges.
21	Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court & Court of Appeal Jurisdiction 29 Apr 2014 Attorney-General (Applicant)Lost	29 Apr 2014	Attorney-General (Applicant): Application DismissedThe Attorney-General's application for leave to commence committal proceedings against Au Wai Pang was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Wu Guo Hao Max v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Furnishing False Information 21 Nov 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Nov 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Wu Guo Hao Max was dismissed.
23	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Noor Indra: Revision of Sentence under Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Aug 2009 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Lost	17 Aug 2009	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Application DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's application for revision of the sentence was dismissed.
24	Varatharajah Rajaselvan v PP: Appeal Out of Time for Counterfeit Currency Conviction 26 Apr 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	26 Apr 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe applicant's criminal motion was dismissed.
25	Public Prosecutor v Bala Kuppusamy: Sexual Assault, Robbery, and Penal Code Amendments 20 Apr 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Apr 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 42 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
26	Gao Hua v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Plea of Guilt Due to Counsel Pressure 19 Apr 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	19 Apr 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe High Court allowed the applicant's appeal, setting aside the conviction and remitting the case back to the District Court for a retrial.
27	Lim Hong Eng v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Dangerous Driving Conviction and Sentence 16 Apr 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	16 Apr 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successful.The Public Prosecutor's case was partially successful as the conviction for dangerous driving was upheld, but the sentence was reduced.
28	Attorney-General v Bank: Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters - Production of Bank Records 22 Oct 2008 Attorney-General (Appellant)Won	22 Oct 2008	Attorney-General (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Attorney-General's appeal was allowed, and the production order against the bank was granted.
29	Chan Yok Tuang v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Intimidation Appeal 19 Aug 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	19 Aug 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed and the conviction was set aside.
30	Re Section 22 of the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act: Application for Bank Production Order 23 Jun 2008 Attorney-General (Applicant)Lost	23 Jun 2008	Attorney-General (Applicant): Application dismissedThe Attorney-General's application for a production order was dismissed due to the failure to exhibit the request from the foreign country.
31	Public Prosecutor v Amir bin Jubir: Trafficking of Diamorphine 28 May 2008 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 May 2008	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Public Prosecutor won the case, securing a conviction against Amir bin Jubir.
32	Public Prosecutor v Chan Soi Peng: Culpable Homicide Sentencing After 10 Years at Large 23 Oct 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	23 Oct 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe accused was convicted of culpable homicide, but the sentence sought by the prosecution was not fully granted.
33	Public Prosecutor v Norezam bin Mohsin: Sentencing Parity in Culpable Homicide Case 16 Oct 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	16 Oct 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentences imposedSentences of imprisonment and caning were imposed on all six accused.
34	Public Prosecutor v Teo Chwee Kow: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 26 Sep 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Sep 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence imposedAccused sentenced to nine years imprisonment.
35	Public Prosecutor v Kwong Kok Hing: Sentencing for Attempted Culpable Homicide with Hurt 29 May 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 May 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Accused sentenced to one year's imprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to one year's imprisonment.
36	PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death 14 Jul 2005 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	14 Jul 2005	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the respondents were convicted of murder.
37	Vignes s/o Mourthi v Public Prosecutor: Application for Retrial and Stay of Execution in Death Sentence Case 17 Sep 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	17 Sep 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for retrial and stay of execution was dismissed.
38	Rahman Pachan Pillai Prasana v PP: Fabricating False Evidence & Sentencing Principles 10 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal.
39	PP v K S: Statutory Rape & Outraging Modesty of Step-Daughter 22 Jan 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	22 Jan 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction on four chargesThe accused was convicted on charges A1, A2, A3, and A5.
40	Public Prosecutor v Arun Prakash Vaithilingam: Murder, Sudden Fight Exception 09 Dec 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	09 Dec 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
41	PP v Wanari bin Kamri: Step-Daughter Rape Case 25 Sep 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Sep 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): GuiltyAccused was convicted of three charges of rape.
42	Tan Cheng Kwee v Public Prosecutor: Road Traffic Act, Strict Liability, and Sentencing Appeal 29 May 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 May 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal against conviction was dismissed.
43	PP v Peh Thian Hui: Aggravated Rape, Child Molestation, and Abetment - Sentencing 23 May 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 May 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentences imposedSentences imposed on both accused persons.
44	PP v Tubbs: Negligence, Road Accidents, and Standard of Care for Drivers 05 Aug 2001 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	05 Aug 2001	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe prosecution's appeal against the acquittal was dismissed.
45	Cheng Thomas v PP: Appeal Against Reformative Training for Unruly Behavior at Boys' Home 29 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence of reformative training.