Gabriel Choong

Gabriel Choong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gabriel Choong has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Remote Gambling Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction of statute	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Utilities Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gabriel Choong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gabriel Choong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	100% of cases	Khoo Moy Seen v Public Prosecutor: Remote Gambling Act Sentencing Framework(May 2022) Nurun Novi Saydur Rahman v Public Prosecutor: Workplace Safety & Health Act Violation Resulting in Fatalities(Nov 2018) PP v Ravan: Misuse of Drugs Act Sentencing for Cannabis Trafficking(Apr 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gabriel Choong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gabriel Choong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Khoo Moy Seen v Public Prosecutor: Remote Gambling Act Sentencing Framework 22 May 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 May 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant.
2	Nurun Novi Saydur Rahman v Public Prosecutor: Workplace Safety & Health Act Violation Resulting in Fatalities 01 Nov 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	01 Nov 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Cross-appeal allowedCross-appeal against sentence allowed; sentence enhanced to 25 weeks' imprisonment.
3	PP v Ravan: Misuse of Drugs Act Sentencing for Cannabis Trafficking 25 Apr 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Apr 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentences imposedSentences of imprisonment and caning were imposed on all three accused persons.
4	Soil Investigation Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Liability for Damage to Water Main under Public Utilities Act 18 Apr 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	18 Apr 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the conviction of the Appellant was overturned.
5	Public Prosecutor v Aw Tai Hock: Dangerous Driving, Road Traffic Act, Sentencing Principles 05 Oct 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	05 Oct 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal allowedThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondent's imprisonment term was enhanced.