Gan Hiang Chye

Gan Hiang Chye is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and strata title law. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	7 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stamp Duty	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Land Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Transactions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Titles Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Title	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Hiang Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gan Hiang Chye has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	4 cases	50% of cases	Ngui Gek Lian Philomene v Chan Kiat: Collective Sale Dispute over Good Faith and Incentive Payments(Sep 2013) Cheok Doris v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Refund Dispute Over Aborted Property Transaction(Aug 2010) Yickvi Realty v Pacific Rover: Easement Dispute over Road Realignment(Sep 2009)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	Lim Hun Joo v Kok Yin Chong: Collective Sale of Goodluck Garden - Land Titles (Strata) Act(Nov 2018)
KhattarWong	1 cases	13% of cases	Cheok Doris v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Refund on Rescinded Property Sale(Jan 2010)
Khattar Wong	1 cases	13% of cases	TSM Development v Pereira: Adverse Possession & Land Title Extinguishment(Sep 2005)
Khattar Wong and Partners	1 cases	13% of cases	TSM Development v Pereira: Adverse Possession Claim under Land Titles Act(Feb 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gan Hiang Chye's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Won	310.1 parties avg	10.1	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	25.8 parties avg	5.8
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	116.0 parties avg	16.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gan Hiang Chye's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Hun Joo v Kok Yin Chong: Collective Sale of Goodluck Garden - Land Titles (Strata) Act 25 Nov 2018 Chan Keng Siang Gregory (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2018	Chan Keng Siang Gregory (Plaintiff): Application GrantedOrder granted for the collective sale of the property.
2	Ngui Gek Lian Philomene v Chan Kiat: Collective Sale Dispute over Good Faith and Incentive Payments 02 Sep 2013 HSR International Realtors Pte Ltd (Intervener)Neutral	02 Sep 2013	HSR International Realtors Pte Ltd (Intervener): NeutralThe intervener's role was to provide information and arguments to the court.
3	Cheok Doris v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Refund Dispute Over Aborted Property Transaction 10 Aug 2010 Cheok Doris (Appellant)Lost	10 Aug 2010	Cheok Doris (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the High Court dismissing the appeal of the appellant against the decision of the Commissioner of Stamp Duties was dismissed.
4	Cheok Doris v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Refund on Rescinded Property Sale 14 Jan 2010 Cheok Doris (Appellant)Lost	14 Jan 2010	Cheok Doris (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant failed to prove vendor's inability to transfer good title.
5	Yickvi Realty v Pacific Rover: Easement Dispute over Road Realignment 17 Sep 2009 Yickvi Realty Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	17 Sep 2009	Yickvi Realty Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Yickvi was not entitled to an injunction to restrain Pacific Rover from realigning the road. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Lim Choo Suan Elizabeth v Goh Kok Hwa Richard: Collective Sale Approval Appeal 11 May 2009 Lee Choon Kum Beatrice (Respondent)Won	11 May 2009	Lee Choon Kum Beatrice (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the Strata Titles Board approving the collective sale of the development was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	TSM Development v Pereira: Adverse Possession & Land Title Extinguishment 12 Sep 2005 Leonard Stephanie Celine nee Pereira (Respondent)Lost	12 Sep 2005	Leonard Stephanie Celine nee Pereira (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the respondent's claim of adverse possession was rejected.
8	TSM Development v Pereira: Adverse Possession Claim under Land Titles Act 28 Feb 2005 Leonard Stephanie Celine nee Pereira (Defendant, Respondent)Won	28 Feb 2005	Leonard Stephanie Celine nee Pereira (Defendant, Respondent): Cross-application grantedThe defendant's cross-application for a declaration that she had been in continuous adverse possession of the land in dispute was granted.