Gerald Kuppusamy

Gerald Kuppusamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in strata titles and guarantee. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated expertise across 49 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake of Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Laches	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ultra vires	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money had and received	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Management Corporation Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Colore Officii	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gerald Kuppusamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gerald Kuppusamy has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	5 cases	56% of cases	Astrata v Portcullis: Escrow Agreement Dispute over AGI's Chapter 11 Reorganisation(Apr 2011) Littau v Astrata: Discovery of Electronically Stored Documents & Keyword Search in Anton Piller Order Execution(Mar 2011) Citibank NA v Robert: Forum Non Conveniens & Guaranty Enforcement(Jan 2011)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	22% of cases	Management Corporation v De Beers: Recovery of Payments & Strata Title Act(Mar 2002) Tan Cheong Leong v Lim Chun Chuan: Trust, Joint Accounts & Directors' Duties(Sep 2001)
Drew & Napier	2 cases	22% of cases	Management Corporation v De Beers: Recovery of Unlawful Payments for Condo Conversion(Jul 2001) MCST No 473 v De Beers: Recovery of Payments & Maintenance Obligations(Jul 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gerald Kuppusamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.1
Complex Cases: 1 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Neutral	216.9 parties avg	16.9	22%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	22%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	315.2 parties avg	15.2
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	32.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gerald Kuppusamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(11%)	11%
Neutral	2(22%)	22%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,110,000.00	222,000.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Astrata v Portcullis: Escrow Agreement Dispute over AGI's Chapter 11 Reorganisation 28 Apr 2011 Astrata (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	28 Apr 2011	Astrata (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal allowed in partApplication for leave to appeal granted and declared that Tridex is not entitled to delivery of the Escrow Property; appeals dismissed.
2	Littau v Astrata: Discovery of Electronically Stored Documents & Keyword Search in Anton Piller Order Execution 17 Mar 2011 Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	17 Mar 2011	Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Directions made for discoveryDirections made for keyword searches to be conducted on seized electronic documents to identify discoverable information.
3	Citibank NA v Robert: Forum Non Conveniens & Guaranty Enforcement 23 Jan 2011 Citibank NA (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	23 Jan 2011	Citibank NA (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal to stay the suit was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Littau v Astrata: Interim Injunction & Non-Compete Agreement Dispute 09 Dec 2010 Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	09 Dec 2010	Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Orders granted to the defendant were ordered to stand, except for the part of paragraph 2 that allowed the defendant to use the information and documents disclosed or produced pursuant to the search orders for purposes of any claim against the plaintiff as well as the Tridex Companies in and outside Singapore.Orders granted to the defendant were ordered to stand, except for the part of paragraph 2 that allowed the defendant to use the information and documents disclosed or produced pursuant to the search orders for purposes of any claim against the plaintiff as well as the Tridex Companies in and outside Singapore. The court ordered costs at 90% to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, the deduction of 10% being the costs attributed to the arguments on the Riddick principle. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Astrata v Tridex: Escrow Agreement Dispute & Performance Bond Call - Singapore High Court 25 Aug 2010 Astrata (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	25 Aug 2010	Astrata (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant): Interlocutory Injunction Application DeniedThe court declined to grant the Interlocutory Injunction.
6	Management Corporation v De Beers: Recovery of Payments & Strata Title Act 05 Mar 2002 De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	05 Mar 2002	De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd (Respondent): Counterclaim AllowedDe Beers' counterclaim for $370,000 was allowed, with interest awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Tan Cheong Leong v Lim Chun Chuan: Trust, Joint Accounts & Directors' Duties 23 Sep 2001 Tan Toh Chin (Defendant)Neutral	23 Sep 2001	Tan Toh Chin (Defendant): Application by the 15th, 16th and 17th defendants to amend their Statement of Claim was dismissed.Application by the 15th, 16th and 17th defendants to amend their Statement of Claim was dismissed.
8	Management Corporation v De Beers: Recovery of Unlawful Payments for Condo Conversion 30 Jul 2001 De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2001	De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd (Defendant): WonJudgment for Defendant on Counterclaim. The plaintiffs shall repay the defendants the sum of $370,000 with interest at the rates and for the periods stated in 103 above. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	MCST No 473 v De Beers: Recovery of Payments & Maintenance Obligations 30 Jul 2001 De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2001	De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd (Defendant): WonThe plaintiffs shall repay the defendants the sum of $370,000 with interest at the rates and for the periods stated in [para ]103 above. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).