Geraldine Kang

Geraldine Kang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Geraldine Kang has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Illegal importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Traffic Death Cases	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Geraldine Kang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Geraldine Kang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	67% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mervin Singh: Trafficking Diamorphine Case(Oct 2011) Abdul Salam v PP: Conspiracy to Traffic Drugs - Conviction & Sentence Appeal(Nov 2010) Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2010)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	2 cases	33% of cases	PP v Ng Jui Chuan: Negligence vs Rashness in Fatal Traffic Accident - Penal Code s 304A(Apr 2011) Public Prosecutor v Dinesh Pillai: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Geraldine Kang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Geraldine Kang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Mervin Singh: Trafficking Diamorphine Case 04 Oct 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Oct 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedBoth accused were found guilty as charged.
2	PP v Ng Jui Chuan: Negligence vs Rashness in Fatal Traffic Accident - Penal Code s 304A 10 Apr 2011 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	10 Apr 2011	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the amendment of charges and sentences was dismissed.
3	Abdul Salam v PP: Conspiracy to Traffic Drugs - Conviction & Sentence Appeal 07 Nov 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	07 Nov 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulAppeal against conviction allowed in part; sentence reduced.
4	Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Sep 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Sep 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted and sentenced to death.
5	Public Prosecutor v Dinesh Pillai: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Apr 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Apr 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty as charged.
6	PP v ACI: Attempted Culpable Homicide & Grievous Hurt - Sentencing 28 Oct 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Oct 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to five years' imprisonment.