Goh Kim Thong Andrew

Goh Kim Thong Andrew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in director's duties and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Right to Inspect Accounts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Kim Thong Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Goh Kim Thong Andrew has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
De Souza Lim & Goh LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, and Misrepresentation in US$10M Loan Agreement(Dec 2021) Normet Singapore v Koh Wee Xiong: Wrongful Dismissal, Breach of Contract & Employee Compensation Dispute(Nov 2021)
Fortis Law Corporation	2 cases	33% of cases	Wang Cheng v Song Fanrong: Contempt of Court for Mareva Order Breach(Apr 2018) Wong Lee Vui v Li Qingyun: Derivative Action, Minority Shareholder Rights & Directors' Duties(Nov 2015)
Andrew Goh Chambers	2 cases	33% of cases	Lee Kim Song v Chan Chee Kien: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute(Jan 2021) Cheng Tim Jin v Alvamar Capital: De Facto Director's Right to Inspect Company Accounts(Sep 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh Kim Thong Andrew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.0 parties avg	4.0	83%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	33.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh Kim Thong Andrew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4
USD	700,000.00	700,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, and Misrepresentation in US$10M Loan Agreement 16 Dec 2021 AKS Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Dec 2021	AKS Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the second, third, and fourth defendants for a total of US$700,000.
2	Normet Singapore v Koh Wee Xiong: Wrongful Dismissal, Breach of Contract & Employee Compensation Dispute 22 Nov 2021 Normet Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant)Lost	22 Nov 2021	Normet Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedNormet's appeal against the Judge’s rejection of one of the alleged breaches of Koh’s employment contract, ie, that Koh had breached his duty of confidentiality owed to Normet by procuring a laboratory known as TUV SUD PSB Pte Ltd (“TUV”) to issue supplementary test reports on Normet’s products to Kensetsu. Normet also appealed against the Judge’s findings that Koh was entitled to his pro-rated AWS and compensation for five days of unused compassionate leave was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lee Kim Song v Chan Chee Kien: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute 19 Jan 2021 Lee Kim Song (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jan 2021	Lee Kim Song (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for the return of funds loaned, or alternatively, beneficial ownership in the various properties as a result of either a resulting trust or a common intention constructive trust was dismissed.
4	Cheng Tim Jin v Alvamar Capital: De Facto Director's Right to Inspect Company Accounts 18 Sep 2019 Cheng Tim Jin (Plaintiff)Won	18 Sep 2019	Cheng Tim Jin (Plaintiff): Application grantedThe plaintiff's application for a declaration that he is a de facto director and for an order to inspect the defendant's accounts was granted. Costs of $7,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Wang Cheng v Song Fanrong: Contempt of Court for Mareva Order Breach 26 Apr 2018 Teo Kuei Yang (Defendant)Lost	26 Apr 2018	Teo Kuei Yang (Defendant): Found in Contempt of CourtThe second defendant was sentenced to two weeks’ jail for contempt of court.
6	Wong Lee Vui v Li Qingyun: Derivative Action, Minority Shareholder Rights & Directors' Duties 11 Nov 2015 Wong Lee Vui @ Willie Wong Lee Vui (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Nov 2015	Wong Lee Vui @ Willie Wong Lee Vui (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for leave to commence a derivative action was dismissed; Plaintiff to pay costs to the 1st Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).