Grace Lim

Grace Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and prevention of corruption act. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 27% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Grace Lim has demonstrated expertise across 46 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	10 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Complicity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sanctions Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Epileptic Seizures	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences against public servants	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
United Nations Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Match-fixing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sports Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Grace Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Grace Lim has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	11 cases	100% of cases	Teo Chu Ha v Public Prosecutor: Corruption & CDSA Offences in Seagate Tender Case(May 2023) Muhammad Feroz Khan v Public Prosecutor: Bail Application for Accused with Epilepsy(Nov 2022) PP v Sindok Trading & Ors: UN Sanctions Breach & DPRK Luxury Goods Supply(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Grace Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 3 (27%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	43.8 parties avg	3.8	36%
Won	72.7 parties avg	2.7	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Grace Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	4(36%)	36%
Won	7(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,500.00	1,625.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Teo Chu Ha v Public Prosecutor: Corruption & CDSA Offences in Seagate Tender Case 08 May 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant)Partial	08 May 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against sentence partially allowed; sentences adjusted.
2	Muhammad Feroz Khan v Public Prosecutor: Bail Application for Accused with Epilepsy 13 Nov 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Nov 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for bail was dismissed.
3	PP v Sindok Trading & Ors: UN Sanctions Breach & DPRK Luxury Goods Supply 13 Mar 2022 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Won	13 Mar 2022	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeals against the sentences imposed on Chong Hock Yen and the three corporate entities were allowed.
4	Kreetharan v Public Prosecutor: Conspiracy to Cheat & Criminal Procedure 20 Sep 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	20 Sep 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the applications to overturn the convictions.
5	Tan Gek Young v Public Prosecutor: Illicit Sale of Codeine Cough Preparations 16 Aug 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	16 Aug 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against sentence dismissed in part; individual sentences varied, aggregate sentence remains. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Koh Yong Chiah v Public Prosecutor: False Information to Public Servant & Sentencing Guidelines 17 Nov 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	17 Nov 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the four weeks’ imprisonment term was dismissed.
7	PP v Syed Mostofa Romel: Corruption in Marine Surveying & Prevention of Corruption Act 27 Apr 2015 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	27 Apr 2015	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced.
8	Ding Si Yang v Public Prosecutor: Bail Pending Appeal for Corruption Charges 01 Feb 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Feb 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion dismissedThe Respondent successfully opposed the Applicant's motion for bail pending appeal.
9	Ding Si Yang v PP: Match-Fixing, Corruption, and Sentencing in Football 15 Jan 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	15 Jan 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Cross-appeal allowedThe prosecution's cross-appeal against the sentence was allowed.
10	PP v Marzuki bin Ahmad: Corruption, Prevention of Corruption Act, Penalty for Accepting Gratification 26 Aug 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	26 Aug 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the aggregate sentence of eight months’ imprisonment was dismissed, but its appeal against the District Judge’s decision not to order a penalty under s 13(2) was allowed. The Accused was ordered to pay a sum of $6,500 as a penalty under s 13(2). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Seah Hock Thiam v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Perversion of Justice for Parking Offences 18 Jul 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	18 Jul 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence partially overturnedAppeal against conviction upheld. Appeal against sentence partially overturned, with the imprisonment term reduced from six weeks to one week (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).