Han Ming Kuang

Han Ming Kuang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 37 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 76.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated expertise across 71 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	32 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 32 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	27 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 27 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	16 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	12 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Complicity	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Order	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment by conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unsoundness of Mind	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common Gaming Houses Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Delay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rehabilitation of Offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Premature Application	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment by Aiding	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abortion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Work Permits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Ming Kuang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Han Ming Kuang has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 17 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	17 cases	46% of cases	PP v Dan: Culpable Homicide, Child Abuse & Evidence Disposal - Sentencing for Fatal Child Abuse(Sep 2024) Mohamed Aliff v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal for Infant Death(Sep 2023) PP v Mohamed Aliff: Murder Conviction for Infant's Death Due to Blunt Force Trauma(Nov 2022)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	9 cases	24% of cases	Yap Keng Ho v PP: Revision of Proceedings & Witness Presence During Trial(Nov 2006) Abul Khabir Uddin Tohron Nisa v Public Prosecutor: Bail Reduction Application under Employment of Foreign Workers Act(Mar 2006) Khor Kok Soon v PP: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure(Nov 2005)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	9 cases	24% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Raub bin Saat: Bankruptcy Act & Intent to Defraud in Property Purchase(Oct 2010) Sankar Jayakumar v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving and Grievous Hurt(Jul 2010) Fernandez Joseph Ferdinent v Public Prosecutor: Road Traffic Offences - Failure to Stop, Render Assistance, and Remove Vehicle(Apr 2007)
Public Prosecutor	2 cases	5% of cases	Mohd Sharif v PP: Trafficking Diamorphine - Knowledge & Presumption under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2002) Public Prosecutor v Yeo Kang Oh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Han Ming Kuang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Partial	52.4 parties avg	2.4	14%
Won	282.1 parties avg	2.1	76%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	52.2 parties avg	2.2
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Han Ming Kuang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(11%)	11%
Partial	5(14%)	14%
Won	28(76%)	76%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	50,000.00	5,555.569 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2005	5 14	Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 37 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Dan: Culpable Homicide, Child Abuse & Evidence Disposal - Sentencing for Fatal Child Abuse 30 Sep 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Sep 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 34 and a half years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane, with an additional six months’ imprisonment in lieu of caning.
2	Mohamed Aliff v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal for Infant Death 10 Sep 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Sep 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment AffirmedThe Court affirmed the decision of the trial judge and dismissed the appeal against conviction.
3	PP v Mohamed Aliff: Murder Conviction for Infant's Death Due to Blunt Force Trauma 23 Nov 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Nov 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of murder.
4	Public Prosecutor v CNJ: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide by Young Offender 23 Jan 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Jan 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence of five years’ detention imposedThe accused was sentenced to five years’ detention.
5	Public Prosecutor v Teo Ghim Heng: Murder, Diminished Responsibility, and Provocation 21 Jan 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Jan 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on both charges.
6	Public Prosecutor v CAD: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offender 03 Nov 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Nov 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment.
7	PP v Holman Benjamin John: Voluntarily Causing Hurt at MRT Station 01 Nov 2018 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	01 Nov 2018	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against sentence allowed; original sentence of four weeks' imprisonment substituted with two months' imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Public Prosecutor v Tan Zhenyang: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt in Parking Dispute 27 Sep 2018 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	27 Sep 2018	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the original fine was replaced with a 5-week imprisonment sentence (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	PP v Ranjit Singh Gill: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	05 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Partial VictoryOne defendant received the death penalty, while the other received life imprisonment.
10	Public Prosecutor v Zaini bin Mohamed Noor: Illegally Importing Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Jul 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Jul 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Prosecution proved the charge against Zaini beyond a reasonable doubt.
11	Public Prosecutor v Lee Kun En: Moneylending Act & Penal Code Violations 08 Feb 2012 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	08 Feb 2012	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was increased.
12	Public Prosecutor v Ellarry bin Puling: Joint Charge of Murder and Common Intention 25 Sep 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	25 Sep 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Partial VictoryOne defendant was found guilty of murder, while the other was convicted of robbery with hurt.
13	Tang Hai Liang v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Application of Statutory Presumptions 01 Aug 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Aug 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence for trafficking in diamorphine was dismissed.
14	Chee Soon Juan v PP: Freedom of Speech & Public Entertainment Licence 19 Jan 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Jan 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; original conviction and sentence upheld. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Public Prosecutor v Raub bin Saat: Bankruptcy Act & Intent to Defraud in Property Purchase 03 Oct 2010 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	03 Oct 2010	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was dismissed.
16	Sankar Jayakumar v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving and Grievous Hurt 01 Jul 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Jul 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldConviction for dangerous driving and causing grievous hurt was upheld, although the sentence was reduced.
17	Chan Kum Hong Randy v Public Prosecutor: Mitigating Effect of Delay in Criminal Prosecution 03 Feb 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	03 Feb 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; original sentence overturned.
18	PP v Fernandez: Road Traffic Act - Failure to Stop & Removing Vehicle from Accident Scene 16 Jul 2007 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Won	16 Jul 2007	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Reference answered in the affirmativeThe Court of Appeal answered both questions in the affirmative.
19	Fernandez Joseph Ferdinent v Public Prosecutor: Road Traffic Offences - Failure to Stop, Render Assistance, and Remove Vehicle 29 Apr 2007 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	29 Apr 2007	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulThe Public Prosecutor's position was partially upheld as the appeal was dismissed in part.
20	Yap Keng Ho v PP: Revision of Proceedings & Witness Presence During Trial 07 Nov 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe respondent successfully defended against the applicant's criminal motion for a mistrial.
21	Abul Khabir Uddin Tohron Nisa v Public Prosecutor: Bail Reduction Application under Employment of Foreign Workers Act 30 Mar 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	30 Mar 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Bail ReducedBail reduced from $100,000 to $50,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Khor Kok Soon v PP: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure 10 Nov 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Nov 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldConviction upheld. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
23	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky v PP: Abetment, Cheating & Amendment of Charges 13 Oct 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Oct 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction upheldConviction upheld after amendment of charge to abetment by intentional aiding.
24	S Balakrishnan v PP: Abetment, Negligence & Sentencing in SAF Training Death 16 Aug 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Aug 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeals against conviction and sentence were dismissed, and the sentences were enhanced.
25	Moganaruban v PP: Criminal Conspiracy, Defrauding Court & Insurance Companies 15 Aug 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Aug 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Dismissed, Sentences EnhancedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal and obtained an enhancement of the sentence. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Dinesh Singh Bhatia v PP: Sentencing for Cocaine Consumption under Misuse of Drugs Act 04 Apr 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	04 Apr 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially lostThe High Court reduced the sentence from 12 months to 8 months.
27	Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights 19 Oct 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Oct 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by the appellant was dismissed.
28	PP v Zailani bin Ahmad: Murder, Common Intention, Diminished Responsibility 12 Sep 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	12 Sep 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty of murder and sentenced to death.
29	Public Prosecutor v Chew Seow Leng: Drug Trafficking, Mandatory Death Penalty & Equal Protection 07 Sep 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	07 Sep 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on amended charge and sentenced to death.
30	PP v Nguyen Tuong Van: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights 19 Mar 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Mar 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and convicted; sentenced to death.
31	Mohd Sharif v PP: Trafficking Diamorphine - Knowledge & Presumption under Misuse of Drugs Act 01 Feb 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Feb 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction of the appellant.
32	Public Prosecutor v Yeo Kang Oh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Aug 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Aug 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused convicted and sentenced to death.
33	Public Prosecutor v Pick Hoo Kee: Rape of Mentally Retarded Victim 05 Jul 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Jul 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 20 years imprisonment.
34	Tay Chin Wah v Public Prosecutor: Arms Offences Act & Presumption of Intent to Cause Physical Injury 01 May 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 May 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction and sentence.
35	Zulfikar v PP: Misuse of Drugs Act & Possession for Trafficking 30 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	30 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed.
36	Chua Seong Soi v PP: Common Gaming House Definition & Habitual Gaming 25 Sep 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	25 Sep 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and conviction set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	Chng Gim Huat v PP: Tax Evasion Appeal - Interest Income Omission & Sentencing 04 Jul 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	04 Jul 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against convictions upheld; appeals against sentences overturned.Appeal against convictions upheld; appeals against sentences overturned. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.