Public Prosecutor v CNJ: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide by Young Offender

In Public Prosecutor v CNJ, before the General Division of the High Court of Singapore on 24 January 2022, CNJ was sentenced to five years' detention for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The court, presided over by Aedit Abdullah J, considered the sentencing objectives for young offenders, including rehabilitation, public protection, retribution, and specific deterrence, as outlined in the Children and Young Persons Act. The court found that detention was the appropriate punishment, balancing the need for rehabilitation with the seriousness of the offense.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused sentenced to five years’ detention.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Sentencing Remarks

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

CNJ, a young offender, was sentenced to five years' detention for culpable homicide. The court considered rehabilitation, public protection, retribution, and specific deterrence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencySentence of five years’ detention imposedWon
Lim Shin Hui of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Han Ming Kuang of Attorney-General’s Chambers
CNJDefendantIndividualSentence of five years’ detention imposedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Aedit AbdullahJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The accused pleaded guilty to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
  2. The accused was 15 years old at the time of the offense, making him a 'young person' under the CYPA.
  3. The victim was a family member of the accused.
  4. The psychiatric assessment indicated that the accused is unlikely to repeat such a violent act.
  5. The accused cooperated with authorities during the investigation.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v CNJ, Criminal Case No 2 of 2022, [2022] SGHC 18

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Sentencing of Young Offenders
    • Outcome: The court determined that a five-year detention was appropriate, considering rehabilitation, public protection, retribution, and specific deterrence.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Sentencing

9. Cause of Actions

  • Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
PP v ASRHigh CourtYes[2019] 1 SLR 941SingaporeCited to describe rehabilitation as the dominant consideration in sentencing.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
Children and Young Persons Act (Cap 38, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Culpable Homicide
  • Young Offender
  • Detention
  • Rehabilitation
  • Sentencing Objectives
  • Children and Young Persons Act

15.2 Keywords

  • culpable homicide
  • young offender
  • sentencing
  • detention
  • rehabilitation
  • Singapore
  • criminal law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Youth Justice