Ho Pei Shien Melanie

Ho Pei Shien Melanie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in disciplinary proceedings (medical) and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 39.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 39% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated expertise across 90 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privacy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent powers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalty Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fund Raising	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Promissory estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transnational issue estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance and champerty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Champerty and maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cost-proofing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reverse Takeover	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Tax Cooperation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Pei Shien Melanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Pei Shien Melanie has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 17 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	17 cases	94% of cases	Tilani v Koedijk: Arbitration Confidentiality & Court's Inherent Powers(Oct 2024) DDI v DDJ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Excess of Jurisdiction, Bias, and Breach of Fair Hearing Rule(Mar 2024) Tan Hui Min Sabrina Alberta v Chiang Hai Ding: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Shophouse Ownership Dispute(Sep 2023)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	6% of cases	Ho Paul v Singapore Medical Council: Doctor's Suspension Over Subutex Prescription Challenged(Jan 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Pei Shien Melanie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.6
Complex Cases: 7 (39%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	95.4 parties avg	5.4	50%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	6%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Won	76.0 parties avg	6.0	39%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	27.3 parties avg	7.3
2017	25.2 parties avg	5.2
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2020	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	35.6 parties avg	5.6
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Pei Shien Melanie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	1(6%)	6%
Won	7(39%)	39%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	336,000.00	25,846.1513 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tilani v Koedijk: Arbitration Confidentiality & Court's Inherent Powers 29 Oct 2024 Karan Chandur Tilani (Appellant)Lost	29 Oct 2024	Karan Chandur Tilani (Appellant): Application DismissedApplication for sealing order dismissed; costs of SGD 6,000 inclusive of disbursements to be paid by the appellant to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	DDI v DDJ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Excess of Jurisdiction, Bias, and Breach of Fair Hearing Rule 13 Mar 2024 DDI (Applicant)Lost	13 Mar 2024	DDI (Applicant): Application dismissedThe applicant's application to set aside the Final Award was dismissed. The applicant was ordered to pay costs to the respondents fixed at $25,000 plus disbursements to be fixed by the court if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tan Hui Min Sabrina Alberta v Chiang Hai Ding: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Shophouse Ownership Dispute 13 Sep 2023 Tan Hui Min Sabrina Alberta (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Sep 2023	Tan Hui Min Sabrina Alberta (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for beneficial ownership of the property was dismissed.
4	Wee Teong Boo v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Evidentiary Decision 18 Jul 2022 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2022	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for leave to seek a quashing order against the Admissibility Decision was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	POA Recovery v Yau Kwok Seng: Illegality, Public Policy, Maintenance, Champerty, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Deceit 17 Feb 2022 Capital Asia Group Oil Management Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Neutral	17 Feb 2022	Capital Asia Group Oil Management Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment under the sub-heading of “Champerty and maintenance” remainsThe court's decision regarding champerty and maintenance remains unchanged despite the clarification on the security for costs.
6	POA Recovery Pte Ltd v Yau Kwok Seng: Investment Fraud, Maintenance, and Champerty 02 Feb 2022 Capital Asia Group Oil Management Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Feb 2022	Capital Asia Group Oil Management Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedPOA Recovery is to bear the costs of AD 26, fixed at S$85,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KGaA: Transnational Issue Estoppel & Foreign Judgments 25 Feb 2021 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (formerly known as Merck & Co, Inc) (Appellant)Lost	25 Feb 2021	Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (formerly known as Merck & Co, Inc) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $50,000 awarded to the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Paulus Tannos v Heince Tombak Simanjuntak: Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcy Orders & Natural Justice 26 Aug 2020 Maria Margaretha Jusuf (Respondent)Lost	26 Aug 2020	Maria Margaretha Jusuf (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the recognition of the Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders was set aside.
9	Heince Tombak Simanjuntak v Paulus Tannos: Recognition of Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders in Singapore 17 Sep 2019 William E. Daniel (Applicant)Won	17 Sep 2019	William E. Daniel (Applicant): Application grantedRecognition granted to the Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders, empowering the applicants to administer the respondents’ property in Singapore, subject to certain conditions.
10	Nanyang Medical Investments v Kuek Bak Kim: Contractual Interpretation & Default Call Options 27 Nov 2018 Aesthetic Alchemy Pte. Ltd. (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Won	27 Nov 2018	Aesthetic Alchemy Pte. Ltd. (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for specific performance was allowed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Ang Peng Tiam v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct in Medical Practice 26 Jun 2017 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	26 Jun 2017	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against sentence dismissed in part.
12	AXY v Comptroller of Income Tax: Judicial Review of Tax Information Exchange 01 Mar 2017 AYB (Applicant)Lost	01 Mar 2017	AYB (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed; costs awarded to the Respondent and the Attorney-General's Chambers (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Ang Pek San Lawrence v Singapore Medical Council: Disciplinary Proceedings & Costs 04 Mar 2015 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	04 Mar 2015	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to bear the costs of both the Inquiry and the appeal. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Leong Hin Chuee v Citra Group: Breach of Employment Agreement & Director's Duties 28 Jan 2015 Suganda Setiadikurnia (Defendant)Won	28 Jan 2015	Suganda Setiadikurnia (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for breach of employment agreement dismissed.
15	Ang Pek San Lawrence v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct & Standard of Care in VBAC Delivery 18 Nov 2014 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	18 Nov 2014	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Orders set asideThe High Court set aside the orders made by the Disciplinary Committee in relation to the Fourth Charge and ordered that the appellant is to have his costs and disbursements of the inquiry as well as of the proceedings before this court (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct and Ethical Obligations of Medical Practitioners 27 Jun 2013 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	27 Jun 2013	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Decision UpheldThe Disciplinary Committee's decision to suspend the appellant was upheld.
17	Dr Eric Gan v SMC: Negligence in Post-operative Care After ERCP Procedure 31 Oct 2010 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	31 Oct 2010	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Decision UpheldThe Disciplinary Committee's decision finding Dr. Gan guilty of professional misconduct was upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Ho Paul v Singapore Medical Council: Doctor's Suspension Over Subutex Prescription Challenged 15 Jan 2008 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Partial	15 Jan 2008	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal partially allowedThe appeal was partially allowed, with the suspension set aside but the fine increased (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).